Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation.

IF 0.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Benjamin C Graham, Stephanie Burkhalter
{"title":"Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation.","authors":"Benjamin C Graham, Stephanie Burkhalter","doi":"10.1080/10852352.2024.2441601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Democratic innovations offer a promising set of interventions to empower citizens, reduce polarization, and reimagine participatory governance. This article examines the Petaluma Fairgrounds Advisory Panel (PFAP), a citizens assembly convened to deliberate the future of a locally significant property. This qualitative study consisted of 15 panelist interviews exploring panelist experiences of nine equity strategies incorporated into the PFAP design as well as broader themes around how equity was conceptualized. Certain equity strategies emerged as particularly salient in shaping panelists' experiences, underscoring the significance of specific design components in fostering equity. In most cases appraisals were positive, though several critiques and negative assessments were mentioned. Panelist conceptualizations of equity centered around notions of fairness and belonging. The current study offers a window into how strategies to promote equity are experienced, and can inform participatory and deliberative practices that seek to effectively incorporate values of equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2024.2441601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Democratic innovations offer a promising set of interventions to empower citizens, reduce polarization, and reimagine participatory governance. This article examines the Petaluma Fairgrounds Advisory Panel (PFAP), a citizens assembly convened to deliberate the future of a locally significant property. This qualitative study consisted of 15 panelist interviews exploring panelist experiences of nine equity strategies incorporated into the PFAP design as well as broader themes around how equity was conceptualized. Certain equity strategies emerged as particularly salient in shaping panelists' experiences, underscoring the significance of specific design components in fostering equity. In most cases appraisals were positive, though several critiques and negative assessments were mentioned. Panelist conceptualizations of equity centered around notions of fairness and belonging. The current study offers a window into how strategies to promote equity are experienced, and can inform participatory and deliberative practices that seek to effectively incorporate values of equity.

行动中的公平与包容原则:以民主审议为例。
民主创新提供了一套有希望的干预措施,可以赋予公民权力,减少两极分化,并重新构想参与式治理。本文考察了Petaluma Fairgrounds咨询小组(PFAP),这是一个公民大会,旨在审议当地重要财产的未来。这项定性研究包括15个小组成员访谈,探讨了纳入PFAP设计的9种公平策略的小组成员经验,以及围绕公平如何概念化的更广泛主题。某些公平策略在塑造小组成员的经验方面尤为突出,强调了特定设计组件在促进公平方面的重要性。在大多数情况下,评价是正面的,虽然也提到了一些批评和负面评价。小组成员对公平的概念围绕着公平和归属的概念。目前的研究提供了一个窗口,了解促进公平的战略是如何经历的,并可以为寻求有效地纳入公平价值的参与性和审议性实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Communityis on the cutting edge of social action and change, not only covering current thought and developments, but also defining future directions in the field. Under the editorship of Joseph R. Ferrari since 1995, Prevention in Human Services was retitled as the Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Communityto reflect its focus of providing professionals with information on the leading, effective programs for community intervention and prevention of problems. Because of its intensive coverage of selected topics and the sheer length of each issue, the Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community is the first-and in many cases, primary-source of information for mental health and human services development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信