Sample size estimation for task-related functional MRI studies using Bayesian updating.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101489
Eduard T Klapwijk, Joran Jongerling, Herbert Hoijtink, Eveline A Crone
{"title":"Sample size estimation for task-related functional MRI studies using Bayesian updating.","authors":"Eduard T Klapwijk, Joran Jongerling, Herbert Hoijtink, Eveline A Crone","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Task-related functional MRI (fMRI) studies need to be properly powered with an adequate sample size to reliably detect effects of interest. But for most fMRI studies, it is not straightforward to determine a proper sample size using power calculations based on published effect sizes. Here, we present an alternative approach of sample size estimation with empirical Bayesian updating. First, this method provides an estimate of the required sample size using existing data from a similar task and similar region of interest. Using this estimate researchers can plan their research project, and report empirically determined sample size estimations in their research proposal or pre-registration. Second, researchers can expand the sample size estimations with new data. We illustrate this approach using four existing fMRI data sets where Cohen's d is the effect size of interest for the hemodynamic response in the task condition of interest versus a control condition, and where a Pearson correlation between task effect and age is the covariate of interest. We show that sample sizes to reliably detect effects differ between various tasks and regions of interest. We provide an R package to allow researchers to use Bayesian updating with other task-related fMRI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"71 ","pages":"101489"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task-related functional MRI (fMRI) studies need to be properly powered with an adequate sample size to reliably detect effects of interest. But for most fMRI studies, it is not straightforward to determine a proper sample size using power calculations based on published effect sizes. Here, we present an alternative approach of sample size estimation with empirical Bayesian updating. First, this method provides an estimate of the required sample size using existing data from a similar task and similar region of interest. Using this estimate researchers can plan their research project, and report empirically determined sample size estimations in their research proposal or pre-registration. Second, researchers can expand the sample size estimations with new data. We illustrate this approach using four existing fMRI data sets where Cohen's d is the effect size of interest for the hemodynamic response in the task condition of interest versus a control condition, and where a Pearson correlation between task effect and age is the covariate of interest. We show that sample sizes to reliably detect effects differ between various tasks and regions of interest. We provide an R package to allow researchers to use Bayesian updating with other task-related fMRI studies.

用贝叶斯更新估计任务相关功能MRI研究的样本量。
任务相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究需要适当的动力与足够的样本量,以可靠地检测感兴趣的影响。但对于大多数fMRI研究来说,利用基于已发表的效应量的功率计算来确定适当的样本量并不是直截了当的。在这里,我们提出了一种用经验贝叶斯更新的样本大小估计的替代方法。首先,该方法使用来自相似任务和相似感兴趣区域的现有数据提供所需样本量的估计。使用这个估计,研究人员可以计划他们的研究项目,并报告经验确定的样本量估计在他们的研究计划或预注册。其次,研究人员可以用新数据扩大样本量估计。我们使用四个现有的fMRI数据集来说明这种方法,其中Cohen's d是感兴趣的任务条件下与对照条件下血流动力学反应的效应大小,其中任务效应和年龄之间的Pearson相关性是感兴趣的协变量。我们表明,在不同的任务和感兴趣的区域之间,可靠地检测效果的样本量是不同的。我们提供了一个R包,允许研究人员使用贝叶斯更新与其他任务相关的fMRI研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信