Autistic Applicants’ Job Interview Experiences and Accommodation Preferences: An Intersectional Analysis

IF 9.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maira E. Ezerins, Lauren S. Simon, Christopher C. Rosen
{"title":"Autistic Applicants’ Job Interview Experiences and Accommodation Preferences: An Intersectional Analysis","authors":"Maira E. Ezerins, Lauren S. Simon, Christopher C. Rosen","doi":"10.1177/01492063241308214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although more organizations are seeking autistic applicants, autistic people remain in an unemployment crisis. This may be due in part to job interviews, which often implicitly evaluate relational and social skills—an area with which many autistic people struggle. To determine how to better support autistic applicants, we conduct a mixed methods study to identify, from their own perspective, the accommodations that would have the greatest impact on autistic individuals’ interview anxiety and performance. Additionally, we examine differences in interview anxiety and preferred adjustments to the interview process between both autistic and allistic participants and intersectionally across gender. Findings revealed additive effects of neurotype and gender on interview anxiety, with autistic participants reporting higher anxiety than allistic participants, and women reporting higher anxiety than men. Interestingly, despite a small number of notable differences, there were far more similarities between groups regarding preferred interview adjustments. These findings suggest that many adjustments to the interview process may be helpful across neurotypes, although they are perhaps particularly beneficial for alleviating the comparatively higher anxiety levels experienced by autistic applicants. Overall, there is a need to consider how and whether current interview best practices (e.g., standardization and structure) can be adapted to facilitate the inclusion of diverse neurotypes across a range of individual differences. As a starting point, we offer practical guidelines for managers wishing to improve the interview process for autistic and allistic applicants alike and set a foundation for future research.","PeriodicalId":54212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241308214","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although more organizations are seeking autistic applicants, autistic people remain in an unemployment crisis. This may be due in part to job interviews, which often implicitly evaluate relational and social skills—an area with which many autistic people struggle. To determine how to better support autistic applicants, we conduct a mixed methods study to identify, from their own perspective, the accommodations that would have the greatest impact on autistic individuals’ interview anxiety and performance. Additionally, we examine differences in interview anxiety and preferred adjustments to the interview process between both autistic and allistic participants and intersectionally across gender. Findings revealed additive effects of neurotype and gender on interview anxiety, with autistic participants reporting higher anxiety than allistic participants, and women reporting higher anxiety than men. Interestingly, despite a small number of notable differences, there were far more similarities between groups regarding preferred interview adjustments. These findings suggest that many adjustments to the interview process may be helpful across neurotypes, although they are perhaps particularly beneficial for alleviating the comparatively higher anxiety levels experienced by autistic applicants. Overall, there is a need to consider how and whether current interview best practices (e.g., standardization and structure) can be adapted to facilitate the inclusion of diverse neurotypes across a range of individual differences. As a starting point, we offer practical guidelines for managers wishing to improve the interview process for autistic and allistic applicants alike and set a foundation for future research.
自闭症申请人的求职面试经历与住宿偏好:一个交叉分析
虽然越来越多的机构在寻找自闭症患者,但自闭症患者仍然处于失业危机之中。这在一定程度上可能是由于工作面试,它通常会含蓄地评估人际关系和社交技能——这是许多自闭症患者难以做到的。为了确定如何更好地支持自闭症申请人,我们进行了一项混合方法研究,从他们自己的角度确定对自闭症个体面试焦虑和表现影响最大的住宿。此外,我们还研究了自闭症和自闭症参与者在面试焦虑和对面试过程的偏好调整方面的差异,以及跨性别的交叉。研究结果揭示了神经类型和性别对面试焦虑的累加效应,自闭症参与者报告的焦虑程度高于自闭症参与者,女性报告的焦虑程度高于男性。有趣的是,尽管有一些显著的差异,但在偏好面试调整方面,两组之间有更多的相似之处。这些发现表明,对面试过程的许多调整可能对所有神经类型的人都有帮助,尽管它们可能对缓解自闭症申请人相对较高的焦虑水平特别有益。总的来说,有必要考虑如何以及是否可以调整当前的面试最佳实践(例如,标准化和结构),以促进跨越个体差异范围的不同神经类型的纳入。作为起点,我们为希望改善自闭症和自闭症申请者面试过程的管理者提供了实用的指导方针,并为未来的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management (JOM) aims to publish rigorous empirical and theoretical research articles that significantly contribute to the field of management. It is particularly interested in papers that have a strong impact on the overall management discipline. JOM also encourages the submission of novel ideas and fresh perspectives on existing research. The journal covers a wide range of areas, including business strategy and policy, organizational behavior, human resource management, organizational theory, entrepreneurship, and research methods. It provides a platform for scholars to present their work on these topics and fosters intellectual discussion and exchange in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信