Soft Robotics in Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation and Assistance: Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations.

Natalie Tanczak, Aaron Yurkewich, Francesco Missiroli, Seng Kwee Wee, Simone Kager, Hyungmin Choi, Kyu-Jin Cho, Hong Kai Yap, Cristina Piazza, Lorenzo Masia, Olivier Lambercy
{"title":"Soft Robotics in Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation and Assistance: Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations.","authors":"Natalie Tanczak, Aaron Yurkewich, Francesco Missiroli, Seng Kwee Wee, Simone Kager, Hyungmin Choi, Kyu-Jin Cho, Hong Kai Yap, Cristina Piazza, Lorenzo Masia, Olivier Lambercy","doi":"10.1089/soro.2024.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soft robotics is gaining interest in rehabilitation applications, bringing new opportunities to offset the loss of upper limb motor function following neurological, neuromuscular, or traumatic injuries. Unlike conventional rigid robotics, the added softness in linkages or joints promises to make rehabilitation robots compliant, which translates into higher levels of safety, comfort, usability, and portability, opening the door for these rehabilitation technologies to be used in daily life. While several reviews documented the different technical implementations of soft rehabilitation robots, it is essential to discuss the growing clinical evidence on the feasibility and effectiveness of using this technology for rehabilitative and assistive purposes, whether softness brings the expected advantages from the perspective of end users, and how we should proceed in the future of this field. In this perspective article, we present recent clinical evidence on how 13 different upper limb devices were used in both controlled (clinical) and uncontrolled (at home) settings in more than 37 clinical studies. From these findings and our own experience, we derive recommendations for future developers and end users regarding the design, application, and evaluation of soft robotics for upper limb rehabilitation and assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94210,"journal":{"name":"Soft robotics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soft robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2024.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft robotics is gaining interest in rehabilitation applications, bringing new opportunities to offset the loss of upper limb motor function following neurological, neuromuscular, or traumatic injuries. Unlike conventional rigid robotics, the added softness in linkages or joints promises to make rehabilitation robots compliant, which translates into higher levels of safety, comfort, usability, and portability, opening the door for these rehabilitation technologies to be used in daily life. While several reviews documented the different technical implementations of soft rehabilitation robots, it is essential to discuss the growing clinical evidence on the feasibility and effectiveness of using this technology for rehabilitative and assistive purposes, whether softness brings the expected advantages from the perspective of end users, and how we should proceed in the future of this field. In this perspective article, we present recent clinical evidence on how 13 different upper limb devices were used in both controlled (clinical) and uncontrolled (at home) settings in more than 37 clinical studies. From these findings and our own experience, we derive recommendations for future developers and end users regarding the design, application, and evaluation of soft robotics for upper limb rehabilitation and assistance.

软体机器人在上肢神经康复和辅助:目前的临床证据和建议。
软机器人在康复应用方面的兴趣越来越大,为弥补神经、神经肌肉或创伤性损伤后上肢运动功能的丧失带来了新的机会。与传统的刚性机器人不同,在连接或关节中增加的柔软性有望使康复机器人具有适应性,这意味着更高水平的安全性、舒适性、可用性和便携性,为这些康复技术在日常生活中的应用打开了大门。虽然有几篇综述记录了软康复机器人的不同技术实现,但有必要讨论越来越多的临床证据,证明将这项技术用于康复和辅助目的的可行性和有效性,从最终用户的角度来看,柔软是否带来了预期的优势,以及我们应该如何在这一领域的未来发展。在这篇前瞻性的文章中,我们介绍了最近的临床证据,在超过37项临床研究中,13种不同的上肢装置是如何在对照(临床)和非对照(家庭)环境中使用的。根据这些发现和我们自己的经验,我们为未来的开发者和最终用户提供了关于上肢康复和辅助软机器人的设计、应用和评估的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信