Zahira Ali, Asmara Malik, Jahanzeb Malik, Tooba Fida, Uzma Ishaq, Amna Ashraf, Saqlain Ahmed, Ali Karim, Allah Warayo, Waheed Akhtar
{"title":"Monkeypox Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Workers in Pakistan.","authors":"Zahira Ali, Asmara Malik, Jahanzeb Malik, Tooba Fida, Uzma Ishaq, Amna Ashraf, Saqlain Ahmed, Ali Karim, Allah Warayo, Waheed Akhtar","doi":"10.55729/2000-9666.1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate healthcare workers (HCWs) acceptance of the HMPXV vaccine in Pakistan and identify influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 4257 HCWs assessed vaccine acceptance across demographics, ethnicity, marital status, specialty, medical conditions, and education. Logistic regression identified predictors of acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall HMPXV vaccine acceptance among HCWs was 73.1%. The gender distribution shows that a majority of participants are female (56.60%) while males constitute 43.40% of the sample. Interestingly, vaccine acceptance is higher among females (68.43%) compared to males (31.57%). Ethnicity in the sample reveals that Punjabi participants are the most common at 45.25%, followed by Pashtun (26.06%), Sindhi (14.41%), Balochi (12.72%), and Other (1.46%). Age categories are compared to the 18-30 age group. The odds of vaccine acceptance are lower for individuals aged 31-40 (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.25) and for those over 60 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.41-0.97). Conversely, the odds are higher for those aged 41-50 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.27-3.01) and 51-60 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.19-1.67). Gender comparison reveals that females have higher odds of vaccine acceptance (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.21-1.24) than males. Among ethnicities, Sindhi participants (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.23-1.88) have slightly higher odds of vaccine acceptance than Punjabi participants. Marital status doesn't significantly influence vaccine acceptance, but married individuals have slightly higher odds (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.87-5.06). In terms of specialty, Surgery/Allied professionals have lower odds of vaccine acceptance (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13-1.70) compared to Medicine/Allied professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strategies addressing demographic disparities and countering misinformation are crucial for enhancing HMPXV vaccine uptake among HCWs. Targeted interventions are necessary for effective vaccination coverage in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","volume":"14 6","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate healthcare workers (HCWs) acceptance of the HMPXV vaccine in Pakistan and identify influencing factors.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 4257 HCWs assessed vaccine acceptance across demographics, ethnicity, marital status, specialty, medical conditions, and education. Logistic regression identified predictors of acceptance.
Results: The overall HMPXV vaccine acceptance among HCWs was 73.1%. The gender distribution shows that a majority of participants are female (56.60%) while males constitute 43.40% of the sample. Interestingly, vaccine acceptance is higher among females (68.43%) compared to males (31.57%). Ethnicity in the sample reveals that Punjabi participants are the most common at 45.25%, followed by Pashtun (26.06%), Sindhi (14.41%), Balochi (12.72%), and Other (1.46%). Age categories are compared to the 18-30 age group. The odds of vaccine acceptance are lower for individuals aged 31-40 (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.25) and for those over 60 (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.41-0.97). Conversely, the odds are higher for those aged 41-50 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.27-3.01) and 51-60 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.19-1.67). Gender comparison reveals that females have higher odds of vaccine acceptance (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.21-1.24) than males. Among ethnicities, Sindhi participants (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.23-1.88) have slightly higher odds of vaccine acceptance than Punjabi participants. Marital status doesn't significantly influence vaccine acceptance, but married individuals have slightly higher odds (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.87-5.06). In terms of specialty, Surgery/Allied professionals have lower odds of vaccine acceptance (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13-1.70) compared to Medicine/Allied professionals.
Conclusion: Strategies addressing demographic disparities and countering misinformation are crucial for enhancing HMPXV vaccine uptake among HCWs. Targeted interventions are necessary for effective vaccination coverage in healthcare settings.
目的:本研究旨在调查巴基斯坦卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对HMPXV疫苗的接受程度并确定影响因素。方法:对4257名卫生保健工作者进行横断面调查,评估其人口统计学、种族、婚姻状况、专科、医疗条件和教育程度。逻辑回归确定了接受的预测因素。结果:HMPXV疫苗接受率为73.1%。从性别分布来看,大多数参与者是女性(56.60%),男性占43.40%。有趣的是,女性接受疫苗的比例(68.43%)高于男性(31.57%)。样本中的种族显示,旁遮普参与者最常见,占45.25%,其次是普什图人(26.06%),信德人(14.41%),俾路支人(12.72%)和其他(1.46%)。年龄类别与18-30岁年龄组进行比较。31-40岁人群接受疫苗的几率较低(OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.25), 60岁以上人群接受疫苗的几率较低(OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.41-0.97)。相反,41-50岁人群(OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.27-3.01)和51-60岁人群(OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.19-1.67)的患病几率更高。性别比较显示,女性接受疫苗的几率(OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.21-1.24)高于男性。在种族中,信德参与者(OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.23-1.88)接受疫苗的几率略高于旁遮普参与者。婚姻状况对疫苗接受度没有显著影响,但已婚个体的几率略高(OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.87-5.06)。就专业而言,与医学/联合专业人员相比,外科/联合专业人员接受疫苗的几率较低(OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13-1.70)。结论:解决人口差异和打击错误信息的策略对于提高HMPXV疫苗在卫生保健工作者中的接种率至关重要。有针对性的干预措施对于卫生保健机构有效的疫苗接种覆盖率是必要的。
期刊介绍:
JCHIMP provides: up-to-date information in the field of Internal Medicine to community hospital medical professionals a platform for clinical faculty, residents, and medical students to publish research relevant to community hospital programs. Manuscripts that explore aspects of medicine at community hospitals welcome, including but not limited to: the best practices of community academic programs community hospital-based research opinion and insight from community hospital leadership and faculty the scholarly work of residents and medical students affiliated with community hospitals.