Enhanced crayfish optimization algorithm with differential evolution’s mutation and crossover strategies for global optimization and engineering applications

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Binanda Maiti, Saptadeep Biswas, Absalom El-Shamir Ezugwu, Uttam Kumar Bera, Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani, Fahad Alblehai, Laith Abualigah
{"title":"Enhanced crayfish optimization algorithm with differential evolution’s mutation and crossover strategies for global optimization and engineering applications","authors":"Binanda Maiti,&nbsp;Saptadeep Biswas,&nbsp;Absalom El-Shamir Ezugwu,&nbsp;Uttam Kumar Bera,&nbsp;Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani,&nbsp;Fahad Alblehai,&nbsp;Laith Abualigah","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-11069-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Optimization algorithms play a crucial role in solving complex challenges across various fields, including engineering, finance, and data science. This study introduces a novel hybrid optimization algorithm, the Hybrid Crayfish Optimization Algorithm with Differential Evolution (HCOADE), which addresses the limitations of premature convergence and inadequate exploitation in the traditional Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). By integrating COA with Differential Evolution (DE) strategies, HCOADE leverages DE’s mutation and crossover mechanisms to enhance global optimization performance. The COA, inspired by the foraging and social behaviors of crayfish, provides a flexible framework for exploring the solution space, while DE’s robust strategies effectively exploit this space. To evaluate HCOADE’s performance, extensive experiments are conducted using 34 benchmark functions from CEC 2014 and CEC 2017, as well as six engineering design problems. The results are compared with ten leading optimization algorithms, including classical COA, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Moth-flame Optimization (MFO), Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA), Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), Constriction Coefficient-Based Particle Swarm Optimization Gravitational Search Algorithm (CPSOGSA), and Biogeography-based Optimization (BBO). The average rankings and results from the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test provide a comprehensive comparison of HCOADE’s performance, clearly demonstrating its superiority. Furthermore, HCOADE’s performance is assessed on the CEC 2020 and CEC 2022 test suites, further confirming its effectiveness. A comparative analysis against notable winners from the CEC competitions, including LSHADEcnEpSin, LSHADESPACMA, and CMA-ES, using the CEC-2017 test suite, revealed superior results for HCOADE. This study underscores the advantages of integrating DE strategies with COA and offers valuable insights for addressing complex global optimization problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-11069-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-11069-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimization algorithms play a crucial role in solving complex challenges across various fields, including engineering, finance, and data science. This study introduces a novel hybrid optimization algorithm, the Hybrid Crayfish Optimization Algorithm with Differential Evolution (HCOADE), which addresses the limitations of premature convergence and inadequate exploitation in the traditional Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA). By integrating COA with Differential Evolution (DE) strategies, HCOADE leverages DE’s mutation and crossover mechanisms to enhance global optimization performance. The COA, inspired by the foraging and social behaviors of crayfish, provides a flexible framework for exploring the solution space, while DE’s robust strategies effectively exploit this space. To evaluate HCOADE’s performance, extensive experiments are conducted using 34 benchmark functions from CEC 2014 and CEC 2017, as well as six engineering design problems. The results are compared with ten leading optimization algorithms, including classical COA, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Moth-flame Optimization (MFO), Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA), Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), Constriction Coefficient-Based Particle Swarm Optimization Gravitational Search Algorithm (CPSOGSA), and Biogeography-based Optimization (BBO). The average rankings and results from the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test provide a comprehensive comparison of HCOADE’s performance, clearly demonstrating its superiority. Furthermore, HCOADE’s performance is assessed on the CEC 2020 and CEC 2022 test suites, further confirming its effectiveness. A comparative analysis against notable winners from the CEC competitions, including LSHADEcnEpSin, LSHADESPACMA, and CMA-ES, using the CEC-2017 test suite, revealed superior results for HCOADE. This study underscores the advantages of integrating DE strategies with COA and offers valuable insights for addressing complex global optimization problems.

基于差分进化突变和交叉策略的小龙虾全局优化算法及工程应用
优化算法在解决包括工程、金融和数据科学在内的各个领域的复杂挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本文提出了一种新的混合优化算法——差分进化混合小龙虾优化算法(HCOADE),该算法解决了传统小龙虾优化算法(COA)过早收敛和开发不足的局限性。HCOADE通过将COA与差分进化(DE)策略相结合,利用差分进化的突变和交叉机制来提高全局优化性能。受小龙虾觅食和社交行为的启发,COA为探索解决方案空间提供了一个灵活的框架,而DE的鲁棒策略有效地利用了这个空间。为了评估HCOADE的性能,使用了CEC 2014和CEC 2017中的34个基准函数以及6个工程设计问题进行了广泛的实验。结果与经典COA算法、粒子群优化算法(PSO)、灰狼优化算法(GWO)、鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)、蛾-火焰优化算法(MFO)、Salp群算法(SSA)、爬行动物搜索算法(RSA)、正弦余弦算法(SCA)、基于收缩系数的粒子群优化引力搜索算法(CPSOGSA)和基于生物地理的优化算法(BBO)等10种主流优化算法进行了比较。Wilcoxon秩和测试的平均排名和结果提供了对HCOADE性能的全面比较,清楚地显示了其优势。此外,HCOADE的性能在CEC 2020和CEC 2022测试套件上进行了评估,进一步证实了其有效性。使用CEC-2017测试套件,与CEC竞赛中著名的获奖者(包括LSHADEcnEpSin、LSHADESPACMA和CMA-ES)进行比较分析,发现HCOADE的结果更优。该研究强调了将DE策略与COA集成的优势,并为解决复杂的全局优化问题提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信