Examining Discrimination as a Distal Moderator of the Proximal Association Between LGBQ+ College Students' Alcohol Use and Cyber Dating Abuse.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
L M Meier, K Westerhold, C Edwards, T J Shaw, M J Brem
{"title":"Examining Discrimination as a Distal Moderator of the Proximal Association Between LGBQ+ College Students' Alcohol Use and Cyber Dating Abuse.","authors":"L M Meier, K Westerhold, C Edwards, T J Shaw, M J Brem","doi":"10.1891/VV-2024-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive and inclusive dating abuse prevention is hindered by a lack of research on proximal antecedents of cyber dating abuse (CDA) among lesbian, gay, bi-/pansexual, queer, and other nonheterosexual (LGBQ+) young adults. Guided by sexual minority stress and alcohol-related violence theories, we addressed this gap by examining whether (a) alcohol use preceded and was positively related to CDA perpetration and (b) more frequent LGBQ+-based discrimination strengthened this association. LGBQ+ college students (<i>N</i> = 41; 75.6% women, 22% men, and 2.4% transgender/nonbinary) completed baseline assessments of past-year LGBQ+-specific discrimination (hostility, heterosexist harassment, and incivility) followed by daily assessments of alcohol use and CDA for 60 days. Multilevel modeling revealed that participants were less likely to perpetrate CDA on days when they consumed more alcohol than usual (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = .49, <i>p</i> < .001). Individuals who experienced more frequent hostility (aOR = .63, <i>p</i> < .001) and incivility (aOR = .88, <i>p</i> = .003) were less likely to perpetrate CDA. No other main effects or alcohol × discrimination interactions emerged. Alcohol may not be a proximal antecedent of LGBQ+ college students' CDA. Daily assessments of discrimination and couple-level coping may help clarify the role of LGBQ+-specific discrimination in CDA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48139,"journal":{"name":"Violence and Victims","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence and Victims","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/VV-2024-0019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive and inclusive dating abuse prevention is hindered by a lack of research on proximal antecedents of cyber dating abuse (CDA) among lesbian, gay, bi-/pansexual, queer, and other nonheterosexual (LGBQ+) young adults. Guided by sexual minority stress and alcohol-related violence theories, we addressed this gap by examining whether (a) alcohol use preceded and was positively related to CDA perpetration and (b) more frequent LGBQ+-based discrimination strengthened this association. LGBQ+ college students (N = 41; 75.6% women, 22% men, and 2.4% transgender/nonbinary) completed baseline assessments of past-year LGBQ+-specific discrimination (hostility, heterosexist harassment, and incivility) followed by daily assessments of alcohol use and CDA for 60 days. Multilevel modeling revealed that participants were less likely to perpetrate CDA on days when they consumed more alcohol than usual (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = .49, p < .001). Individuals who experienced more frequent hostility (aOR = .63, p < .001) and incivility (aOR = .88, p = .003) were less likely to perpetrate CDA. No other main effects or alcohol × discrimination interactions emerged. Alcohol may not be a proximal antecedent of LGBQ+ college students' CDA. Daily assessments of discrimination and couple-level coping may help clarify the role of LGBQ+-specific discrimination in CDA.

性别歧视在LGBQ+大学生酒精使用与网络约会虐待近端关系中的调节作用
由于缺乏对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋/泛双性恋、同性恋和其他非异性恋(LGBQ+)年轻成年人中网络约会虐待(CDA)近因的研究,全面、包容的约会虐待预防工作受到了阻碍。在性少数群体压力和与酒精相关的暴力理论指导下,我们通过研究 (a) 酒精使用是否先于 CDA 实施并与之呈正相关,以及 (b) 更频繁的基于 LGBQ+ 的歧视是否会加强这种关联,来填补这一空白。LGBQ+ 大学生(N = 41;75.6% 为女性,22% 为男性,2.4% 为变性人/非二元性)完成了对过去一年 LGBQ+ 特定歧视(敌意、异性恋骚扰和不礼貌行为)的基线评估,随后在 60 天内完成了对酒精使用和 CDA 的每日评估。多层次模型显示,参与者在比平时饮酒更多的日子里,实施 CDA 的可能性更低(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 0.49,p < 0.001)。经常遭受敌意(aOR = .63,p < .001)和不礼貌(aOR = .88,p = .003)的人更不可能实施 CDA。没有出现其他主效应或酒精 × 歧视的交互作用。酒精可能不是 LGBQ+ 大学生 CDA 的近端前因。对歧视和情侣层面应对措施的日常评估可能有助于澄清LGBQ+特定歧视在CDA中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Violence and Victims
Violence and Victims CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: We all face the difficult problem of understanding and treating the perpetrators and victims of violence behavior. Violence and Victims is the evidence-based resource that informs clinical decisions, legal actions, and public policy. Now celebrating its 25th year, Violence and Victims is a peer-reviewed journal of theory, research, policy, and clinical practice in the area of interpersonal violence and victimization. It seeks to facilitate the exchange of information on this subject across such professional disciplines as psychology, sociology, criminology, law, medicine, nursing, psychiatry, and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信