Impact of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody positivity on infection and hospitalisation rates in immunosuppressed populations during the omicron period: the MELODY study

Lisa Mumford, Rachel Hogg, Adam Taylor, Peter Lanyon, Mary Bythell, Sean McPhail, Joseph Chilcot, Gillian Powter, Graham S Cooke, Helen Ward, Helen Thomas, Stephen P McAdoo, Liz Lightstone, Sean H Lim, Gavin J Pettigrew, Fiona A Pearce, Michelle Willicombe
{"title":"Impact of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody positivity on infection and hospitalisation rates in immunosuppressed populations during the omicron period: the MELODY study","authors":"Lisa Mumford, Rachel Hogg, Adam Taylor, Peter Lanyon, Mary Bythell, Sean McPhail, Joseph Chilcot, Gillian Powter, Graham S Cooke, Helen Ward, Helen Thomas, Stephen P McAdoo, Liz Lightstone, Sean H Lim, Gavin J Pettigrew, Fiona A Pearce, Michelle Willicombe","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02560-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>In the UK, booster COVID-19 vaccinations have been recommended biannually to people considered immune vulnerable. We investigated, at a population level, whether the absence of detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibody (anti-S Ab) following three or more vaccinations in immunosuppressed individuals was associated with greater risks of infection and severity of infection.<h3>Methods</h3>In this prospective cohort study using UK national disease registers, we recruited participants with solid organ transplants (SOTs), rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RAIRDs), and lymphoid malignancies. All participants were tested for anti-S Ab using a lateral flow immunoassay, completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and were followed up for 6 months using linked data from the National Health Service in England. SARS-CoV-2 infection was primarily defined using UK Health Security Agency data and supplemented with hospitalisation and therapeutics data, and hospitalisation due to SARS-CoV-2 was defined as an admission within 14 days of a positive test.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Dec 7, 2021, and June 26, 2022, we recruited 21 575 participants. Anti-S Ab was detected in 6519 (77·0%) of 8466 participants with SOTs, 5594 (85·9%) of 6516 with RAIRDs, and 5227 (79·3%) of 6593 with lymphoid malignancies. COVID-19 infection was recorded in 3907 (18·5%) participants, with 556 requiring a COVID-19-related hospital admission and 17 dying within 28 days of infection. Rates of infection varied by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics but, in adjusted analysis, having detectable anti-S Ab was independently associated with a reduced incidence of infection, with incident rate ratios (IRRs) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·65–0·73) in the SOT cohort, 0·57 (0·49–0·67) in the RAIRD cohort, and 0·62 (0·54–0·71) in the lymphoid malignancy cohort. In adjusted analysis, having detectable anti-S Ab was also associated with a reduced incidence of hospitalisation, with IRRs of 0·40 (0·35–0·46) in the SOT cohort, 0·32 (0·22–0·46) in the RAIRD cohort, and 0·41 (0·29–0·58) in the lymphoid malignancy cohort.<h3>Interpretation</h3>All people with immunosuppression require ongoing access to COVID-19 protection strategies. Assessment of anti-S Ab responses, which can be performed at scale, can identify people with immunosuppression who remain most at risk, providing a mechanism to further individualise protection approaches.<h3>Funding</h3>UK Research and Innovation, Kidney Research UK, Blood Cancer UK, Vasculitis UK, and Cystic Fibrosis Trust.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02560-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the UK, booster COVID-19 vaccinations have been recommended biannually to people considered immune vulnerable. We investigated, at a population level, whether the absence of detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibody (anti-S Ab) following three or more vaccinations in immunosuppressed individuals was associated with greater risks of infection and severity of infection.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study using UK national disease registers, we recruited participants with solid organ transplants (SOTs), rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RAIRDs), and lymphoid malignancies. All participants were tested for anti-S Ab using a lateral flow immunoassay, completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and were followed up for 6 months using linked data from the National Health Service in England. SARS-CoV-2 infection was primarily defined using UK Health Security Agency data and supplemented with hospitalisation and therapeutics data, and hospitalisation due to SARS-CoV-2 was defined as an admission within 14 days of a positive test.

Findings

Between Dec 7, 2021, and June 26, 2022, we recruited 21 575 participants. Anti-S Ab was detected in 6519 (77·0%) of 8466 participants with SOTs, 5594 (85·9%) of 6516 with RAIRDs, and 5227 (79·3%) of 6593 with lymphoid malignancies. COVID-19 infection was recorded in 3907 (18·5%) participants, with 556 requiring a COVID-19-related hospital admission and 17 dying within 28 days of infection. Rates of infection varied by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics but, in adjusted analysis, having detectable anti-S Ab was independently associated with a reduced incidence of infection, with incident rate ratios (IRRs) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·65–0·73) in the SOT cohort, 0·57 (0·49–0·67) in the RAIRD cohort, and 0·62 (0·54–0·71) in the lymphoid malignancy cohort. In adjusted analysis, having detectable anti-S Ab was also associated with a reduced incidence of hospitalisation, with IRRs of 0·40 (0·35–0·46) in the SOT cohort, 0·32 (0·22–0·46) in the RAIRD cohort, and 0·41 (0·29–0·58) in the lymphoid malignancy cohort.

Interpretation

All people with immunosuppression require ongoing access to COVID-19 protection strategies. Assessment of anti-S Ab responses, which can be performed at scale, can identify people with immunosuppression who remain most at risk, providing a mechanism to further individualise protection approaches.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation, Kidney Research UK, Blood Cancer UK, Vasculitis UK, and Cystic Fibrosis Trust.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信