Ramp protocol for non-linear cerebrovascular reactivity with transcranial doppler ultrasound.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Genevieve Hayes, Sierra Sparks, Joana Pinto, Daniel P Bulte
{"title":"Ramp protocol for non-linear cerebrovascular reactivity with transcranial doppler ultrasound.","authors":"Genevieve Hayes, Sierra Sparks, Joana Pinto, Daniel P Bulte","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the ability of cerebral blood vessels to adjust their diameter in response to vasoactive stimuli, which is crucial for maintaining brain health. Traditional CVR assessments commonly use a two-point measurement, assuming a linear relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial CO<sub>2</sub>. However, this approach fails to capture non-linear characteristics, particularly the plateaus at extreme CO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>This study introduces a cost-effective, ramp-based end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (PETCO<sub>2</sub>) protocol to assess non-linear aspects of CVR. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we monitored blood velocity responses to progressive increases in arterial CO<sub>2</sub> levels in eleven healthy adults, covering a spectrum from hypocapnia to hypercapnia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All eleven participants successfully completed the protocol, with an average PETCO<sub>2</sub> range of 26 ± 4 mmHg and blood velocity changes from -29 % to + 50 % relative to baseline. Non-linear CVR characteristics were observed in all subjects. Sigmoid models provided significantly better fits to the CVR data than linear models, while Bayesian approaches followed expected physiological ranges more accurately than least squares regression methods.</p><p><strong>Comparison with existing methods: </strong>Unlike traditional CVR methods, this ramp protocol captures the full, non-linear CVR profile. The sigmoid modeling approach offers a more accurate representation of cerebrovascular dynamics, particularly at CO<sub>2</sub> extremes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PETCO<sub>2</sub> ramp protocol with non-linear CVR modeling shows promise as an accessible and reliable tool for assessing CBF dynamics. With high completion rates, straightforward implementation, and low equipment cost, this approach holds significant potential for clinical applications in cerebrovascular health evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) reflects the ability of cerebral blood vessels to adjust their diameter in response to vasoactive stimuli, which is crucial for maintaining brain health. Traditional CVR assessments commonly use a two-point measurement, assuming a linear relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial CO2. However, this approach fails to capture non-linear characteristics, particularly the plateaus at extreme CO2 levels.

New method: This study introduces a cost-effective, ramp-based end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) protocol to assess non-linear aspects of CVR. Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we monitored blood velocity responses to progressive increases in arterial CO2 levels in eleven healthy adults, covering a spectrum from hypocapnia to hypercapnia.

Results: All eleven participants successfully completed the protocol, with an average PETCO2 range of 26 ± 4 mmHg and blood velocity changes from -29 % to + 50 % relative to baseline. Non-linear CVR characteristics were observed in all subjects. Sigmoid models provided significantly better fits to the CVR data than linear models, while Bayesian approaches followed expected physiological ranges more accurately than least squares regression methods.

Comparison with existing methods: Unlike traditional CVR methods, this ramp protocol captures the full, non-linear CVR profile. The sigmoid modeling approach offers a more accurate representation of cerebrovascular dynamics, particularly at CO2 extremes.

Conclusions: The PETCO2 ramp protocol with non-linear CVR modeling shows promise as an accessible and reliable tool for assessing CBF dynamics. With high completion rates, straightforward implementation, and low equipment cost, this approach holds significant potential for clinical applications in cerebrovascular health evaluation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信