Partnership Preferences in Modern Migration Societies: Religious Homophily Among Young Muslims and Christians in Germany.

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Stefanie Heyne, Jana Kuhlemann, Irena Kogan
{"title":"Partnership Preferences in Modern Migration Societies: Religious Homophily Among Young Muslims and Christians in Germany.","authors":"Stefanie Heyne, Jana Kuhlemann, Irena Kogan","doi":"10.1007/s10680-024-09728-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preferences for homogamous partnerships, not only in terms of having a partner with the same ethnicity, but one with the same religion, are an important factor in explaining low levels of interethnic partnerships in Western countries. However, previous research has rarely explicitly focused on the role of preferences for partnership formation patterns. Using data from a factorial survey experiment, which was implemented in the 9th wave of the \"Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries\" among young adults in Germany (CILS4EU-DE), this study explores patterns of religious homophily in partnership preferences among young adults in Germany. It thereby specifically focuses on individuals belonging to two major religious groups: Christians and Muslims. It investigates the effects of religious denomination, religiosity, type of intimate partnership, and gender differences for religious homophily in partnership preferences. Both male and female respondents were found to prefer partners of the same religious denomination, with this effect being stronger among Muslims than Christians. Muslim respondents showed no or little disapproval of more strongly religious partners, whereas Christian respondents showed strong disapproval of more religious partners. Among Christian and male Muslim but not among female Muslim respondents, preferences for religious homophily were lower for casual partnerships than for marriage. Overall, the findings suggest that religious homophily and religion play an important part in shaping partnership choices among young Christian and Muslim adults in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":51496,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","volume":"41 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-024-09728-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preferences for homogamous partnerships, not only in terms of having a partner with the same ethnicity, but one with the same religion, are an important factor in explaining low levels of interethnic partnerships in Western countries. However, previous research has rarely explicitly focused on the role of preferences for partnership formation patterns. Using data from a factorial survey experiment, which was implemented in the 9th wave of the "Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries" among young adults in Germany (CILS4EU-DE), this study explores patterns of religious homophily in partnership preferences among young adults in Germany. It thereby specifically focuses on individuals belonging to two major religious groups: Christians and Muslims. It investigates the effects of religious denomination, religiosity, type of intimate partnership, and gender differences for religious homophily in partnership preferences. Both male and female respondents were found to prefer partners of the same religious denomination, with this effect being stronger among Muslims than Christians. Muslim respondents showed no or little disapproval of more strongly religious partners, whereas Christian respondents showed strong disapproval of more religious partners. Among Christian and male Muslim but not among female Muslim respondents, preferences for religious homophily were lower for casual partnerships than for marriage. Overall, the findings suggest that religious homophily and religion play an important part in shaping partnership choices among young Christian and Muslim adults in Germany.

现代移民社会中的伙伴关系偏好:德国年轻穆斯林和基督徒的宗教同一性。
对同性伴侣关系的偏好,不仅体现在伴侣具有相同的种族,而且体现在伴侣具有相同的宗教信仰,是解释西方国家种族间伴侣关系水平较低的一个重要因素。然而,以往的研究很少明确关注偏好对伙伴关系形成模式的作用。本研究利用德国青年“欧洲四国移民子女纵向调查”(CILS4EU-DE)第九波调查中实施的因子调查实验数据,探讨了德国青年伴侣偏好中宗教同质性的模式。因此,它特别关注属于两大宗教团体的个人:基督徒和穆斯林。它调查了宗教教派、宗教信仰、亲密伙伴关系类型和性别差异对伙伴关系偏好中宗教同质性的影响。调查发现,男性和女性受访者都更喜欢同一宗教派别的伴侣,这种影响在穆斯林中比在基督徒中更强烈。穆斯林受访者对宗教信仰更强烈的伴侣没有或很少表示反对,而基督徒受访者则对宗教信仰更强烈的伴侣表示强烈反对。在基督徒和男性穆斯林受访者中,而不是女性穆斯林受访者中,对宗教同性恋的偏好在偶然的伴侣关系中低于对婚姻的偏好。总体而言,调查结果表明,宗教同一性和宗教信仰在影响德国年轻基督徒和穆斯林成年人的伴侣选择方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: European Journal of Population addresses a broad public of researchers, policy makers and others concerned with population processes and their consequences. Its aim is to improve understanding of population phenomena by giving priority to work that contributes to the development of theory and method, and that spans the boundaries between demography and such disciplines as sociology, anthropology, economics, geography, history, political science, epidemiology and other sciences contributing to public health. The Journal is open to authors from all over the world, and its articles cover European and non-European countries (specifically including developing countries) alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信