Noémie Vanden Haute, Emma Bach, Pierre Bouletreau, Alice Prevost, Pierre Corre, Louis Brochet, Nicolas Graillon, Andrea Varazzani
{"title":"An updated overview of orthognathic surgery practices in France.","authors":"Noémie Vanden Haute, Emma Bach, Pierre Bouletreau, Alice Prevost, Pierre Corre, Louis Brochet, Nicolas Graillon, Andrea Varazzani","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthognathic surgery is a fundamental component of a maxillofacial surgeon's practice. In France, 510 specialists actively practice oral and maxillofacial surgery. In OMFs, despite the existence of evidence-based recommendation that address diagnosis, treatment planning, and operating methods, each surgeon/institution has developed an individual approach towards clinical management. This study comprehensively overviews the current practices of French orthognathic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was electronically sent to 500 oral and maxillofacial surgeons in France, some of whom practiced orthognathic surgery and some of whom did not. The answers were anonymous.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 52 responses. With consensus on 12 of the practical, economic, and peri-operative questions. We didn't find difference on any topics where the surgeon has his residence or the age of the surgeon. Management and correction of occlusal disorders were the primary indications for osteotomy. Of all responders, 42 % were in private practice. Both virtual and conventional planning methods were used, with no clear preference for either method. During bimaxillary surgery, 76 % of surgeons initially osteotomised and stabilised the maxilla; 69 % used an intermediate splint. ERAS protocols are not used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is an update and it provides new information compared a 2002 report on orthognathic surgery in France. It highlights a consensus on conventional planning but no significant influence from academic centers, age, or experience on surgical practices. New technologies and ERAS protocols are underused despite their benefits for safer surgeries. There is a lack of standardized procedures, leading to varied practices despite a national teaching program. More data and practitioner involvement are needed to develop French and European guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Orthognathic surgery is a fundamental component of a maxillofacial surgeon's practice. In France, 510 specialists actively practice oral and maxillofacial surgery. In OMFs, despite the existence of evidence-based recommendation that address diagnosis, treatment planning, and operating methods, each surgeon/institution has developed an individual approach towards clinical management. This study comprehensively overviews the current practices of French orthognathic surgeons.
Methods: A questionnaire was electronically sent to 500 oral and maxillofacial surgeons in France, some of whom practiced orthognathic surgery and some of whom did not. The answers were anonymous.
Results: We obtained 52 responses. With consensus on 12 of the practical, economic, and peri-operative questions. We didn't find difference on any topics where the surgeon has his residence or the age of the surgeon. Management and correction of occlusal disorders were the primary indications for osteotomy. Of all responders, 42 % were in private practice. Both virtual and conventional planning methods were used, with no clear preference for either method. During bimaxillary surgery, 76 % of surgeons initially osteotomised and stabilised the maxilla; 69 % used an intermediate splint. ERAS protocols are not used.
Conclusion: This study is an update and it provides new information compared a 2002 report on orthognathic surgery in France. It highlights a consensus on conventional planning but no significant influence from academic centers, age, or experience on surgical practices. New technologies and ERAS protocols are underused despite their benefits for safer surgeries. There is a lack of standardized procedures, leading to varied practices despite a national teaching program. More data and practitioner involvement are needed to develop French and European guidelines.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.