Symptomatic networks in suicide attempt and reattempt: Relevance of psychiatric comorbidity.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Andres Pemau, Alejandro de la Torre-Luque, Carolina Marin-Martin, Marina Diaz-Marsa, Jorge Andreo-Jover, Wala Ayad-Ahmed, Maria Fe Bravo Ortiz, Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Irene Canosa García, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, María Ángeles Boti, Matilde Elices, Ana González-Pinto, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, Diego J Palao, Angela Palao-Tarrero, Carla Pérez-Guerra, Natalia Roberto, Miguel Ruiz Veguilla, Pilar A Sáiz, Víctor Pérez
{"title":"Symptomatic networks in suicide attempt and reattempt: Relevance of psychiatric comorbidity.","authors":"Andres Pemau, Alejandro de la Torre-Luque, Carolina Marin-Martin, Marina Diaz-Marsa, Jorge Andreo-Jover, Wala Ayad-Ahmed, Maria Fe Bravo Ortiz, Maria Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Manuel Canal-Rivero, Irene Canosa García, Ana Isabel Cebrià, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, María Ángeles Boti, Matilde Elices, Ana González-Pinto, Iria Grande, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, Diego J Palao, Angela Palao-Tarrero, Carla Pérez-Guerra, Natalia Roberto, Miguel Ruiz Veguilla, Pilar A Sáiz, Víctor Pérez","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort \"SURVIVE\" were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"68 1","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most relevant risk factors for suicide is the presence of previous attempts. The symptomatic profile of people who reattempt suicide deserves attention. Network analysis is a promising tool to study this field.

Objective: To analyze the symptomatic network of patients who have attempted suicide recently and compare networks of people with several attempts and people with just one at baseline.

Methods: 1043 adult participants from the Spanish cohort "SURVIVE" were part of this study. Participants were classified into two groups: single attempt group (n = 390) and reattempt group (n = 653). Different network analyses were carried out to study the relationships between suicidal ideation, behavior, psychiatric symptoms, diagnoses, childhood trauma, and impulsivity. A general network and one for each subgroup were estimated.

Results: People with several suicide attempts at baseline scored significantly higher across all clinical scales. The symptomatic networks were equivalent in both groups of patients (p > .05). Although there were no overall differences between the networks, some nodes were more relevant according to group belonging.

Conclusions: People with a history of previous attempts have greater psychiatric symptom severity but the relationships between risk factors show the same structure when compared with the single attempt group. All risk factors deserve attention regardless of the number of attempts, but assessments can be adjusted to better monitor the occurrence of reattempts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Psychiatry
European Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
2338
审稿时长
4.5 weeks
期刊介绍: European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信