Beyond genomics: using RNA-seq from dried blood spots to unlock the clinical relevance of splicing variation in a diagnostic setting.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Aida M Bertoli-Avella, Mandy Radefeldt, Ruslan Al-Ali, Luba M Pardo, Sabrina Lemke, Anika Leubauer, Daniel L Polla, Rebecca Hörnicke, Ligia S Almeida, Krishna Kumar Kandaswamy, Christian Beetz, Jorge Pinto Basto, Peter Bauer
{"title":"Beyond genomics: using RNA-seq from dried blood spots to unlock the clinical relevance of splicing variation in a diagnostic setting.","authors":"Aida M Bertoli-Avella, Mandy Radefeldt, Ruslan Al-Ali, Luba M Pardo, Sabrina Lemke, Anika Leubauer, Daniel L Polla, Rebecca Hörnicke, Ligia S Almeida, Krishna Kumar Kandaswamy, Christian Beetz, Jorge Pinto Basto, Peter Bauer","doi":"10.1038/s41431-025-01792-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to assess the impact of splicing variants reported in our laboratory to gain insight into their clinical relevance. A total of 108 consecutive individuals, for whom 113 splicing variants had been reported, were selected for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), considering the gene expression in blood. A protocol was developed to perform RNA extraction and sequencing using the same sample (dried blood spots, DBS) provided for the DNA analysis, including library preparation and bioinformatic pipeline analysis. Splicing in genes of interest was inspected using IGV, with at least three unaffected individuals as controls. From the 113 variants, we confirmed an abnormal splicing in 64 variants (57%). In 15 variants (13%), we did not observe a splicing alteration. In the remaining 34 variants, no decision could be made on the splicing effect due to insufficient sample quality (21%) or a low number of reads (9%). The most common event leading to aberrant splicing was exon skipping, identified in 31 variants (48%). Other events included cryptic donor/acceptor site usage (n = 25; 39%), intron retention (n = 4; 6%), and other complex events (n = 4; 6%). In three patients, pathologically reduced enzymatic activity (measured using the same DBS) served as additional confirmation of the abnormal splicing caused by variants in HEXA, GAA, and GLA. We implemented an RNA-seq pipeline using the same sample provided for genomic testing. This multiomic approach, as implemented in our routine diagnostic processes, clarifies the clinical relevance of most of the analyzed variants and delivers more comprehensive genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12016,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01792-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to assess the impact of splicing variants reported in our laboratory to gain insight into their clinical relevance. A total of 108 consecutive individuals, for whom 113 splicing variants had been reported, were selected for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), considering the gene expression in blood. A protocol was developed to perform RNA extraction and sequencing using the same sample (dried blood spots, DBS) provided for the DNA analysis, including library preparation and bioinformatic pipeline analysis. Splicing in genes of interest was inspected using IGV, with at least three unaffected individuals as controls. From the 113 variants, we confirmed an abnormal splicing in 64 variants (57%). In 15 variants (13%), we did not observe a splicing alteration. In the remaining 34 variants, no decision could be made on the splicing effect due to insufficient sample quality (21%) or a low number of reads (9%). The most common event leading to aberrant splicing was exon skipping, identified in 31 variants (48%). Other events included cryptic donor/acceptor site usage (n = 25; 39%), intron retention (n = 4; 6%), and other complex events (n = 4; 6%). In three patients, pathologically reduced enzymatic activity (measured using the same DBS) served as additional confirmation of the abnormal splicing caused by variants in HEXA, GAA, and GLA. We implemented an RNA-seq pipeline using the same sample provided for genomic testing. This multiomic approach, as implemented in our routine diagnostic processes, clarifies the clinical relevance of most of the analyzed variants and delivers more comprehensive genetic testing.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Genetics
European Journal of Human Genetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
216
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Human Genetics is the official journal of the European Society of Human Genetics, publishing high-quality, original research papers, short reports and reviews in the rapidly expanding field of human genetics and genomics. It covers molecular, clinical and cytogenetics, interfacing between advanced biomedical research and the clinician, and bridging the great diversity of facilities, resources and viewpoints in the genetics community. Key areas include: -Monogenic and multifactorial disorders -Development and malformation -Hereditary cancer -Medical Genomics -Gene mapping and functional studies -Genotype-phenotype correlations -Genetic variation and genome diversity -Statistical and computational genetics -Bioinformatics -Advances in diagnostics -Therapy and prevention -Animal models -Genetic services -Community genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信