Effectiveness of Cooking Procedures in Reducing Antibiotic Residues in Bivalves.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hugo Bastos, André M P T Pereira, Angelina Pena, Andreia Freitas, Marta Leite, Liliana J G Silva
{"title":"Effectiveness of Cooking Procedures in Reducing Antibiotic Residues in Bivalves.","authors":"Hugo Bastos, André M P T Pereira, Angelina Pena, Andreia Freitas, Marta Leite, Liliana J G Silva","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> The widespread use of antibiotics, which wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) cannot fully remove, in human and veterinary medicine leads to their release into wastewater, resulting in the contamination of aquatic environments. Bivalves can accumulate these antibiotics, posing a risk to shellfish consumers, including potential antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to assess how three cooking methods-marinating, steaming, and grilling-affect the concentration of 33 different antibiotics in bivalves fortified at the level of maximum residue limit (MRL) and twice the MRL (2MRL). <b>Results:</b> The data show the percentage of antibiotic remaining after cooking: 100% indicates stability or no reduction; values above 100% show an increase in concentration, and values below 100% reflect a decrease in antibiotic concentration. In general, all culinary procedures removed part of the added antibiotics. However, the most effective method was marinating (47%), followed by steaming (60%) and finally grilling (92%). It was also found that, overall, the fortification level, MRL or 2MRL, did not impact antibiotic removal in each cooking method. Moreover, different antibiotics' classes presented diverse removals when cooked, ranging between 0% for penicillins and 73% for sulphonamides. Furthermore, the results showed a great diversity of responses to cooking within some antibiotic classes. <b>Methods:</b> After cooking, the analysis was based on solid-liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ToF-MS). <b>Conclusions:</b> The ongoing monitoring of antibiotic levels is essential, and further research is needed to understand how cooking affects these substances and their metabolites. This will help assess the real risk to consumers and guide risk-mitigation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The widespread use of antibiotics, which wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) cannot fully remove, in human and veterinary medicine leads to their release into wastewater, resulting in the contamination of aquatic environments. Bivalves can accumulate these antibiotics, posing a risk to shellfish consumers, including potential antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to assess how three cooking methods-marinating, steaming, and grilling-affect the concentration of 33 different antibiotics in bivalves fortified at the level of maximum residue limit (MRL) and twice the MRL (2MRL). Results: The data show the percentage of antibiotic remaining after cooking: 100% indicates stability or no reduction; values above 100% show an increase in concentration, and values below 100% reflect a decrease in antibiotic concentration. In general, all culinary procedures removed part of the added antibiotics. However, the most effective method was marinating (47%), followed by steaming (60%) and finally grilling (92%). It was also found that, overall, the fortification level, MRL or 2MRL, did not impact antibiotic removal in each cooking method. Moreover, different antibiotics' classes presented diverse removals when cooked, ranging between 0% for penicillins and 73% for sulphonamides. Furthermore, the results showed a great diversity of responses to cooking within some antibiotic classes. Methods: After cooking, the analysis was based on solid-liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ToF-MS). Conclusions: The ongoing monitoring of antibiotic levels is essential, and further research is needed to understand how cooking affects these substances and their metabolites. This will help assess the real risk to consumers and guide risk-mitigation measures.

烹调方法减少双壳类动物抗生素残留的有效性。
背景/目的:抗生素在人类和兽药中的广泛使用,污水处理厂(WWTPs)无法完全去除抗生素,导致抗生素释放到废水中,导致水生环境污染。双壳类可以积累这些抗生素,对贝类消费者构成风险,包括潜在的抗菌素耐药性。本研究旨在评估腌制、蒸煮和烧烤三种烹饪方法对最大残留限量(MRL)和最大残留限量两倍(2MRL)强化双壳贝中33种不同抗生素浓度的影响。结果:数据显示,煮熟后抗生素残留百分比:100%表示稳定或没有减少;高于100%的值表示浓度增加,低于100%的值表示抗生素浓度下降。总的来说,所有的烹饪过程都去除了部分添加的抗生素。然而,最有效的方法是腌制(47%),其次是蒸(60%),最后是烧烤(92%)。还发现,总体而言,强化水平,MRL或2MRL,在每种烹饪方法中都不会影响抗生素的去除。此外,不同种类的抗生素在煮熟时表现出不同的去除率,青霉素的去除率为0%,磺胺类抗生素的去除率为73%。此外,结果显示,在某些抗生素类别中,对烹饪的反应存在很大差异。方法:蒸煮后,采用固液萃取-液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱(UHPLC-ToF-MS)分析。结论:持续监测抗生素水平至关重要,需要进一步研究以了解烹饪如何影响这些物质及其代谢物。这将有助于评估消费者面临的实际风险,并指导降低风险的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信