Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hong-Ching Kwok, Hei-Tak Tse, Ka-Ki Ng, Shuangshuang Wang, Chun-Kit Au, Zongwei Cai, Wan Chan
{"title":"Absorptivity Is an Important Determinant in the Toxicity Difference between Aristolochic Acid I and Aristolochic Acid II","authors":"Hong-Ching Kwok, Hei-Tak Tse, Ka-Ki Ng, Shuangshuang Wang, Chun-Kit Au, Zongwei Cai, Wan Chan","doi":"10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.","PeriodicalId":41,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","volume":"74 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c10765","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inadvertent exposure to aristolochic acids (AAs) is causing chronic renal disease worldwide, with aristolochic acid I (AA-I) identified as the primary toxic agent. This study employed chemical methods to investigate the mechanisms underlying the nephrotoxicity and carcinogenicity of AA-I. Aristolochic acid II (AA-II), which has a structure similar to that of AA-I, was investigated with the same methods for comparison. Despite their structural similarities, findings from cultured human cells and gut sac experiments showed that AA-I is absorbed more effectively than AA-II (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001). This increased absorption, along with the previously observed higher activity of reductive activation enzymes for AA-I, results in greater DNA damage and oxidative stress, both of which are key factors in AA-related toxicity. The similar patterns of cell mortality (34.4 ± 2.3% vs 9.7 ± 0.1% for AA-I and AA-II at 80 μM; p < 0.0001), DNA adduct formation (∼3 times greater for AA-I than for AA-II; p < 0.001), and oxidative stress levels in relation to the concentrations of AA-I and AA-II indicate that the higher absorption rate of AA-I is a significant contributor to its greater toxicity. The toxicity of AA-I was also found to be further enhanced by its (natural) coexistence with AA-II. Since AA-I and AA-II differ only by a methoxy group, future research on reducing risks associated with AA exposure should focus on strategies to lower the absorption of these compounds.

Abstract Image

吸光度是决定马兜铃酸I和马兜铃酸II毒性差异的重要因素
无意中暴露于马兜铃酸(AAs)在世界范围内引起慢性肾脏疾病,马兜铃酸I (AA-I)被确定为主要毒性物质。本研究采用化学方法探讨了AA-I的肾毒性和致癌性机制。采用相同的方法对结构与AA-I相似的马兜铃酸II (AA-II)进行了比较研究。尽管它们的结构相似,但培养的人类细胞和肠囊实验的结果表明,AA-I比AA-II更有效地被吸收(AA-I比AA-II高~ 3倍;p & lt;0.001)。这种吸收的增加,加上之前观察到的AA-I还原活化酶活性的提高,导致更大的DNA损伤和氧化应激,这两者都是aa相关毒性的关键因素。AA-I和AA-II在80 μM下细胞死亡率相似(分别为34.4±2.3%和9.7±0.1%);p & lt;0.0001), DNA加合物的形成(AA-I比AA-II高~ 3倍;p & lt;0.001),氧化应激水平与AA-I和AA-II浓度的关系表明,较高的AA-I吸收率是其毒性更大的重要因素。AA-I与AA-II的(自然)共存进一步增强了其毒性。由于AA- i和AA- ii仅在甲氧基上有所不同,未来关于降低AA暴露相关风险的研究应侧重于降低这些化合物吸收的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
8.20%
发文量
1375
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry publishes high-quality, cutting edge original research representing complete studies and research advances dealing with the chemistry and biochemistry of agriculture and food. The Journal also encourages papers with chemistry and/or biochemistry as a major component combined with biological/sensory/nutritional/toxicological evaluation related to agriculture and/or food.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信