Medicare Resource Use Differs by English Reading Proficiency.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae105
Lilly Estenson, Eric T Roberts, Mireille Jacobson
{"title":"Medicare Resource Use Differs by English Reading Proficiency.","authors":"Lilly Estenson, Eric T Roberts, Mireille Jacobson","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Medicare coverage decisions are complex. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provides a hotline, handbook, and website to help Medicare beneficiaries understand their benefits and coverage options, yet it is unclear what factors affect beneficiary use of these resources. We examined limited English speaking and English reading proficiency status as predictors of CMS Medicare informational resource use in a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used 2016-2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data and linear probability models to assess whether the likelihood of using CMS Medicare informational resources differed among beneficiaries with limited English proficiency. We adjusted models for demographic, socioeconomic, health, and local market factors and, in sensitivity analyses, health insurance characteristics. Our primary outcome was an indicator of having previously used at least 1 of the 3 CMS resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among noninstitutionalized beneficiaries (<i>n</i> = 20 715), 4.8% had limited English speaking proficiency, 7.0% had limited English reading proficiency, and 67.7% had used at least 1 CMS resource. After regression adjustment, beneficiaries with limited English reading proficiency were 16.3 percentage points less likely to have used a CMS resource compared to beneficiaries who reported English reading proficiency (<i>p</i> < .001). Limited English speaking proficiency was not associated with CMS resource use.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>These findings suggest that English reading proficiency may be an underappreciated factor in Medicare beneficiaries' use of the Medicare handbook, hotline, and website. Alternative approaches to providing and publicizing informational resources may reduce barriers to Medicare resource use among beneficiaries with limited English reading proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 1","pages":"igae105"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Medicare coverage decisions are complex. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provides a hotline, handbook, and website to help Medicare beneficiaries understand their benefits and coverage options, yet it is unclear what factors affect beneficiary use of these resources. We examined limited English speaking and English reading proficiency status as predictors of CMS Medicare informational resource use in a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries.

Research design and methods: We used 2016-2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data and linear probability models to assess whether the likelihood of using CMS Medicare informational resources differed among beneficiaries with limited English proficiency. We adjusted models for demographic, socioeconomic, health, and local market factors and, in sensitivity analyses, health insurance characteristics. Our primary outcome was an indicator of having previously used at least 1 of the 3 CMS resources.

Results: Among noninstitutionalized beneficiaries (n = 20 715), 4.8% had limited English speaking proficiency, 7.0% had limited English reading proficiency, and 67.7% had used at least 1 CMS resource. After regression adjustment, beneficiaries with limited English reading proficiency were 16.3 percentage points less likely to have used a CMS resource compared to beneficiaries who reported English reading proficiency (p < .001). Limited English speaking proficiency was not associated with CMS resource use.

Discussion and implications: These findings suggest that English reading proficiency may be an underappreciated factor in Medicare beneficiaries' use of the Medicare handbook, hotline, and website. Alternative approaches to providing and publicizing informational resources may reduce barriers to Medicare resource use among beneficiaries with limited English reading proficiency.

背景和目标:医疗保险的承保决策非常复杂。联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)提供了热线电话、手册和网站,帮助联邦医疗保险受益人了解他们的福利和保险选择,但目前尚不清楚哪些因素会影响受益人对这些资源的使用。我们研究了在具有全国代表性的医疗保险受益人样本中,英语水平有限和英语阅读能力状况对 CMS 医疗保险信息资源使用的预测因素:我们使用 2016-2018 年医疗保险当前受益人调查数据和线性概率模型来评估英语水平有限的受益人使用 CMS 医疗保险信息资源的可能性是否存在差异。我们根据人口、社会经济、健康和当地市场因素对模型进行了调整,并在敏感性分析中对医疗保险特征进行了调整。我们的主要结果是曾使用过 CMS 3 种资源中至少 1 种资源的指标:在非住院受益人(20 715 人)中,4.8% 的人英语口语能力有限,7.0% 的人英语阅读能力有限,67.7% 的人至少使用过一种 CMS 资源。经过回归调整后,与英语阅读能力有限的受益人相比,英语阅读能力有限的受益人使用 CMS 资源的可能性要低 16.3 个百分点(p < .001)。英语口语能力有限与 CMS 资源的使用无关:这些研究结果表明,英语阅读能力可能是影响医疗保险受益人使用医疗保险手册、热线电话和网站的一个未被重视的因素。提供和宣传信息资源的其他方法可能会减少英语阅读能力有限的受益人使用医疗保险资源的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信