Predictive models of clinical outcome of endovascular treatment for anterior circulation stroke using machine learning

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Bogey Clement , Rouchaud Aymeric , Gentric Jean-Christophe , Beaufreton Edouard , Timsit Serge , Clarencon Frederic , Caroff Jildaz , Bourcier Romain , Zhu François , Dargazanli Cyril , Hak Jean-François , Boulouis Gregoire , Ifergan Heloise , Pop Raoul , Forestier Geraud , Lapergue Bertrand , Ognard Julien , Etis Investigators
{"title":"Predictive models of clinical outcome of endovascular treatment for anterior circulation stroke using machine learning","authors":"Bogey Clement ,&nbsp;Rouchaud Aymeric ,&nbsp;Gentric Jean-Christophe ,&nbsp;Beaufreton Edouard ,&nbsp;Timsit Serge ,&nbsp;Clarencon Frederic ,&nbsp;Caroff Jildaz ,&nbsp;Bourcier Romain ,&nbsp;Zhu François ,&nbsp;Dargazanli Cyril ,&nbsp;Hak Jean-François ,&nbsp;Boulouis Gregoire ,&nbsp;Ifergan Heloise ,&nbsp;Pop Raoul ,&nbsp;Forestier Geraud ,&nbsp;Lapergue Bertrand ,&nbsp;Ognard Julien ,&nbsp;Etis Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) has recently become the standard of care for anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion, but predictive factors of successful MT are still not clearly defined. To tailor treatment individually for each patient, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of Machine Learning to predict clinical outcome (mRS) at 3 months after MT.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>From the ETIS French prospective multicenter registry, data from patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion between January 2018 and December 2020 were extracted. Three machine learning models (Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and XGBoost) have been trained with clinical, biological and brain imaging data available in emergency conditions from the cohort of patients treated from 2018 to 2019. Models’ performances to predict good outcome (3-months mRS &lt;3) were evaluated on patients treated in 2020. Performances were evaluated with AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, then ROC curves AUC were compared with the best performing model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>4297 patients were included, 1737 (40 %) with good outcome and 2560 (60 %) with bad outcome were used to train models and 599 patients treated in 2020 were used to evaluate their performances. The best model was obtained with <em>XGBoost: A</em>UC = 0.77, accuracy = 69.3 % but no statistically significant difference existed between models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study shows satisfying performances of machine learning to predict clinical outcome after MT using data easily available at initial diagnosis and before the decision to treat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"416 ","pages":"Article 110376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025000172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) has recently become the standard of care for anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion, but predictive factors of successful MT are still not clearly defined. To tailor treatment individually for each patient, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of Machine Learning to predict clinical outcome (mRS) at 3 months after MT.

Material and methods

From the ETIS French prospective multicenter registry, data from patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation stroke with large vessel occlusion between January 2018 and December 2020 were extracted. Three machine learning models (Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and XGBoost) have been trained with clinical, biological and brain imaging data available in emergency conditions from the cohort of patients treated from 2018 to 2019. Models’ performances to predict good outcome (3-months mRS <3) were evaluated on patients treated in 2020. Performances were evaluated with AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, then ROC curves AUC were compared with the best performing model.

Results

4297 patients were included, 1737 (40 %) with good outcome and 2560 (60 %) with bad outcome were used to train models and 599 patients treated in 2020 were used to evaluate their performances. The best model was obtained with XGBoost: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 69.3 % but no statistically significant difference existed between models.

Conclusion

Our study shows satisfying performances of machine learning to predict clinical outcome after MT using data easily available at initial diagnosis and before the decision to treat.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信