Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Miguel Márquez-Gómez, Marta Díaz-Navarro, Andrés Visedo, Lourdes Prats-Peinado, Patricia Muñoz, Javier Vaquero, María Guembe, Pablo Sanz-Ruíz
{"title":"Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study.","authors":"Miguel Márquez-Gómez, Marta Díaz-Navarro, Andrés Visedo, Lourdes Prats-Peinado, Patricia Muñoz, Javier Vaquero, María Guembe, Pablo Sanz-Ruíz","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. In an in vitro study, our group recently demonstrated that sequential combination debridement (SCD) with 3% acetic acid (AA) followed by 10% povidone iodine (PI) and 5 mM hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) was the best strategy for reducing bacterial load. The present study aimed to validate these findings in an in vivo model. <b>Results</b>: The median (IQR) log CFU/mL was lower in the group of mice treated with SCD (2.85 [0.00-3.72]) than in the Bactisure™ group (4.02 [3.41-4.72], <i>p</i> = 0.02). While this reduction was also greater than in the PI group (3.99 [1.11-4.33]), the difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.19). Cell viability assays showed no differences between treatments. <i>S. aureus</i> bacteremia was detected in 10% of mice treated with SCD, compared to 30% in the PI group and 10% in the Bactisure™ group. The difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.36). <b>Conclusion</b>: Our findings confirm that SCD significantly reduced bacterial load in an in vivo S. aureus PJI model, showing superior anti-biofilm activity compared to Bactisure™ and comparable performance to PI alone. These results highlight SCD's potential to serve as a standardized chemical debridement protocol, combining enhanced efficacy with clinical applicability. <b>Methods</b>: We tested SCD with 3% AA for 3 min, 10% PI for 3 min, and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 3 min in a 7-day <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (ATCC29213)-based murine femur PJI model and compared the results with single treatments of 10% PI for 3 min or Bactisure™ solution for 3 min. A sterile steel implant with local administration of saline solution for 3 min was used as a non-infected control. After completing irrigation procedures, under anesthesia, mice were euthanized, and implants were analyzed for CFU/mL counts and cell viability rates. Blood cultures were obtained pre-euthanasia to detect bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. In an in vitro study, our group recently demonstrated that sequential combination debridement (SCD) with 3% acetic acid (AA) followed by 10% povidone iodine (PI) and 5 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was the best strategy for reducing bacterial load. The present study aimed to validate these findings in an in vivo model. Results: The median (IQR) log CFU/mL was lower in the group of mice treated with SCD (2.85 [0.00-3.72]) than in the Bactisure™ group (4.02 [3.41-4.72], p = 0.02). While this reduction was also greater than in the PI group (3.99 [1.11-4.33]), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). Cell viability assays showed no differences between treatments. S. aureus bacteremia was detected in 10% of mice treated with SCD, compared to 30% in the PI group and 10% in the Bactisure™ group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.36). Conclusion: Our findings confirm that SCD significantly reduced bacterial load in an in vivo S. aureus PJI model, showing superior anti-biofilm activity compared to Bactisure™ and comparable performance to PI alone. These results highlight SCD's potential to serve as a standardized chemical debridement protocol, combining enhanced efficacy with clinical applicability. Methods: We tested SCD with 3% AA for 3 min, 10% PI for 3 min, and H2O2 for 3 min in a 7-day Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC29213)-based murine femur PJI model and compared the results with single treatments of 10% PI for 3 min or Bactisure™ solution for 3 min. A sterile steel implant with local administration of saline solution for 3 min was used as a non-infected control. After completing irrigation procedures, under anesthesia, mice were euthanized, and implants were analyzed for CFU/mL counts and cell viability rates. Blood cultures were obtained pre-euthanasia to detect bacteremia.

在假体周围关节感染的化学清创中,特定顺序的抗菌溶液组合比单独使用抗菌溶液能改善预后吗?一项体内研究
背景:化学清创是急性和慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)手术治疗的基本步骤。然而,对于最优解决方案并没有达成共识,对于最优灌溉时间和方案组合也没有足够的证据。在一项体外研究中,我们的研究小组最近证明,用3%醋酸(AA),然后用10%聚维酮碘(PI)和5毫米过氧化氢(H2O2)进行顺序联合清创(SCD)是减少细菌负荷的最佳策略。本研究旨在在体内模型中验证这些发现。结果:SCD组小鼠的中位(IQR) log CFU/mL(2.85[0.00-3.72])低于Bactisure™组(4.02 [3.41-4.72],p = 0.02)。这一降幅也高于PI组(3.99[1.11-4.33]),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.19)。细胞活力测定显示不同处理间无差异。在接受SCD治疗的小鼠中,10%检测到金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症,相比之下,PI组为30%,Bactisure™组为10%。差异无统计学意义(p = 0.36)。结论:我们的研究结果证实,SCD显著降低了体内金黄色葡萄球菌PJI模型的细菌负荷,与Bactisure™相比,SCD具有优越的抗生物膜活性,与单独使用PI相当。这些结果突出了SCD作为标准化化学清创方案的潜力,结合了增强的疗效和临床适用性。方法:我们在一个7天的基于金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC29213)的小鼠股骨PJI模型中,用3% AA、10% PI和H2O2分别对SCD进行3分钟、3分钟和3分钟的测试,并将结果与10% PI单独处理3分钟或Bactisure™溶液单独处理3分钟的结果进行比较。无菌钢植入物局部给予生理盐水3分钟作为非感染对照。在完成灌洗程序后,在麻醉下对小鼠实施安乐死,并分析植入物的CFU/mL计数和细胞存活率。在安乐死前进行血培养以检测菌血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信