Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategy through machine learning models and web-based prognostic tool.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Sakhr Alshwayyat, Hanan M Qasem, Lina Khasawneh, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Mesk Alkhatib, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Hamza Al Salieti, Ramez M Odat
{"title":"Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategy through machine learning models and web-based prognostic tool.","authors":"Sakhr Alshwayyat, Hanan M Qasem, Lina Khasawneh, Mustafa Alshwayyat, Mesk Alkhatib, Tala Abdulsalam Alshwayyat, Hamza Al Salieti, Ramez M Odat","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral cancer, particularly mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), presents diagnostic challenges due to its histological diversity and rarity. This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict survival outcomes for MEC patients and pioneer a clinically accessible prognostic tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the SEER database (2000-2020), we constructed predictive models with five ML algorithms: Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Predictive variables were identified via Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survival trends. Model performance was validated through the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1314 patients diagnosed with MEC of the oral cavity. The RFC demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.55), followed by the GBC and RFC (AUC = 0.53). The most affected primary site was the hard palate, followed by the retromolar and cheek mucosa. Survival rates varied with the treatment modality, with the highest rates observed in patients undergoing surgery alone. ML models have identified age, sex, and metastasis as significant prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes, underscoring the complexity and heterogeneity of MEC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights ML's potential to enhance survival predictions and personalize treatment for MEC patients. We developed the first web-based prognostic tool, providing a novel, accessible solution for improving clinical decision-making in MEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral cancer, particularly mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), presents diagnostic challenges due to its histological diversity and rarity. This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict survival outcomes for MEC patients and pioneer a clinically accessible prognostic tool.

Methods: Using the SEER database (2000-2020), we constructed predictive models with five ML algorithms: Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Predictive variables were identified via Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survival trends. Model performance was validated through the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: This study included 1314 patients diagnosed with MEC of the oral cavity. The RFC demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.55), followed by the GBC and RFC (AUC = 0.53). The most affected primary site was the hard palate, followed by the retromolar and cheek mucosa. Survival rates varied with the treatment modality, with the highest rates observed in patients undergoing surgery alone. ML models have identified age, sex, and metastasis as significant prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes, underscoring the complexity and heterogeneity of MEC.

Conclusions: This study highlights ML's potential to enhance survival predictions and personalize treatment for MEC patients. We developed the first web-based prognostic tool, providing a novel, accessible solution for improving clinical decision-making in MEC.

黏液表皮样癌:通过机器学习模型和基于网络的预后工具提高诊断准确性和治疗策略。
背景:口腔癌,特别是粘液表皮样癌(MEC),由于其组织学多样性和罕见性,提出了诊断挑战。本研究旨在开发机器学习(ML)模型来预测MEC患者的生存结果,并开创一种临床可获得的预后工具。方法:利用SEER数据库(2000-2020),采用随机森林分类器(RFC)、梯度增强分类器(GBC)、逻辑回归(LR)、k近邻(KNN)和多层感知器(MLP)五种机器学习算法构建预测模型。通过Cox回归确定预测变量,Kaplan-Meier分析评估生存趋势。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)验证模型的性能。结果:本研究纳入1314例诊断为口腔MEC的患者。RFC的预测准确率最高(AUC = 0.55),其次是GBC和RFC (AUC = 0.53)。主要发病部位为硬腭,其次为后磨牙和颊黏膜。生存率因治疗方式而异,单独接受手术的患者生存率最高。ML模型已经确定年龄、性别和转移是影响生存结果的重要预后因素,强调了MEC的复杂性和异质性。结论:这项研究强调了ML提高MEC患者生存预测和个性化治疗的潜力。我们开发了第一个基于网络的预后工具,为改善MEC的临床决策提供了一种新颖的、可访问的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信