Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Non-Industrial Spaces: A Summary of Emissions Evaluations in 11 School Settings

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jessica F. Li, Eric K. Glassford
{"title":"Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Non-Industrial Spaces: A Summary of Emissions Evaluations in 11 School Settings","authors":"Jessica F. Li,&nbsp;Eric K. Glassford","doi":"10.1111/josh.13541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Additive manufacturing or 3-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology with increasing prevalence in non-industrial settings such as university and school settings. However, printers are often located in spaces not designed for this purpose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>3D-printer use in 11 university and K-12 schools was evaluated by identifying emissions using area air sampling for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particle counting instruments (PCIs) measuring ultrafine particulate (UFP) and evaluating controls to reduce potential exposure. Ventilation in printer locations was also characterized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>VOCs and UFP were identified during 3D printing. Best-practice recommendations were provided to school health and safety staff to protect users, including workers and students. Recommendations included installing and implementing engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure to 3D printer emissions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>School health and safety staff can translate findings and recommendations for these 11 evaluations to identify 3D-printing areas on their campuses and use principles of industrial hygiene to protect workers and students and prevent the movement of emissions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>VOCs and UFP were detected during 3D printing. There were opportunities to improve health and safety practices and reduce potential exposure when using 3D printing technologies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":"95 4-5","pages":"307-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Additive manufacturing or 3-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology with increasing prevalence in non-industrial settings such as university and school settings. However, printers are often located in spaces not designed for this purpose.

Methods

3D-printer use in 11 university and K-12 schools was evaluated by identifying emissions using area air sampling for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particle counting instruments (PCIs) measuring ultrafine particulate (UFP) and evaluating controls to reduce potential exposure. Ventilation in printer locations was also characterized.

Results

VOCs and UFP were identified during 3D printing. Best-practice recommendations were provided to school health and safety staff to protect users, including workers and students. Recommendations included installing and implementing engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure to 3D printer emissions.

Implications

School health and safety staff can translate findings and recommendations for these 11 evaluations to identify 3D-printing areas on their campuses and use principles of industrial hygiene to protect workers and students and prevent the movement of emissions.

Conclusions

VOCs and UFP were detected during 3D printing. There were opportunities to improve health and safety practices and reduce potential exposure when using 3D printing technologies.

非工业空间的三维(3D)打印:11所学校环境的排放评估综述。
背景:增材制造或三维(3D)打印是一项新兴技术,在大学和学校等非工业环境中日益普及。然而,打印机通常位于不是为此目的而设计的空间。方法:通过使用区域空气采样识别挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)和颗粒计数仪器(PCIs)测量超细颗粒物(UFP)并评估控制措施以减少潜在暴露,对11所大学和K-12学校的3d打印机使用情况进行了评估。打印机位置的通风也有特点。结果:3D打印过程中检测到VOCs和UFP。向学校卫生和安全工作人员提供了最佳做法建议,以保护用户,包括工人和学生。建议包括安装和实施工程控制、行政控制和个人防护装备(PPE),以最大限度地减少3D打印机排放。影响:学校卫生和安全工作人员可以翻译这11项评估的结果和建议,以确定校园内的3d打印区域,并使用工业卫生原则来保护工人和学生,防止排放物的流动。结论:3D打印过程中检测到了VOCs和UFP。在使用3D打印技术时,有机会改善健康和安全实践,并减少潜在的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信