Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a teaching questionnaire measuring facilitator competencies and characteristics of interprofessional clinical educators in an Asian setting.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amelia Dwi Fitri, Ardi Findyartini, Diantha Soemantri, Rita Mustika, Anwar Santoso, Mora Claramita, Sri Linuwih Menaldi
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a teaching questionnaire measuring facilitator competencies and characteristics of interprofessional clinical educators in an Asian setting.","authors":"Amelia Dwi Fitri, Ardi Findyartini, Diantha Soemantri, Rita Mustika, Anwar Santoso, Mora Claramita, Sri Linuwih Menaldi","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2452972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to validate an Indonesian version of the teaching questionnaire measuring the competencies of interprofessional education (IPE) facilitators and the characteristics of good clinical educators described by Kerry et al. (2021). A cross-cultural adaptation was developed and consisted of the following steps: forward-backward translation, content validity index measurement, cognitive interviews and a pilot study to measure content validity and reliability, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify the new dimensionality, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the measurement model. The pilot study results confirmed that the Indonesian version of the questionnaire assessing teaching competencies had good internal consistency (ω= .74 for the competencies of facilitators and ω= .88 for the characteristics of good clinical educators). The questionnaire was then administered to 209 clinical educators from five health professions. The EFA revealed two factors for the competencies (ω1= .86, ω2 = .70) and one factor for the characteristics of good IPE clinical educators (ω= .90). The CFA showed that the proposed model had a good fit with the observed data with (chi-square test: <i>p</i> > .05; CMIN/df, TLI, CFI, GFI, and AGFI were within the expected ranges; and RMSEA approximately .05).</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2452972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to validate an Indonesian version of the teaching questionnaire measuring the competencies of interprofessional education (IPE) facilitators and the characteristics of good clinical educators described by Kerry et al. (2021). A cross-cultural adaptation was developed and consisted of the following steps: forward-backward translation, content validity index measurement, cognitive interviews and a pilot study to measure content validity and reliability, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify the new dimensionality, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the measurement model. The pilot study results confirmed that the Indonesian version of the questionnaire assessing teaching competencies had good internal consistency (ω= .74 for the competencies of facilitators and ω= .88 for the characteristics of good clinical educators). The questionnaire was then administered to 209 clinical educators from five health professions. The EFA revealed two factors for the competencies (ω1= .86, ω2 = .70) and one factor for the characteristics of good IPE clinical educators (ω= .90). The CFA showed that the proposed model had a good fit with the observed data with (chi-square test: p > .05; CMIN/df, TLI, CFI, GFI, and AGFI were within the expected ranges; and RMSEA approximately .05).

跨文化适应与亚洲背景下跨专业临床教育工作者促进能力与特征的教学问卷验证。
本研究旨在验证印尼版的教学问卷,该问卷测量了Kerry等人(2021)描述的跨专业教育(IPE)促进者的能力和优秀临床教育工作者的特征。跨文化适应研究包括以下步骤:前向向后翻译、内容效度指标测量、认知访谈和测量内容效度和信度的试点研究、探索性因子分析(EFA)以识别新的维度、验证性因子分析(CFA)以确认测量模型。试点研究结果证实,印尼版的评估教学能力的问卷具有良好的内部一致性(ω= 0.74关于辅导员的能力,ω= 0.88关于优秀临床教育者的特征)。然后对来自五个卫生专业的209名临床教育工作者进行问卷调查。EFA揭示了两个影响因素(ω1= 0.86, ω2 = 0.70)和一个影响因素(ω= 0.90)。CFA检验表明,该模型与观测数据拟合良好(卡方检验:p < 0.05;CMIN/df、TLI、CFI、GFI、AGFI均在预期范围内;RMSEA约为0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信