Emma Whooley, Vincent Koppelmans, Hayley J MacDonald, Alison Hall, Marit F L Ruitenberg
{"title":"Dopamine genetic risk scores and psychiatric symptoms: Interacting risk factors for impulse control behaviours in de novo Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Emma Whooley, Vincent Koppelmans, Hayley J MacDonald, Alison Hall, Marit F L Ruitenberg","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Up to 45% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience impulse control disorders (ICDs), characterized by a loss of voluntary control over impulses, drives or temptations. This study aimed to investigate whether previously identified genetic and psychiatric risk factors interact towards the development of ICDs in PD. A total of 278 de novo PD patients (ICD-free at enrollment) were selected from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database. ICD presence at baseline and yearly follow-up assessments were evaluated via the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders. Symptoms of anxiety and depression at baseline were measured via the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory and Geriatric Depression Scale, respectively. Furthermore, an individual dopamine genetic risk score was calculated according to polymorphisms in genes coding for dopamine (D1, D2 and D3 receptors and catechol-O-methyltransferase), with higher scores reflecting higher central dopamine neurotransmission. In total, 146 participants (47.5%) developed an ICD with an average onset time of 36 months (range 3-96) from baseline. Results from a Cox proportional hazards model showed a trait anxiety × genetics interaction, suggesting that individuals with both higher baseline trait anxiety scores and higher dopamine genetic risk scores were at increased risk of ICD development. This interaction remained significant after controlling for age, sex and motor symptom severity. Our findings suggest that genetic and psychiatric predictors of impulsivity in PD interact and jointly yield increased ICD risk during the course of the disorder. This implies that early screening of anxiety symptoms in combination with genotyping can be useful to identify those at risk for ICD.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Up to 45% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience impulse control disorders (ICDs), characterized by a loss of voluntary control over impulses, drives or temptations. This study aimed to investigate whether previously identified genetic and psychiatric risk factors interact towards the development of ICDs in PD. A total of 278 de novo PD patients (ICD-free at enrollment) were selected from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database. ICD presence at baseline and yearly follow-up assessments were evaluated via the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders. Symptoms of anxiety and depression at baseline were measured via the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory and Geriatric Depression Scale, respectively. Furthermore, an individual dopamine genetic risk score was calculated according to polymorphisms in genes coding for dopamine (D1, D2 and D3 receptors and catechol-O-methyltransferase), with higher scores reflecting higher central dopamine neurotransmission. In total, 146 participants (47.5%) developed an ICD with an average onset time of 36 months (range 3-96) from baseline. Results from a Cox proportional hazards model showed a trait anxiety × genetics interaction, suggesting that individuals with both higher baseline trait anxiety scores and higher dopamine genetic risk scores were at increased risk of ICD development. This interaction remained significant after controlling for age, sex and motor symptom severity. Our findings suggest that genetic and psychiatric predictors of impulsivity in PD interact and jointly yield increased ICD risk during the course of the disorder. This implies that early screening of anxiety symptoms in combination with genotyping can be useful to identify those at risk for ICD.
高达45%的帕金森氏症(PD)患者患有冲动控制障碍(ICDs),其特征是失去对冲动、冲动或诱惑的自主控制。本研究旨在调查先前确定的遗传和精神危险因素是否与PD患者的icd发展相互作用。从帕金森进展标志物倡议数据库中选择278名PD患者(入组时无icd)。通过冲动性强迫症问卷评估ICD在基线和年度随访评估中的存在。基线时的焦虑和抑郁症状分别通过状态-特质-焦虑量表和老年抑郁量表进行测量。此外,根据多巴胺编码基因(D1、D2和D3受体和儿茶酚- o -甲基转移酶)的多态性计算个体多巴胺遗传风险评分,得分越高反映中枢多巴胺神经传递越高。共有146名参与者(47.5%)发展为ICD,平均发病时间为36个月(范围3-96个月)。Cox比例风险模型的结果显示,特质焦虑与遗传相互作用,表明基线特质焦虑评分较高和多巴胺遗传风险评分较高的个体发生ICD的风险增加。在控制了年龄、性别和运动症状严重程度后,这种相互作用仍然显著。我们的研究结果表明,PD中冲动性的遗传和精神预测因素相互作用并共同导致疾病过程中ICD风险增加。这意味着早期筛查焦虑症状并结合基因分型可用于识别有ICD风险的人。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including:
• clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups
• behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes
• cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging
• multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science
The following types of paper are invited:
• papers reporting original empirical investigations
• theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data
• review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications
• brief reports and comments
• case reports
• fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors)
• special issues.