Peer Victimization and School Engagement among Chinese Adolescents: Does Classroom-Level Victimization Matter?

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Zhi Ye, Kehui Wu, Li Niu, Yan Li, Zhengge Chen, Lihua Chen, Shan Zhao
{"title":"Peer Victimization and School Engagement among Chinese Adolescents: Does Classroom-Level Victimization Matter?","authors":"Zhi Ye, Kehui Wu, Li Niu, Yan Li, Zhengge Chen, Lihua Chen, Shan Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02150-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer victimization has been demonstrated to have a long-lasting negative impact on adolescents' psychological well-being, yet its impact on school engagement is inconclusive, particularly during high school. In addition, research about the role of classroom-level victimization in the association between individual-level peer victimization and adolescents' school engagement remains underexplored. Previous research has relied solely on self-report measures to assess peer victimization, potentially limiting the scope of understanding. This study investigated the moderating effects of both student-reported and teacher-reported classroom-level victimization on the association between individual-level peer victimization and school engagement among Chinese adolescents. A sample of 2,803 high school students (aged from 14-19 years, M<sub>age</sub> = 15.43 years, SD = 0.56; 48.5% boys) from 48 classes (M<sub>class size</sub> = 58.62, SD = 3.65) completed measures of peer victimization and school engagement in October 2023. Their homeroom teachers (85.4% males; M<sub>age</sub> = 44.17 years, SD = 7.70) reported overall victimization in each class. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that, at the individual level, adolescents who reported higher victimization exhibited lower school engagement. Notably, this association was significant only when the classroom-level victimization was high. Furthermore, these significant findings were observed for student-reported classroom-level victimization, but not for teacher-reported victimization. The findings suggest that reducing classroom-level victimization may help mitigate the negative effect of peer victimization on school engagement, underscoring the need to consider classroom environment when developing anti-bullying interventions for high school students.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02150-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peer victimization has been demonstrated to have a long-lasting negative impact on adolescents' psychological well-being, yet its impact on school engagement is inconclusive, particularly during high school. In addition, research about the role of classroom-level victimization in the association between individual-level peer victimization and adolescents' school engagement remains underexplored. Previous research has relied solely on self-report measures to assess peer victimization, potentially limiting the scope of understanding. This study investigated the moderating effects of both student-reported and teacher-reported classroom-level victimization on the association between individual-level peer victimization and school engagement among Chinese adolescents. A sample of 2,803 high school students (aged from 14-19 years, Mage = 15.43 years, SD = 0.56; 48.5% boys) from 48 classes (Mclass size = 58.62, SD = 3.65) completed measures of peer victimization and school engagement in October 2023. Their homeroom teachers (85.4% males; Mage = 44.17 years, SD = 7.70) reported overall victimization in each class. Multilevel modeling analyses revealed that, at the individual level, adolescents who reported higher victimization exhibited lower school engagement. Notably, this association was significant only when the classroom-level victimization was high. Furthermore, these significant findings were observed for student-reported classroom-level victimization, but not for teacher-reported victimization. The findings suggest that reducing classroom-level victimization may help mitigate the negative effect of peer victimization on school engagement, underscoring the need to consider classroom environment when developing anti-bullying interventions for high school students.

中国青少年同伴伤害与学校参与:课堂层面的伤害有影响吗?
同伴伤害已被证明对青少年的心理健康有长期的负面影响,但其对学校参与的影响尚无定论,特别是在高中。此外,关于课堂层面的伤害在个体层面同伴伤害与青少年学校参与之间的关系中的作用的研究仍未得到充分探讨。以前的研究仅仅依赖于自我报告来评估同伴受害,这可能限制了理解的范围。本研究探讨了学生报告和教师报告课堂层面的伤害对中国青少年个体层面同伴伤害与学校参与之间关系的调节作用。样本为2803名高中生(年龄14-19岁,Mage = 15.43岁,SD = 0.56;来自48个班级(班级规模= 58.62,SD = 3.65)的48.5%男孩于2023年10月完成了同伴受害和学校参与的测量。班主任(85.4%男性;男= 44.17岁,SD = 7.70)报告了每个班级的总体受害情况。多层次模型分析显示,在个人层面上,报告受害程度较高的青少年表现出较低的学校参与度。值得注意的是,这种关联只有在课堂受害程度高时才显著。此外,这些显著的发现在学生报告的课堂层面的受害行为中被观察到,而在教师报告的受害行为中没有被观察到。研究结果表明,减少课堂层面的欺凌行为可能有助于减轻同伴伤害对学校参与的负面影响,强调在为高中生制定反欺凌干预措施时考虑课堂环境的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信