Natalia Ortega, Nick J Mueller, Abbas Dehghan, Tosca O E de Crom, Armin von Gunten, Martin Preisig, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Marco Vinceti, Trudy Voortman, Nicolas Rodondi, Patricia O Chocano-Bedoya
{"title":"Dairy intake and cognitive function in older adults in three cohorts: a mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Natalia Ortega, Nick J Mueller, Abbas Dehghan, Tosca O E de Crom, Armin von Gunten, Martin Preisig, Pedro Marques-Vidal, Marco Vinceti, Trudy Voortman, Nicolas Rodondi, Patricia O Chocano-Bedoya","doi":"10.1186/s12937-025-01083-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meta-analyses of observational studies on the effect of dairy on cognitive function have yielded inconclusive results, potentially due to unmeasured confounding. To avoid the no-unmeasured confounding assumption, we used lactase persistence genetic variant as an instrumental variable, for which the CC genotype is associated with lower lactase production and, consequently, lower dairy consumption. We used it to assess the effect of long-term consumption of total and non-fermented dairy on cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 43,836 individuals over 55 years old with genotyping, dietary data, and cognitive function measurements from three population-based studies: CoLaus|PsyCoLaus (Switzerland), the Rotterdam Study (the Netherlands) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA - Canada). We performed a one-sample Mendelian randomization using two-stage least-squares regression. First, we estimated total and non-fermented dairy consumption by T-allele frequency. Second, we used the estimated dairy consumption in linear regression models on general cognition, assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Mental Alternation Test, executive function, verbal fluency, verbal learning, and memory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Per T-allele, total dairy intake and non-fermented was 24.8 and 15.3 g/day higher in PsyCoLaus, 57.9 and 49.8 g/day in the Rotterdam Study, and 0.31 and 0.29 times/day in CLSA, respectively. We found no association between the genetically predicted difference and the MMSE in PsyCoLaus and the Rotterdam Study. However, lactase persistent individuals scored 3.4 (95% CI 2.1- 4.7) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.3-4.7) points more in the Mental Alternation Test for total and fermented dairy, respectively, in CLSA. Similarly, lactase persistent participants in CLSA had higher verbal fluency, verbal learning and executive function, but no differences were found in the other cohorts. Such inconsistencies might stem from different FFQs across cohorts and consumption ranges. Nonetheless, the generally small magnitude of effect sizes may suggest that there is no real effect between total or non-fermented dairy intake and cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence for a causal effect of dairy consumption on general cognitive function is weak, consistent with previous results from classic analysis from observational studies. Interventions targeting dairy are unlikely to have a relevant effect on cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01083-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Meta-analyses of observational studies on the effect of dairy on cognitive function have yielded inconclusive results, potentially due to unmeasured confounding. To avoid the no-unmeasured confounding assumption, we used lactase persistence genetic variant as an instrumental variable, for which the CC genotype is associated with lower lactase production and, consequently, lower dairy consumption. We used it to assess the effect of long-term consumption of total and non-fermented dairy on cognitive function.
Methods: We included 43,836 individuals over 55 years old with genotyping, dietary data, and cognitive function measurements from three population-based studies: CoLaus|PsyCoLaus (Switzerland), the Rotterdam Study (the Netherlands) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA - Canada). We performed a one-sample Mendelian randomization using two-stage least-squares regression. First, we estimated total and non-fermented dairy consumption by T-allele frequency. Second, we used the estimated dairy consumption in linear regression models on general cognition, assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Mental Alternation Test, executive function, verbal fluency, verbal learning, and memory.
Results: Per T-allele, total dairy intake and non-fermented was 24.8 and 15.3 g/day higher in PsyCoLaus, 57.9 and 49.8 g/day in the Rotterdam Study, and 0.31 and 0.29 times/day in CLSA, respectively. We found no association between the genetically predicted difference and the MMSE in PsyCoLaus and the Rotterdam Study. However, lactase persistent individuals scored 3.4 (95% CI 2.1- 4.7) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.3-4.7) points more in the Mental Alternation Test for total and fermented dairy, respectively, in CLSA. Similarly, lactase persistent participants in CLSA had higher verbal fluency, verbal learning and executive function, but no differences were found in the other cohorts. Such inconsistencies might stem from different FFQs across cohorts and consumption ranges. Nonetheless, the generally small magnitude of effect sizes may suggest that there is no real effect between total or non-fermented dairy intake and cognitive function.
Conclusion: The evidence for a causal effect of dairy consumption on general cognitive function is weak, consistent with previous results from classic analysis from observational studies. Interventions targeting dairy are unlikely to have a relevant effect on cognitive function.
背景:关于乳制品对认知功能影响的观察性研究的荟萃分析得出了不确定的结果,可能是由于未测量的混淆。为了避免未测量的混淆假设,我们使用乳糖酶持久性遗传变异作为工具变量,其中CC基因型与较低的乳糖酶产量相关,因此,较低的乳制品消费量。我们用它来评估长期食用总乳制品和非发酵乳制品对认知功能的影响。方法:我们纳入了43836名55岁以上的个体,包括基因分型、饮食数据和认知功能测量,这些数据来自三个基于人群的研究:CoLaus|PsyCoLaus(瑞士)、鹿特丹研究(荷兰)和加拿大老龄化纵向研究(里昂证券-加拿大)。我们使用两阶段最小二乘回归进行单样本孟德尔随机化。首先,我们通过t等位基因频率估计了总乳制品消费量和非发酵乳制品消费量。其次,我们在一般认知的线性回归模型中使用了估计的乳制品消费量,通过迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和精神交替测试评估,执行功能,语言流畅性,语言学习和记忆。结果:每个t等位基因,PsyCoLaus的总乳制品摄入量和非发酵乳制品摄入量分别高出24.8和15.3 g/d,鹿特丹研究高出57.9和49.8 g/d,里昂研究高出0.31和0.29 g/d。在PsyCoLaus和鹿特丹研究中,我们发现基因预测差异与MMSE之间没有关联。然而,在里昂证券的脑力交替测试中,乳糖酶持久性个体对总乳制品和发酵乳制品的得分分别高出3.4分(95% CI 2.1- 4.7)和3.5分(95% CI 2.3-4.7)。同样,持续使用乳糖酶的里昂证券参与者具有更高的语言流畅性,语言学习和执行功能,但在其他队列中没有发现差异。这种不一致可能源于不同人群和消费范围的ffq不同。尽管如此,总体上较小的效应量可能表明,总或非发酵乳制品摄入量与认知功能之间没有真正的影响。结论:乳制品消费对一般认知功能有因果影响的证据很弱,与先前观察性研究的经典分析结果一致。针对乳制品的干预措施不太可能对认知功能产生相关影响。
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered.
Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies.
In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.