Systematic literature review on Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition (CPPD) nomenclature: condition elements and clinical states- A Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) consensus project.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Charlotte Jauffret, Antonella Adinolfi, Silvia Sirotti, Daniele Cirillo, Luca Ingrao, Alessandro Lucia, Edoardo Cipolletta, Emilio Filippucci, Sara Tedeschi, Robert Terkeltaub, Nicola Dalbeth, Tristan Pascart, Georgios Filippou
{"title":"Systematic literature review on Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition (CPPD) nomenclature: condition elements and clinical states- A Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) consensus project.","authors":"Charlotte Jauffret, Antonella Adinolfi, Silvia Sirotti, Daniele Cirillo, Luca Ingrao, Alessandro Lucia, Edoardo Cipolletta, Emilio Filippucci, Sara Tedeschi, Robert Terkeltaub, Nicola Dalbeth, Tristan Pascart, Georgios Filippou","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) has developed a calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) nomenclature project. This systematic literature review constituted its first step and aimed to provide a state-of-the-art analysis of the medical literature of the last 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was undertaken in the <i>PubMed</i>, <i>Cochrane</i> and <i>Embase</i> databases between 2000 and 2022, restricted to studies on humans and in the English language. Eight reviewers independently and manually extracted labels related to CPPD concepts, according to an a priori list generated by the authors: pathogenic conditions and pathogenic crystal labels, elementary imaging condition elements and asymptomatic and symptomatic condition states. For each concept, labels were analysed to determine their frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2375 articles identified, 886 articles were included, of which 394 (44.5%) were case reports and 169 (19.0%) were scoping reviews. Overall, the most common labels used to designate the pathogenic condition were '<i>pseudogout'</i> in 365/783 (46.6%), '<i>chondrocalcinosis'</i> in 207/783 (26.4%) and '<i>calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease'</i> in 181/783 (23.1%) occurrences. The most common abbreviation was 'CPPD' in 312/390 (80.0%), but with different meanings. CPPD clinical phenotypes were often described as 'pseudo-form' labels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Those results demonstrate the heterogeneity of labels used to describe CPPD condition concepts, with wide variation in condition labels in the medical literature. This work provides the rationale and basis to achieve agreement about CPPD technical nomenclature.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004847","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network (G-CAN) has developed a calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) nomenclature project. This systematic literature review constituted its first step and aimed to provide a state-of-the-art analysis of the medical literature of the last 20 years.

Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken in the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases between 2000 and 2022, restricted to studies on humans and in the English language. Eight reviewers independently and manually extracted labels related to CPPD concepts, according to an a priori list generated by the authors: pathogenic conditions and pathogenic crystal labels, elementary imaging condition elements and asymptomatic and symptomatic condition states. For each concept, labels were analysed to determine their frequency.

Results: Among the 2375 articles identified, 886 articles were included, of which 394 (44.5%) were case reports and 169 (19.0%) were scoping reviews. Overall, the most common labels used to designate the pathogenic condition were 'pseudogout' in 365/783 (46.6%), 'chondrocalcinosis' in 207/783 (26.4%) and 'calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease' in 181/783 (23.1%) occurrences. The most common abbreviation was 'CPPD' in 312/390 (80.0%), but with different meanings. CPPD clinical phenotypes were often described as 'pseudo-form' labels.

Conclusion: Those results demonstrate the heterogeneity of labels used to describe CPPD condition concepts, with wide variation in condition labels in the medical literature. This work provides the rationale and basis to achieve agreement about CPPD technical nomenclature.

焦磷酸钙沉积(CPPD)命名法的系统文献综述:条件要素和临床状态——痛风、高尿酸血症和晶体相关疾病网络(G-CAN)共识项目。
目的:痛风、高尿酸血症和晶体相关疾病网络(G-CAN)开发了焦磷酸钙沉积(CPPD)命名项目。这个系统的文献综述是它的第一步,目的是对过去20年的医学文献提供最先进的分析。方法:在2000年至2022年期间,在PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,仅限于人类和英语的研究。8位审稿人根据作者生成的先验列表,独立手动提取与CPPD概念相关的标签:致病条件和致病晶体标签、基本成像条件要素、无症状和症状状态。对于每个概念,分析标签以确定其频率。结果:共纳入2375篇文献886篇,其中病例报告394篇(44.5%),范围评价169篇(19.0%)。总体而言,用于指定致病性疾病的最常见标签是365/783(46.6%)的“假out”,207/783(26.4%)的“软骨钙化症”和181/783(23.1%)的“焦磷酸钙沉积病”。在312/390中,最常见的缩写是“CPPD”(80.0%),但含义不同。CPPD临床表型通常被描述为“伪形式”标签。结论:这些结果显示了用于描述CPPD疾病概念的标签的异质性,医学文献中疾病标签的差异很大。本工作为cpd技术术语的统一提供了理论依据和基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信