Old strategies, new environments: Reinforcement Learning on social media.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Georgia Turner, Amanda M Ferguson, Tanay Katiyar, Stefano Palminteri, Amy Orben
{"title":"Old strategies, new environments: Reinforcement Learning on social media.","authors":"Georgia Turner, Amanda M Ferguson, Tanay Katiyar, Stefano Palminteri, Amy Orben","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of social media has profoundly altered the social world - introducing new behaviours which can satisfy our social needs. However, it is yet unknown whether human social strategies, which are well-adapted to the offline world we developed in, operate as effectively within this new social environment. Here, we describe how the computational framework of Reinforcement Learning can help us to precisely frame this problem and diagnose where behaviour-environment mismatches emerge. The Reinforcement Learning framework describes a process by which an agent can learn to maximise their long-term reward. Reinforcement Learning, which has proven successful in characterising human social behaviour, consists of three stages: updating expected reward, valuating expected reward by integrating subjective costs such as effort, and selecting an action. Specific social media affordances, such as the quantifiability of social feedback, might interact with the Reinforcement Learning process at each of these stages. In some cases, affordances can exploit Reinforcement Learning biases which are beneficial offline, by violating the environmental conditions under which such biases are optimal - such as when algorithmic personalisation of content interacts with confirmation bias. Characterising the impact of specific aspects of social media through this lens can improve our understanding of how digital environments shape human behaviour. Ultimately, this formal framework could help address pressing open questions about social media use, including its changing role across human development, and its impact on outcomes such as mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of social media has profoundly altered the social world - introducing new behaviours which can satisfy our social needs. However, it is yet unknown whether human social strategies, which are well-adapted to the offline world we developed in, operate as effectively within this new social environment. Here, we describe how the computational framework of Reinforcement Learning can help us to precisely frame this problem and diagnose where behaviour-environment mismatches emerge. The Reinforcement Learning framework describes a process by which an agent can learn to maximise their long-term reward. Reinforcement Learning, which has proven successful in characterising human social behaviour, consists of three stages: updating expected reward, valuating expected reward by integrating subjective costs such as effort, and selecting an action. Specific social media affordances, such as the quantifiability of social feedback, might interact with the Reinforcement Learning process at each of these stages. In some cases, affordances can exploit Reinforcement Learning biases which are beneficial offline, by violating the environmental conditions under which such biases are optimal - such as when algorithmic personalisation of content interacts with confirmation bias. Characterising the impact of specific aspects of social media through this lens can improve our understanding of how digital environments shape human behaviour. Ultimately, this formal framework could help address pressing open questions about social media use, including its changing role across human development, and its impact on outcomes such as mental health.

旧策略,新环境:社交媒体上的强化学习。
社交媒体的兴起深刻地改变了社会世界——引入了能够满足我们社交需求的新行为。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,人类的社会策略是否在这种新的社会环境中有效地运作,这些策略已经很好地适应了我们所处的离线世界。在这里,我们描述了强化学习的计算框架如何帮助我们精确地构建这个问题,并诊断行为-环境不匹配出现的地方。强化学习框架描述了一个过程,通过这个过程,智能体可以学习最大化他们的长期回报。事实证明,强化学习在描述人类社会行为方面是成功的,它包括三个阶段:更新预期奖励,通过整合主观成本(如努力)来评估预期奖励,以及选择行动。特定的社交媒体支持,如社交反馈的可量化性,可能会在这些阶段与强化学习过程相互作用。在某些情况下,启示可以利用强化学习偏差,这在线下是有益的,通过违反这种偏差最优的环境条件——比如当内容的算法个性化与确认偏差交互时。通过这一视角描述社交媒体特定方面的影响,可以提高我们对数字环境如何塑造人类行为的理解。最终,这个正式的框架可以帮助解决关于社交媒体使用的紧迫开放问题,包括它在人类发展中的作用变化,以及它对心理健康等结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信