Signal Processing Workflow for Suspect Screening in LC × LC-HRMS: Efficient Extraction of Pure Mass Spectra for Identification of Suspects in Complex Samples Using a Mass Filtering Algorithm

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Paul-Albert Schneide, Oskar Munk Kronik
{"title":"Signal Processing Workflow for Suspect Screening in LC × LC-HRMS: Efficient Extraction of Pure Mass Spectra for Identification of Suspects in Complex Samples Using a Mass Filtering Algorithm","authors":"Paul-Albert Schneide, Oskar Munk Kronik","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The data processing workflows for comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC × LC) hyphenated to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) operated in data-independent acquisition (DIA) are limited compared to their one-dimensional counterparts. A two-step workflow is proposed to extract pure mass spectra from LC × LC-HRMS. First, a mass filtering (MF) algorithm groups ions belonging to the same compound based on their elution profile similarity in the first (<sup>1</sup>D) and second dimension (<sup>2</sup>D). Second, the filtered data are deconvoluted using multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to address potential coelution. The presented workflow is termed MF + MCR and was tested on pulsed elution-LC × LC-HRMS data from a wastewater effluent extract. The proposed workflow was benchmarked to the following three data processing strategies for mass spectra extraction: peak apex (PAM), using the MF approach alone, or using MCR without prior MF. The MF + MCR workflow identified 25 suspect compounds, compared to 23, 16, and 10 identified by MF, MCR, and PAM, respectively. The nine suspects that could not be identified using MCR compared to the MF + MCR all had low total signal contributions, i.e., low intensities compared to the TIC. This showed that adequate preprocessing prior to MCR is essential for trace level analysis. Additionally, it was shown that the MF + MCR workflow extracted statistically significantly purer mass spectra compared to PAM (<i>p</i>-value: 0.003) and MCR (<i>p</i>-value: 0.04) from a spiked blank sample. The results highlight that by utilizing the elution profiles in both chromatographic dimensions, clean mass spectra of analytes at trace levels measured in DIA can be extracted, allowing for more reliable compound identification compared to the workflows that were used for benchmarking.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The data processing workflows for comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC × LC) hyphenated to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) operated in data-independent acquisition (DIA) are limited compared to their one-dimensional counterparts. A two-step workflow is proposed to extract pure mass spectra from LC × LC-HRMS. First, a mass filtering (MF) algorithm groups ions belonging to the same compound based on their elution profile similarity in the first (1D) and second dimension (2D). Second, the filtered data are deconvoluted using multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to address potential coelution. The presented workflow is termed MF + MCR and was tested on pulsed elution-LC × LC-HRMS data from a wastewater effluent extract. The proposed workflow was benchmarked to the following three data processing strategies for mass spectra extraction: peak apex (PAM), using the MF approach alone, or using MCR without prior MF. The MF + MCR workflow identified 25 suspect compounds, compared to 23, 16, and 10 identified by MF, MCR, and PAM, respectively. The nine suspects that could not be identified using MCR compared to the MF + MCR all had low total signal contributions, i.e., low intensities compared to the TIC. This showed that adequate preprocessing prior to MCR is essential for trace level analysis. Additionally, it was shown that the MF + MCR workflow extracted statistically significantly purer mass spectra compared to PAM (p-value: 0.003) and MCR (p-value: 0.04) from a spiked blank sample. The results highlight that by utilizing the elution profiles in both chromatographic dimensions, clean mass spectra of analytes at trace levels measured in DIA can be extracted, allowing for more reliable compound identification compared to the workflows that were used for benchmarking.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信