Assessment of verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities in children with stuttering using 5th edition Stanford Binet.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rasha Sami, Sherine Ramzy, Ghada Tarek Orabi
{"title":"Assessment of verbal and nonverbal cognitive abilities in children with stuttering using 5th edition Stanford Binet.","authors":"Rasha Sami, Sherine Ramzy, Ghada Tarek Orabi","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2448009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stuttering is a speech disorder disrupting fluency with implications that could affect psychological, educational, social, and occupational aspects of life. Cognitive functions include mental processes that allows for execution of goal-directed responses in different situations. They are usually referred to as executive functions (EF) which consists of three main components, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. The Stanford Binet 5th edition (SB5) is an intelligence scale designed to assess various cognitive skills by measuring five main domains that require the administration of these executive skills. Recent research has focused on executive functions skills among children with stuttering (CWS), and how it might affect stuttering development and severity.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive verbal and nonverbal skills using the Stanford Binet intelligence quotient test 5th edition (SB5) between children with stuttering (CWS) and children with no stuttering (CWNS) and to assess which of these skills affected stuttering severity among CWS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 children, 40 CWS and 30 CWNS, were assessed using the SB5 test. Further assessment of the CWS was done using the stuttering severity index (SSI) to determine the degree of stuttering. Statistical analysis and comparison were used to determine results and differences in cognitive skills, and regressive analysis was used to determine the most predicative factor in stuttering development and severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Showed that CWS performed lower scores than CWNS in all SB5 domains except in non-verbal domain, where the two groups did not differ significantly in their performance. Working memory was the weakest skill among CWS and stood out as the only significant predicative factor in stuttering. Children with severe stuttering performed higher in their total IQ, nonverbal IQ, knowledge, and fluid reasoning than moderate stutterers, having the strongest performance in non-verbal IQ, still none of these domains turned out to be of a predicative significance in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that working memory is the weakest executive skill in CWS as well as other executive functions related to cognitive flexibility compared to fluent controls. Working memory skills are significantly lower in CWS but does not correlate with its severity; whereas the strongest skills, among CWS compared to fluent controls, are in the nonverbal domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2448009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stuttering is a speech disorder disrupting fluency with implications that could affect psychological, educational, social, and occupational aspects of life. Cognitive functions include mental processes that allows for execution of goal-directed responses in different situations. They are usually referred to as executive functions (EF) which consists of three main components, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. The Stanford Binet 5th edition (SB5) is an intelligence scale designed to assess various cognitive skills by measuring five main domains that require the administration of these executive skills. Recent research has focused on executive functions skills among children with stuttering (CWS), and how it might affect stuttering development and severity.

Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare the cognitive verbal and nonverbal skills using the Stanford Binet intelligence quotient test 5th edition (SB5) between children with stuttering (CWS) and children with no stuttering (CWNS) and to assess which of these skills affected stuttering severity among CWS.

Methods: A total of 70 children, 40 CWS and 30 CWNS, were assessed using the SB5 test. Further assessment of the CWS was done using the stuttering severity index (SSI) to determine the degree of stuttering. Statistical analysis and comparison were used to determine results and differences in cognitive skills, and regressive analysis was used to determine the most predicative factor in stuttering development and severity.

Results: Showed that CWS performed lower scores than CWNS in all SB5 domains except in non-verbal domain, where the two groups did not differ significantly in their performance. Working memory was the weakest skill among CWS and stood out as the only significant predicative factor in stuttering. Children with severe stuttering performed higher in their total IQ, nonverbal IQ, knowledge, and fluid reasoning than moderate stutterers, having the strongest performance in non-verbal IQ, still none of these domains turned out to be of a predicative significance in severity.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that working memory is the weakest executive skill in CWS as well as other executive functions related to cognitive flexibility compared to fluent controls. Working memory skills are significantly lower in CWS but does not correlate with its severity; whereas the strongest skills, among CWS compared to fluent controls, are in the nonverbal domains.

使用第五版Stanford Binet评估口吃儿童的言语和非言语认知能力。
口吃是一种言语障碍,会影响到心理、教育、社会和职业生活的方方面面。认知功能包括允许在不同情况下执行目标导向反应的心理过程。它们通常被称为执行功能(EF),它由三个主要组成部分组成:工作记忆、认知灵活性和抑制控制。斯坦福Binet第五版(SB5)是一种智力量表,旨在通过测量需要管理这些执行技能的五个主要领域来评估各种认知技能。最近的研究主要集中在口吃儿童的执行功能技能,以及它如何影响口吃的发展和严重程度。研究目的:本研究的目的是使用斯坦福比奈智商测试(SB5)比较口吃儿童(CWS)和非口吃儿童(CWNS)的认知语言和非语言技能,并评估哪些技能影响口吃儿童(CWS)的口吃严重程度。方法:采用SB5量表对70例患儿进行评估,其中CWS患儿40例,cns患儿30例。使用口吃严重程度指数(SSI)对CWS进行进一步评估,以确定口吃的程度。采用统计分析和比较来确定结果和认知技能的差异,采用回归分析来确定最能预测口吃发展和严重程度的因素。结果显示,除非语言领域外,CWS在所有SB5领域的得分均低于CWNS,两组在非语言领域的表现无显著差异。工作记忆是CWS中最弱的技能,是唯一显著的预测口吃的因素。重度口吃儿童在总智商、非语言智商、知识和流畅推理方面比中度口吃儿童表现更高,在非语言智商方面表现最强,但这些领域在严重程度上都没有预测意义。结论:与流利控制相比,工作记忆和其他与认知灵活性相关的执行功能是CWS中最弱的执行技能。CWS患者的工作记忆能力显著降低,但与严重程度无关;然而,与流利的控制相比,CWS中最强的技能是在非语言领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信