Evaluating the differential benefits of varying carbohydrate-restricted diets on lipid profiles and cardiovascular risks in dyslipidemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Food & Function Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1039/d4fo05125d
Kang Liu, Hui He, Min Liu, Yu-Qi Hu, Louise Weiwei Lu, Bin Liu, Jie-Hua Chen
{"title":"Evaluating the differential benefits of varying carbohydrate-restricted diets on lipid profiles and cardiovascular risks in dyslipidemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Kang Liu, Hui He, Min Liu, Yu-Qi Hu, Louise Weiwei Lu, Bin Liu, Jie-Hua Chen","doi":"10.1039/d4fo05125d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: carbohydrate-restricted diets (CRDs) have gained attention to address metabolic dysregulation commonly observed in dyslipidemia, a condition posing significant risks to cardiovascular health. However, the effectiveness of CRDs in improving cardiovascular health remains contentious. This meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the long-term effects of CRDs on glucolipid metabolism and weight loss in individuals with dyslipidemia. <i>Methods</i>: extensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of CRDs on glucolipid metabolism and weight loss in adults with dyslipidemia over a minimum of three weeks were included. This analysis compared the differential effects between moderate-low carbohydrate diets (MLCDs) and low carbohydrate diets (LCDs), including a targeted evaluation of animal-based CRDs and dyslipidemic individuals based on the BMI status, thereby addressing gaps in current knowledge. <i>Results</i>: Our findings indicated that CRDs significantly enhanced lipid profiles, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and contributed to weight management in individuals with dyslipidemia. MLCDs were more effective than LCDs in improving all lipid profiles except for TG, which was more effectively managed by LCDs. Animal-based CRDs did not significantly impact lipid profiles. Dyslipidemic individuals with overweight and obesity showed significant changes in TG and ApoB. A noteworthy negative correlation was also observed between TC, TG, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with higher dietary fiber intake, supporting the beneficial impact of fiber on cardiovascular health. <i>Conclusions</i>: These results for the first time highlighted the potential of adopting MLCDs, particularly those with sufficient fiber content, as a powerful strategy for reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients suffering from dyslipidemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fo05125d","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: carbohydrate-restricted diets (CRDs) have gained attention to address metabolic dysregulation commonly observed in dyslipidemia, a condition posing significant risks to cardiovascular health. However, the effectiveness of CRDs in improving cardiovascular health remains contentious. This meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the long-term effects of CRDs on glucolipid metabolism and weight loss in individuals with dyslipidemia. Methods: extensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of CRDs on glucolipid metabolism and weight loss in adults with dyslipidemia over a minimum of three weeks were included. This analysis compared the differential effects between moderate-low carbohydrate diets (MLCDs) and low carbohydrate diets (LCDs), including a targeted evaluation of animal-based CRDs and dyslipidemic individuals based on the BMI status, thereby addressing gaps in current knowledge. Results: Our findings indicated that CRDs significantly enhanced lipid profiles, including total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and contributed to weight management in individuals with dyslipidemia. MLCDs were more effective than LCDs in improving all lipid profiles except for TG, which was more effectively managed by LCDs. Animal-based CRDs did not significantly impact lipid profiles. Dyslipidemic individuals with overweight and obesity showed significant changes in TG and ApoB. A noteworthy negative correlation was also observed between TC, TG, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with higher dietary fiber intake, supporting the beneficial impact of fiber on cardiovascular health. Conclusions: These results for the first time highlighted the potential of adopting MLCDs, particularly those with sufficient fiber content, as a powerful strategy for reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients suffering from dyslipidemia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信