{"title":"CO2-driven crop comparative advantage and planting decision: Evidence from US cropland","authors":"Ziheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In addition to the well-known per-acre yield benefits, elevated CO<sub>2</sub> also influences cropping patterns. An important characteristic of CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization is that C3 crops exhibit a more pronounced response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels in comparison to C4 crops. Such differential responses of C3 and C4 crops to increasing CO<sub>2</sub> levels are likely to alter cropping patterns in favor of C3 crops, as CO<sub>2</sub> provides C3 crops with a comparative advantage. This study empirically investigates the CO<sub>2</sub> effects on the corn and soybean acreage, the most representative C4 and C3 crops, in the U.S. Employing an instrumental variable that exploits exogenous variation driven by wind, I find that a one-ppm rise in CO<sub>2</sub> significantly reduces the corn acreage by 1.19% and increases the soybean acreage by 1.51%. The CO<sub>2</sub>-driven shrinkage in corn acreage may involve switching to soybeans, spring wheat, and cotton, with CO<sub>2</sub>-driven soybean expansion achieved by replacing corn and sorghum. Neglecting the CO<sub>2</sub>-driven acreage shift would lead, according to the forecast simulations, to an underestimation of the CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect on soybean production and an overestimation of the CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect on corn production. Given the diverse uses of corn and soybeans, such shifts in their acreage and production could have important implications for multiple sectors and market dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In addition to the well-known per-acre yield benefits, elevated CO2 also influences cropping patterns. An important characteristic of CO2 fertilization is that C3 crops exhibit a more pronounced response to elevated CO2 levels in comparison to C4 crops. Such differential responses of C3 and C4 crops to increasing CO2 levels are likely to alter cropping patterns in favor of C3 crops, as CO2 provides C3 crops with a comparative advantage. This study empirically investigates the CO2 effects on the corn and soybean acreage, the most representative C4 and C3 crops, in the U.S. Employing an instrumental variable that exploits exogenous variation driven by wind, I find that a one-ppm rise in CO2 significantly reduces the corn acreage by 1.19% and increases the soybean acreage by 1.51%. The CO2-driven shrinkage in corn acreage may involve switching to soybeans, spring wheat, and cotton, with CO2-driven soybean expansion achieved by replacing corn and sorghum. Neglecting the CO2-driven acreage shift would lead, according to the forecast simulations, to an underestimation of the CO2 fertilization effect on soybean production and an overestimation of the CO2 fertilization effect on corn production. Given the diverse uses of corn and soybeans, such shifts in their acreage and production could have important implications for multiple sectors and market dynamics.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.