{"title":"Factors influencing the efficacy and implementation of teletherapy for stuttering.","authors":"Rasha Sami, Sherine Ramzy","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2444523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: Telepractice is a promising alternative to treat children who stutter. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing telepractice for treating stuttering in a group of school-aged children. <b>Methods:</b> This study involved 20 children aged 7 to 9 years diagnosed with moderate to severe stuttering using the Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI) - Arabic version. The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (SB-5), Fifth Edition was applied. Speech teletherapy via Zoom application was employed for 9 months by the same speech pathologists. After treatment, SSI was measured to check the improvement and to correlate the results to age, sex, and IQ subtests. <b>Results:</b> The SSI scores decreased significantly after treatment (p < 0.001) with a mean percentage of change of 57.4 ± 27.1% (21.7%-100%). Stuttering severity decreased significantly after teletherapy (p < 0.001); all children with moderate stuttering (n = 12) were converted to slight severity. Three out of eight of those with severe stuttering (37.5%), had slight severity after the end of treatment. The children's attendance and attention during treatment sessions were excellent sessions. The scores on all components of the SB scales and the full-scale IQ were average scores in all children. The treatment outcome was not affected by the children's age, sex, or IQ. <b>Conclusion</b>: Teletherapy for 9 months is successful in reducing stuttering scores and severity in school-age children. The outcome of treatment was not affected by the child's age, sex, and IQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2444523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Telepractice is a promising alternative to treat children who stutter. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing telepractice for treating stuttering in a group of school-aged children. Methods: This study involved 20 children aged 7 to 9 years diagnosed with moderate to severe stuttering using the Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI) - Arabic version. The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (SB-5), Fifth Edition was applied. Speech teletherapy via Zoom application was employed for 9 months by the same speech pathologists. After treatment, SSI was measured to check the improvement and to correlate the results to age, sex, and IQ subtests. Results: The SSI scores decreased significantly after treatment (p < 0.001) with a mean percentage of change of 57.4 ± 27.1% (21.7%-100%). Stuttering severity decreased significantly after teletherapy (p < 0.001); all children with moderate stuttering (n = 12) were converted to slight severity. Three out of eight of those with severe stuttering (37.5%), had slight severity after the end of treatment. The children's attendance and attention during treatment sessions were excellent sessions. The scores on all components of the SB scales and the full-scale IQ were average scores in all children. The treatment outcome was not affected by the children's age, sex, or IQ. Conclusion: Teletherapy for 9 months is successful in reducing stuttering scores and severity in school-age children. The outcome of treatment was not affected by the child's age, sex, and IQ.
期刊介绍:
Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.