Neuroplasticity in Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas: Backward Modelling of Brain-tumor Interactions Prior to Diagnosis is Needed to Better Predict Recovery after Treatment.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hugues Duffau
{"title":"Neuroplasticity in Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas: Backward Modelling of Brain-tumor Interactions Prior to Diagnosis is Needed to Better Predict Recovery after Treatment.","authors":"Hugues Duffau","doi":"10.1007/s11910-024-01402-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In low-grade glioma (LGG), besides the patient's neurological status and tumor characteristics on neuroimaging, current treatment guidelines mainly rely on the glioma's genetics at diagnosis to define therapeutic strategy, usually starting with surgical resection. However, this snapshot in time does not take into account the antecedent period of tumor progression and its interactions with the brain before presentation. This article reviews new concepts that pertain to reconstruct the history of previous interplay between the LGG's course and adaptive changes in the connectome within which the glioma is embedded over the years preceding the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Microscale and macroscale parameters helpful for extrapolating backward in time are considered, both for the glioma (kinetics, migration vs. proliferation profile, metabolism with possible intratumoral heterogeneity, relationships with surrounding cerebral pathways) and for patterns of reconfiguration within and across neural networks in reaction to the LGG leading to considerable interindividual cerebral variability. Modelling these continuous variations at the time of LGG diagnosis is a prerequisite to predict recovery from treatment(s). It is important to go beyond the biology of the LGG at a given moment of its history, and instead construct a more comprehensive picture of the past and present dynamics of glioma-brain interactions, and their ongoing evolution, as a necessary stage to optimize a personalized management plan by thinking several steps ahead.</p>","PeriodicalId":10831,"journal":{"name":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","volume":"25 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024-01402-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: In low-grade glioma (LGG), besides the patient's neurological status and tumor characteristics on neuroimaging, current treatment guidelines mainly rely on the glioma's genetics at diagnosis to define therapeutic strategy, usually starting with surgical resection. However, this snapshot in time does not take into account the antecedent period of tumor progression and its interactions with the brain before presentation. This article reviews new concepts that pertain to reconstruct the history of previous interplay between the LGG's course and adaptive changes in the connectome within which the glioma is embedded over the years preceding the diagnosis.

Recent findings: Microscale and macroscale parameters helpful for extrapolating backward in time are considered, both for the glioma (kinetics, migration vs. proliferation profile, metabolism with possible intratumoral heterogeneity, relationships with surrounding cerebral pathways) and for patterns of reconfiguration within and across neural networks in reaction to the LGG leading to considerable interindividual cerebral variability. Modelling these continuous variations at the time of LGG diagnosis is a prerequisite to predict recovery from treatment(s). It is important to go beyond the biology of the LGG at a given moment of its history, and instead construct a more comprehensive picture of the past and present dynamics of glioma-brain interactions, and their ongoing evolution, as a necessary stage to optimize a personalized management plan by thinking several steps ahead.

弥漫性低级别胶质瘤的神经可塑性:诊断前脑肿瘤相互作用的反向建模需要更好地预测治疗后的恢复。
综述目的:在低级别胶质瘤(LGG)中,除了患者的神经系统状态和肿瘤在神经影像学上的特征外,目前的治疗指南主要依靠胶质瘤在诊断时的遗传学来确定治疗策略,通常从手术切除开始。然而,这种时间快照并没有考虑到肿瘤进展的前期以及它在出现之前与大脑的相互作用。这篇文章回顾了一些新的概念,这些概念涉及到重建在诊断前几年胶质瘤所嵌入的连接组中LGG的过程和适应性变化之间先前相互作用的历史。最近的发现:对于胶质瘤(动力学、迁移与增殖剖面、可能的肿瘤内异质性代谢、与周围大脑通路的关系)和神经网络内部和跨神经网络的重构模式,以及对LGG的反应,都考虑了有助于向后时间推断的微观尺度和宏观尺度参数,从而导致相当大的个体间大脑变异性。在LGG诊断时对这些连续变化进行建模是预测治疗后恢复的先决条件。重要的是要超越其历史上特定时刻的LGG生物学,而是构建一个更全面的胶质瘤-大脑相互作用的过去和现在的动态图景,以及它们正在进行的进化,作为优化个性化管理计划的必要阶段,提前考虑几个步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of neurological disease and disorders. Presents the views of experts on current advances in neurology and neuroscience Gathers and synthesizes important recent papers on the topic Includes reviews of recently published clinical trials, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信