Prevalence estimates and nature of online child sexual exploitation and abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Deborah Fry, Anna Krzeczkowska, Jungru Ren, Mengyao Lu, Xiangming Fang
{"title":"Prevalence estimates and nature of online child sexual exploitation and abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Deborah Fry, Anna Krzeczkowska, Jungru Ren, Mengyao Lu, Xiangming Fang","doi":"10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00329-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA) is a global health issue. The aim of this global systematic review and meta-analysis was to better understand the prevalence and nature of OCSEA on a global scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive literature searches were done in six UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish) and multiple databases, for records published between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 30, 2023. Studies were evaluated independently by two different authors for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included children younger than 18 years or adults retrospectively reporting OCSEA. Studies used general population samples and were representative at the national and sub-national level. Risk of bias in prevalence studies was assessed and a synthesis of the findings produced. A random-effects model was conducted for meta-analysis of studies to calculate prevalence estimates with 95% CIs for past year recall and lifetime recall of four OCSEA subtypes and overall OCSEA (from studies that measured at least three different sub-types within the same sample). This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/6vux2).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 47 097 records derived from literature searches, 86 records reporting on 123 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled mean prevalence for past year recall of OCSEA subtypes was estimated: online solicitation (12·5% [95% CI 10·5-14·7]); non-consensual taking, sharing, and exposure to sexual images and videos (12·6% [9·7-16·2]); online sexual exploitation (4·7% [2·9-7·3]); and sexual extortion (3·5% [1·9-6·4]). The mean prevalence of past-year recall for overall OCSEA was 8·1% (4·9-13·0). Heterogeneity of individual estimates was high, influenced by research design factors including the method of data collection and variability in definitions used.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Heterogeneity in prevalence estimates identified across studies and regions indicates that more research is required to draw stronger conclusions about the scale of OCSEA. However, the findings of this study are of great relevance to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers to make informed decisions about allocating resources and designing effective prevention and response programmes to protect children worldwide.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Human Dignity Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94246,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00329-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online child sexual exploitation and abuse (OCSEA) is a global health issue. The aim of this global systematic review and meta-analysis was to better understand the prevalence and nature of OCSEA on a global scale.

Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were done in six UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish) and multiple databases, for records published between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 30, 2023. Studies were evaluated independently by two different authors for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included children younger than 18 years or adults retrospectively reporting OCSEA. Studies used general population samples and were representative at the national and sub-national level. Risk of bias in prevalence studies was assessed and a synthesis of the findings produced. A random-effects model was conducted for meta-analysis of studies to calculate prevalence estimates with 95% CIs for past year recall and lifetime recall of four OCSEA subtypes and overall OCSEA (from studies that measured at least three different sub-types within the same sample). This study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework (osf.io/6vux2).

Findings: Of the 47 097 records derived from literature searches, 86 records reporting on 123 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled mean prevalence for past year recall of OCSEA subtypes was estimated: online solicitation (12·5% [95% CI 10·5-14·7]); non-consensual taking, sharing, and exposure to sexual images and videos (12·6% [9·7-16·2]); online sexual exploitation (4·7% [2·9-7·3]); and sexual extortion (3·5% [1·9-6·4]). The mean prevalence of past-year recall for overall OCSEA was 8·1% (4·9-13·0). Heterogeneity of individual estimates was high, influenced by research design factors including the method of data collection and variability in definitions used.

Interpretation: Heterogeneity in prevalence estimates identified across studies and regions indicates that more research is required to draw stronger conclusions about the scale of OCSEA. However, the findings of this study are of great relevance to policy makers, practitioners, and researchers to make informed decisions about allocating resources and designing effective prevention and response programmes to protect children worldwide.

Funding: The Human Dignity Foundation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信