Long-term Outcomes of Geriatric Medicine Teaching Strategies: Comparing no Content, Traditional Lecture, and Flipped Classroom 2 Years Postintervention.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-08-03 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02118-5
Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Giancarlo Lucchetti
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes of Geriatric Medicine Teaching Strategies: Comparing no Content, Traditional Lecture, and Flipped Classroom 2 Years Postintervention.","authors":"Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Giancarlo Lucchetti","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02118-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-term effects of use of the flipped classroom to teach geriatric medicine are still underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether different educational interventions on geriatrics (i.e., flipped classrooms-FL and traditional lectures-TR) could have an influence on long-term attitudes and stereotypes among medical students compared to not having such exposure (control-CG) after 2 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An intervention study was conducted during the third year of medical school training. Two different educational strategies (FL and TR) were incorporated into a course of geriatrics. Students were evaluated at baseline, postintervention, and after 2 years of follow-up concerning their attitudes toward older persons (Maxwell-Sullivan, UCLA geriatric attitudes), empathy (Maxwell-Sullivan), knowledge and stereotypes (Palmore Facts on Aging), and self-reported opinions on older adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 medical students were included (68 CG, 72 TR, and 76 FL). At the 2-year follow-up, the FL had better scores than the TR on the Palmore Facts on Aging (<i>d</i> = 0.42); the FL had better scores than the control group for the Maxwell-Sullivan Attitudes (<i>d</i> = 0.40); and both the FL and TR had better scores for the Palmore Facts on Aging (<i>d</i> = 1.56 to 1.75) and the Likert items \"preparedness\" (<i>d</i> = 1.10 to 1.19), \"knowledge\" (<i>d</i> = 1.08 to 1.20), and \"prescribing\" (<i>d</i> = 0.33 to 0.40) compared to the CG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Teaching geriatric medicine could impact the long-term outcomes of medical students and the way this teaching is delivered can influence students' learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"34 6","pages":"1381-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02118-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The long-term effects of use of the flipped classroom to teach geriatric medicine are still underexplored.

Objective: To investigate whether different educational interventions on geriatrics (i.e., flipped classrooms-FL and traditional lectures-TR) could have an influence on long-term attitudes and stereotypes among medical students compared to not having such exposure (control-CG) after 2 years of follow-up.

Method: An intervention study was conducted during the third year of medical school training. Two different educational strategies (FL and TR) were incorporated into a course of geriatrics. Students were evaluated at baseline, postintervention, and after 2 years of follow-up concerning their attitudes toward older persons (Maxwell-Sullivan, UCLA geriatric attitudes), empathy (Maxwell-Sullivan), knowledge and stereotypes (Palmore Facts on Aging), and self-reported opinions on older adults.

Results: A total of 216 medical students were included (68 CG, 72 TR, and 76 FL). At the 2-year follow-up, the FL had better scores than the TR on the Palmore Facts on Aging (d = 0.42); the FL had better scores than the control group for the Maxwell-Sullivan Attitudes (d = 0.40); and both the FL and TR had better scores for the Palmore Facts on Aging (d = 1.56 to 1.75) and the Likert items "preparedness" (d = 1.10 to 1.19), "knowledge" (d = 1.08 to 1.20), and "prescribing" (d = 0.33 to 0.40) compared to the CG.

Conclusions: Teaching geriatric medicine could impact the long-term outcomes of medical students and the way this teaching is delivered can influence students' learning.

老年医学教学策略的长期效果:干预后2年无内容、传统课堂和翻转课堂的比较。
背景:利用翻转课堂进行老年医学教学的长期效果仍有待进一步研究。目的:通过2年的随访,探讨不同的老年医学教育干预(翻转课堂- fl和传统课堂- tr)对医学生长期态度和刻板印象的影响(对照- cg)。方法:对医学院三年级学生进行干预研究。两种不同的教学策略(FL和TR)被纳入老年病学课程。在基线、干预后和2年后的随访中,对学生进行评估,包括他们对老年人的态度(Maxwell-Sullivan, UCLA老年态度)、同理心(Maxwell-Sullivan)、知识和刻板印象(Palmore Facts on Aging)以及自我报告的对老年人的看法。结果:共纳入216名医学生,其中CG 68名,TR 72名,FL 76名。在2年随访中,FL在Palmore Facts on Aging上的得分优于TR (d = 0.42);实验组的麦克斯韦-沙利文态度得分高于对照组(d = 0.40);在Palmore Facts on Aging (d = 1.56 ~ 1.75)和Likert项目“preparation”(d = 1.10 ~ 1.19)、“knowledge”(d = 1.08 ~ 1.20)和“prescriding”(d = 0.33 ~ 0.40)上,FL和TR的得分均高于CG。结论:老年医学教学影响医学生的长期学习效果,教学方式影响学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信