Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2, study

Richard S Finn, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Chih-Hung Hsu, Daneng Li, Adam M Burgoyne, Christopher Cotter, Shreya Badhrinarayanan, Yulei Wang, Anqi Yin, Tirupathi Rao Edubilli, Sami Mahrus, Matthew H Secrest, Colby S Shemesh, Nancy Yu, Stephen P Hack, Edward Cha, Ed Gane
{"title":"Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2, study","authors":"Richard S Finn, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Chih-Hung Hsu, Daneng Li, Adam M Burgoyne, Christopher Cotter, Shreya Badhrinarayanan, Yulei Wang, Anqi Yin, Tirupathi Rao Edubilli, Sami Mahrus, Matthew H Secrest, Colby S Shemesh, Nancy Yu, Stephen P Hack, Edward Cha, Ed Gane","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00679-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>PD-L1 and VEGF blockade with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been shown to improve survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. TIGIT is an immune checkpoint regulator implicated in many cancers, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we evaluate the clinical activity and safety of the addition of tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody, to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.<h3>Methods</h3>This randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2 umbrella study was conducted at 26 centres across China, France, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years old or older with previously untreated locally advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, Child-Pugh class A disease, and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using permuted block randomisation to receive either tiragolumab 600 mg plus atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, administered via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Patients received treatment until unacceptable toxic effects or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Analysis of clinical activity was done in the efficacy-evaluable population (all patients who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen) and safety was assessed in all patients who received any study treatment. The trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04524871</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is ongoing.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Aug 20, 2020, and Feb 10, 2022, we assessed 154 patients for eligibility and 59 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=41) or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=18); one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group experienced an adverse event before receiving any treatment and withdrew from the study. Median age was 65·0 years (IQR 61·0–73·0). 46 (79%) of 58 patients were male and 12 (21%) were female. Most patients were Asian (23 [40%]) or White (21 [36%]). At the time of clinical cutoff (Aug 21, 2023), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 10·6–28·0) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 14·0 months (4·2–18·5) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. The confirmed objective response rate was 43% (95% CI 27–59, n=17) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 11% (1–35, n=2) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. All patients in both groups experienced an adverse event. The incidence of pruritis (20 [50%] of 40 patients <em>vs</em> three [17%] of 18 patients), arthralgia (13 [33%] <em>vs</em> two [11%]), and diarrhoea (12 [30%] <em>vs</em> one [6%]) was notably higher in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group than in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, although these were mainly grade 1–2. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (six [15%] of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group <em>vs</em> two [11%] of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group), aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [8%] of 40 patients <em>vs</em> one [6%] of 18 patients), and proteinuria (two [5%] of 40 patients <em>vs</em> two [11%] of 18 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 21 (53%) of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and in ten (56%) of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to cholestasis) and two patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to oesophageal varices haemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage). The addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not appear to result in a substantial worsening of treatment-related or immune-mediated adverse events, and no new safety signals were identified.<h3>Interpretation</h3>This signal-seeking study suggests that the addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab and bevacizumab might be more clinically active than atezolizumab plus bevacizumab alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on these data, further study of combination tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is warranted.<h3>Funding</h3>F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00679-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

PD-L1 and VEGF blockade with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been shown to improve survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. TIGIT is an immune checkpoint regulator implicated in many cancers, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we evaluate the clinical activity and safety of the addition of tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody, to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Methods

This randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2 umbrella study was conducted at 26 centres across China, France, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years old or older with previously untreated locally advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, Child-Pugh class A disease, and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using permuted block randomisation to receive either tiragolumab 600 mg plus atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, administered via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Patients received treatment until unacceptable toxic effects or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Analysis of clinical activity was done in the efficacy-evaluable population (all patients who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen) and safety was assessed in all patients who received any study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04524871, and is ongoing.

Findings

Between Aug 20, 2020, and Feb 10, 2022, we assessed 154 patients for eligibility and 59 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=41) or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=18); one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group experienced an adverse event before receiving any treatment and withdrew from the study. Median age was 65·0 years (IQR 61·0–73·0). 46 (79%) of 58 patients were male and 12 (21%) were female. Most patients were Asian (23 [40%]) or White (21 [36%]). At the time of clinical cutoff (Aug 21, 2023), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 10·6–28·0) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 14·0 months (4·2–18·5) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. The confirmed objective response rate was 43% (95% CI 27–59, n=17) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 11% (1–35, n=2) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. All patients in both groups experienced an adverse event. The incidence of pruritis (20 [50%] of 40 patients vs three [17%] of 18 patients), arthralgia (13 [33%] vs two [11%]), and diarrhoea (12 [30%] vs one [6%]) was notably higher in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group than in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, although these were mainly grade 1–2. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (six [15%] of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group vs two [11%] of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group), aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [8%] of 40 patients vs one [6%] of 18 patients), and proteinuria (two [5%] of 40 patients vs two [11%] of 18 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 21 (53%) of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and in ten (56%) of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to cholestasis) and two patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to oesophageal varices haemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage). The addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not appear to result in a substantial worsening of treatment-related or immune-mediated adverse events, and no new safety signals were identified.

Interpretation

This signal-seeking study suggests that the addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab and bevacizumab might be more clinically active than atezolizumab plus bevacizumab alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on these data, further study of combination tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is warranted.

Funding

F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Tiragolumab联合atezolizumab和bevacizumab治疗不可切除的局部晚期或转移性肝细胞癌(MORPHEUS-Liver):一项随机、开放标签、1b-2期研究
atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗阻断pd - l1和VEGF已被证明可改善不可切除的肝细胞癌的生存率。TIGIT是一种免疫检查点调节剂,涉及许多癌症,包括不可切除的肝细胞癌。在这里,我们评估了在atezolizumab + bevacizumab的基础上添加tiragolumab(一种抗tigit单克隆抗体)的临床活性和安全性。这项随机、开放标签、1b-2期伞式研究在中国、法国、以色列、新西兰、韩国、台湾和美国的26个中心进行。符合条件的患者为18岁或以上的成年人,既往未接受治疗的局部晚期不可切除肝细胞癌,东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为0-1,Child-Pugh A级疾病,预期寿命至少为3个月。符合条件的患者被随机分配(2:1),采用排列块随机分配,接受替拉单抗600 mg +阿特唑单抗1200 mg +贝伐单抗15 mg/kg或阿特唑单抗1200 mg +贝伐单抗15 mg/kg,每21天周期的第1天每3周静脉输注一次。患者接受治疗直至出现不可接受的毒副作用或丧失临床获益,以先发生者为准。主要终点为客观有效率。在可评估疗效的人群中(在指定的治疗方案中接受每种药物至少一剂的所有患者)进行临床活性分析,并对接受任何研究治疗的所有患者进行安全性评估。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT04524871,目前正在进行中。在2020年8月20日至2022年2月10日期间,我们评估了154例患者的资格,其中59例符合条件的患者被随机分配接受替拉单抗+ atezolizumab +贝伐单抗(n=41)或atezolizumab +贝伐单抗(n=18);在替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中,有一名患者在接受任何治疗前出现不良事件并退出研究。中位年龄66.5岁(IQR 61.0 ~ 73.0)。58例患者中男性46例(79%),女性12例(21%)。大多数患者为亚洲人(23例[40%])或白人(21例[36%])。截至临床截止日期(2023年8月21日),替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组的中位随访时间为20.6个月(IQR 10.6 - 28.0),阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组的中位随访时间为14.0个月(IQR 4.2 - 18.5)。在替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组,证实的客观缓解率为43% (95% CI 27-59, n=17),在阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组,证实的客观缓解率为11% (1-35,n=2)。两组患者均出现不良事件。搔痒(40例患者中20例[50%]vs 18例患者中3例[17%])、关节痛(13例[33%]vs 2例[11%])和腹泻(12例[30%]vs 1例[6%])的发生率在替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中明显高于阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组,尽管这些主要是1-2级。最常见的3-4级不良事件是高血压(替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组40例患者中有6例[15%],阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组18例患者中有2例[11%]),天冬氨酸转氨酶升高(40例患者中有3例[8%],18例患者中有1例[6%])和蛋白尿(40例患者中有2例[5%],18例患者中有2例[11%])。在替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中,40例患者中有21例(53%)发生严重不良事件,在阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中,18例患者中有10例(56%)发生严重不良事件。在替拉单抗+阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中,有1例患者发生治疗相关死亡(由于胆汁淤滞),阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组中有2例患者发生治疗相关死亡(由于食管静脉曲张出血和上消化道出血)。在阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗的基础上,替拉单抗的加入似乎没有导致治疗相关或免疫介导的不良事件的显著恶化,也没有发现新的安全性信号。这项信号寻求研究表明,在不可切除的肝细胞癌中,替拉单抗联合阿特唑单抗和贝伐单抗可能比阿特唑单抗联合贝伐单抗更具临床活性。基于这些数据,有必要进一步研究tiragolumab + atezolizumab + bevacizumab联合治疗。资助:霍夫曼-罗氏和基因泰克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信