National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.14245/ns.2448624.312
Jacob R Ball, Matthew C Gallo, Kareem Kebaish, Nicole Hang, Andy Ton, Fergui Hernandez, Marc Abdou, William J Karakash, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram K Alluri
{"title":"National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.","authors":"Jacob R Ball, Matthew C Gallo, Kareem Kebaish, Nicole Hang, Andy Ton, Fergui Hernandez, Marc Abdou, William J Karakash, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram K Alluri","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448624.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to describe utilization, demographics, complications, and revisions for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis undergoing decompression or decompression with fusion in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national insurance database was used to identify patients who underwent either decompression and fusion or decompression alone for management of DS from 2010-2022. Utilization trends, demographics, and complications for each procedure were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 162,878 patients were identified, of which 78,043 patients underwent combined single-level lumbar decompression and fusion and 84,835 underwent single-level lumbar decompression alone. Between 2010-2021, lumbar decompression and fusion became the predominant surgical intervention for DS in 2016 and continued to account for more than half of all procedures during the remainder of the study period. Factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, geographic region, and physician specialty training were associated with procedure choice. Decompression with fusion was associated with a lower risk of revision surgery up to 5 years postoperatively and an overall lower incidence of 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decompression with fusion has become the most common treatment for lumbar DS over the past decade despite a lack of compelling evidence supporting its use compared to decompression alone. A variety of patient and surgeon-specific factors is associated with procedure choice. After accounting for cofounders, we identified treatment-specific complications that may be valuable when counseling patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"21 4","pages":"1068-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448624.312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe utilization, demographics, complications, and revisions for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis undergoing decompression or decompression with fusion in the United States.

Methods: A national insurance database was used to identify patients who underwent either decompression and fusion or decompression alone for management of DS from 2010-2022. Utilization trends, demographics, and complications for each procedure were compared.

Results: A total of 162,878 patients were identified, of which 78,043 patients underwent combined single-level lumbar decompression and fusion and 84,835 underwent single-level lumbar decompression alone. Between 2010-2021, lumbar decompression and fusion became the predominant surgical intervention for DS in 2016 and continued to account for more than half of all procedures during the remainder of the study period. Factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, geographic region, and physician specialty training were associated with procedure choice. Decompression with fusion was associated with a lower risk of revision surgery up to 5 years postoperatively and an overall lower incidence of 30-day complications.

Conclusion: Decompression with fusion has become the most common treatment for lumbar DS over the past decade despite a lack of compelling evidence supporting its use compared to decompression alone. A variety of patient and surgeon-specific factors is associated with procedure choice. After accounting for cofounders, we identified treatment-specific complications that may be valuable when counseling patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腰椎退行性椎体滑脱伴狭窄行融合与减压治疗的全国趋势。
目的:本研究的目的是描述在美国接受减压或减压融合的退行性椎体滑脱(DS)狭窄患者的使用情况、人口统计学、并发症和修复。方法:使用国家保险数据库识别2010-2022年期间接受减压融合或单独减压治疗DS的患者。比较了每种手术的使用趋势、人口统计和并发症。结果:共纳入162,878例患者,其中78,043例患者行单节段腰椎减压融合术,84,835例患者行单节段腰椎减压术。在2010-2021年期间,腰椎减压融合成为2016年退行性椎体滑移的主要手术干预措施,并在研究剩余期间继续占所有手术的一半以上。年龄、性别、合并症、地理区域和医师专业培训等因素与手术选择有关。减压融合术后5年内翻修手术的风险较低,30天并发症的总体发生率较低。结论:在过去的十年中,减压融合已成为腰椎退行性椎体滑移最常见的治疗方法,尽管与单纯减压相比缺乏有力的证据支持其使用。多种患者和外科医生的特定因素与手术选择有关。在考虑了联合创始人之后,我们确定了治疗特异性并发症,这在咨询患者时可能是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信