Baseline dependent differences in the perception of changes in visuomotor delay.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1495592
Gesche Vigh, Jakub Limanowski
{"title":"Baseline dependent differences in the perception of changes in visuomotor delay.","authors":"Gesche Vigh, Jakub Limanowski","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1495592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detection of, and adaptation to delayed visual movement feedback has been extensively studied. One important open question is whether the Weber-Fechner Laws hold in the domain of visuomotor delay; i.e., whether the perception of changes in visuomotor delay depends on the amount of delay already present during movement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this, we developed a virtual reality based, continuous hand movement task, during which participants had to detect changes in visuomotor mapping (delay): Participants (<i>N</i> = 40) performed continuous, auditory-paced grasping movements, which were measured with a data glove and transmitted to a virtual hand model. The movements of the virtual hand were delayed between 0 and 700 ms with the delay changing repeatedly in a roving oddball design. Participants had to indicate any perceived delay changes by key press. This design allowed us to investigate detection accuracy and speed related to the magnitude of the delay change, and to the \"baseline\" delay present during movement, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, larger delay changes were detected more accurately than smaller ones. Surprisingly, delay changes were detected more accurately and faster when participants moved under large > small delays.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results suggest that visual movement feedback delay indeed affects the detection of changes in visuomotor delay, but not as predicted by the Weber-Fechner Laws. Instead, bodily action under small delays may have entailed a larger tolerance for delay changes due to embodiment-related intersensory conflict attenuation; whereas better change detection at large delays may have resulted from their (visual) saliency due to a strong violation of visuomotor predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1495592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1495592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The detection of, and adaptation to delayed visual movement feedback has been extensively studied. One important open question is whether the Weber-Fechner Laws hold in the domain of visuomotor delay; i.e., whether the perception of changes in visuomotor delay depends on the amount of delay already present during movement.

Methods: To address this, we developed a virtual reality based, continuous hand movement task, during which participants had to detect changes in visuomotor mapping (delay): Participants (N = 40) performed continuous, auditory-paced grasping movements, which were measured with a data glove and transmitted to a virtual hand model. The movements of the virtual hand were delayed between 0 and 700 ms with the delay changing repeatedly in a roving oddball design. Participants had to indicate any perceived delay changes by key press. This design allowed us to investigate detection accuracy and speed related to the magnitude of the delay change, and to the "baseline" delay present during movement, respectively.

Results: As expected, larger delay changes were detected more accurately than smaller ones. Surprisingly, delay changes were detected more accurately and faster when participants moved under large > small delays.

Discussion: These results suggest that visual movement feedback delay indeed affects the detection of changes in visuomotor delay, but not as predicted by the Weber-Fechner Laws. Instead, bodily action under small delays may have entailed a larger tolerance for delay changes due to embodiment-related intersensory conflict attenuation; whereas better change detection at large delays may have resulted from their (visual) saliency due to a strong violation of visuomotor predictions.

视运动延迟变化感知的基线依赖性差异。
延迟视觉运动反馈的检测和适应已经得到了广泛的研究。一个重要的开放性问题是韦伯-费希纳定律是否适用于视觉运动延迟领域;也就是说,视觉运动延迟变化的感知是否取决于运动中已经存在的延迟量。方法:为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个基于虚拟现实的连续手部运动任务,在此过程中,参与者必须检测视觉运动映射的变化(延迟):参与者(N = 40)进行连续的、听觉节奏的抓取动作,这些动作用数据手套测量并传输到虚拟手模型中。虚拟手的运动延迟在0 ~ 700 ms之间,并且延迟在漫游奇球设计中反复变化。参与者必须通过按键来指示任何感知到的延迟变化。这种设计使我们能够分别研究与延迟变化幅度和运动过程中存在的“基线”延迟相关的检测精度和速度。结果:正如预期的那样,较大的延迟变化比较小的延迟变化更准确地被检测到。令人惊讶的是,当参与者在大或小的延迟下移动时,延迟变化被检测得更准确、更快。讨论:这些结果表明,视觉运动反馈延迟确实影响视觉运动延迟变化的检测,但不像韦伯-费希纳定律所预测的那样。相反,由于体现相关的感觉间冲突衰减,小延迟下的身体动作可能需要更大的延迟变化容忍度;然而,在大延迟时更好的变化检测可能是由于它们的(视觉)显着性,这是由于视觉运动预测的强烈违反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信