Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Megan K Mueller
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness in Hospitalized Older Adults.","authors":"Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Megan K Mueller","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients (<i>N</i> = 42) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 conditions: dog and handler interaction (animal-assisted interaction [AAI]), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 min per day over 3 days. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) and Short Form (UCLA-SF) as well as an analog rating scale were used to assess loneliness. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were applied to examine differences in the changes from before to after the conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in the UCLA-SF [<i>t</i> (200.356) = 1.851, <i>p</i> = .033] and the analog loneliness scale [<i>t</i> (194.407) = 2.651, <i>p</i> = .004], differed significantly between the AAI condition and the UC conditions but not between the CC and UC conditions (<i>p</i> = .175). Trajectories of changes in loneliness showed more improvement in the AAI than in the UC condition.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05089201.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 11","pages":"igae085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11714157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness.
Research design and methods: Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients (N = 42) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 conditions: dog and handler interaction (animal-assisted interaction [AAI]), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 min per day over 3 days. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) and Short Form (UCLA-SF) as well as an analog rating scale were used to assess loneliness. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were applied to examine differences in the changes from before to after the conditions.
Results: Changes in the UCLA-SF [t (200.356) = 1.851, p = .033] and the analog loneliness scale [t (194.407) = 2.651, p = .004], differed significantly between the AAI condition and the UC conditions but not between the CC and UC conditions (p = .175). Trajectories of changes in loneliness showed more improvement in the AAI than in the UC condition.
Discussion and implications: These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.