How can consumer science help the foodservice industry replace meat? A critical review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Iuri Baptista, Emma Garnett, Åsa Öström
{"title":"How can consumer science help the foodservice industry replace meat? A critical review.","authors":"Iuri Baptista, Emma Garnett, Åsa Öström","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.107861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the pursuit of more sustainable diets, researchers have been studying ways to promote a transition from animal-based to plant-based meals in foodservice contexts by influencing participants' conscious choices through names, labels, claims, and information. This critical review found that these interventions usually mobilize only those already engaged in reducing the consumption of animal products and often only during the intervention period, failing to influence those who eat most meat or to create long-lasting effects. Analyzing the choice for vegetarian meals against meals with meat in recently published studies conducted in foodservice contexts, we argue that the transition to more sustainable diets should rely less on consumers' willpower and more on public policies and institutional measures that change the availability, price, and visibility of plant-based meals. Inspired by behavioral sciences, this paper discusses interventions that challenge meals with meat as the default option and suggests hybrids as a path to increase the availability, convenience, and sensory familiarity of vegetarian meals. The paper ends with proposals for questions, interventions, metrics, and issues to be researched by consumer science, including questions on the degree of freedom of consumers' choice and what would be the ethical limits to telling half the truth about hybrids.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.107861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the pursuit of more sustainable diets, researchers have been studying ways to promote a transition from animal-based to plant-based meals in foodservice contexts by influencing participants' conscious choices through names, labels, claims, and information. This critical review found that these interventions usually mobilize only those already engaged in reducing the consumption of animal products and often only during the intervention period, failing to influence those who eat most meat or to create long-lasting effects. Analyzing the choice for vegetarian meals against meals with meat in recently published studies conducted in foodservice contexts, we argue that the transition to more sustainable diets should rely less on consumers' willpower and more on public policies and institutional measures that change the availability, price, and visibility of plant-based meals. Inspired by behavioral sciences, this paper discusses interventions that challenge meals with meat as the default option and suggests hybrids as a path to increase the availability, convenience, and sensory familiarity of vegetarian meals. The paper ends with proposals for questions, interventions, metrics, and issues to be researched by consumer science, including questions on the degree of freedom of consumers' choice and what would be the ethical limits to telling half the truth about hybrids.

消费者科学如何帮助食品服务行业取代肉类?批判性的评论。
为了追求更可持续的饮食,研究人员一直在研究如何通过名称、标签、声明和信息影响参与者的有意识选择,从而促进餐饮服务环境中从动物性饮食向植物性饮食的转变。这项批判性审查发现,这些干预措施通常只动员那些已经参与减少动物产品消费的人,而且往往只在干预期间进行,未能影响那些吃肉最多的人,也无法产生长期影响。在最近发表的餐饮服务研究中,我们分析了素食餐与肉类餐的选择,我们认为,向更可持续饮食的过渡应该更少地依赖于消费者的意志力,而更多地依赖于公共政策和制度措施,以改变植物性膳食的可获得性、价格和可见性。受行为科学的启发,本文讨论了以肉类为默认选择的干预措施,并建议将杂交作为增加素食膳食可用性,便利性和感官熟悉度的途径。论文最后提出了消费者科学需要研究的问题、干预措施、指标和问题,包括消费者选择的自由程度,以及对混合动力车只说一半真话的道德限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信