Prevailing theories describing sports-related concussion symptom reporting intent and behavior among adolescent athletes: a scoping review.

Abstract

Diagnosis of sports-related concussion (SRC) primarily relies on an athlete's self-report of injury and associated symptoms. Social pressures and attitudes surrounding SRC influence athlete reporting behavior. Unfortunately, underreporting of SRC symptoms is an issue among adolescent athletes. Nondisclosure of SRC symptoms may lead to premature return-to-play and potential persistent symptoms. This scoping review summarizes prevailing theories that explain SRC symptom reporting intent and behavior among adolescent athletes. Literature was reviewed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Review guidelines. Inter-rater reliability was calculated at each stage. Thirty-four articles published between 2013-2024 were included. Inter-rater reliability was fair to perfect across all review stages. Of the 16 unique theories described, the Theory of Reasoned Action/Theory of Planned Behavior (TRA/TPB) was the most frequently cited theory explaining SRC symptom reporting behavior. Although the TRA/TPB framework was useful when predicting SRC symptom reporting intent, it did not adequately predict reporting behavior, consistent with the broader health behavior literature which has established that intention is not a good predictor of behavior. In light of these findings, new frameworks must be considered that consider neurodevelopmental, cognitive, and cultural factors, as these may be more useful for understanding SRC symptom reporting behavior in adolescence.