A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness in Hospitalized Older Adults.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae085
Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Megan K Mueller
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness in Hospitalized Older Adults.","authors":"Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Megan K Mueller","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients (<i>N</i> = 42) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 conditions: dog and handler interaction (animal-assisted interaction [AAI]), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 min per day over 3 days. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) and Short Form (UCLA-SF) as well as an analog rating scale were used to assess loneliness. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were applied to examine differences in the changes from before to after the conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in the UCLA-SF [<i>t</i> (200.356) = 1.851, <i>p</i> = .033] and the analog loneliness scale [<i>t</i> (194.407) = 2.651, <i>p</i> = .004], differed significantly between the AAI condition and the UC conditions but not between the CC and UC conditions (<i>p</i> = .175). Trajectories of changes in loneliness showed more improvement in the AAI than in the UC condition.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05089201.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 11","pages":"igae085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11714157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness.

Research design and methods: Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients (N = 42) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 conditions: dog and handler interaction (animal-assisted interaction [AAI]), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 min per day over 3 days. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) and Short Form (UCLA-SF) as well as an analog rating scale were used to assess loneliness. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were applied to examine differences in the changes from before to after the conditions.

Results: Changes in the UCLA-SF [t (200.356) = 1.851, p = .033] and the analog loneliness scale [t (194.407) = 2.651, p = .004], differed significantly between the AAI condition and the UC conditions but not between the CC and UC conditions (p = .175). Trajectories of changes in loneliness showed more improvement in the AAI than in the UC condition.

Discussion and implications: These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05089201.

一项研究治疗犬干预对住院老年人孤独感影响的随机对照试验。
背景和目的:孤独与严重的健康威胁有关,可能比肥胖更危险;它影响了多达29%的非机构老年人。对于那些需要住院康复、远离社交网络、很少花时间接受治疗、缺乏运动和社会孤立的人来说,孤独感会加剧。新出现的证据表明,伴侣动物提供了许多健康和幸福的好处,与训练有素的治疗犬互动可能会减少孤独感。研究设计和方法:老年人(59岁以上)住院患者(N = 42)随机分配接受3种条件中的1种:狗和训导员互动(动物辅助互动[AAI]),训导员对话控制(CC)或常规护理(UC),每天20分钟,持续3天。采用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(UCLA- ls)和简短表格(UCLA- sf)以及模拟评定量表来评估孤独感。采用随机截距的线性混合模型来考察条件前后变化的差异。结果:UCLA-SF的变化[t (200.356) = 1.851, p =。[033]和模拟孤独量表[t (194.407) = 2.651, p =。[004],在AAI条件和UC条件之间差异显著,但在CC和UC条件之间没有差异(p = .175)。孤独感的变化轨迹显示,AAI患者比UC患者改善更多。讨论与启示:这些结果表明AAI对于减少住院老年人的孤独感是有效的。只有人类训练员的访问没有产生类似的发现,这表明狗的存在有一些独特和有益的东西。临床试验注册:NCT05089201。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信