{"title":"Cognitive regulation of alternative proteins: Positive reappraisal enhances wanting for insects, plant-based meat analogies, cultured meat, and algae.","authors":"Kosuke Motoki, Yu Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative proteins have attracted increasing attention from researchers and industry. Generally, consumers exhibit reluctance toward accepting alternative proteins. However, the potential of cognitive strategies to enhance consumer acceptance of alternative proteins remains unclear. Drawing on the literature on emotion regulation, we investigated whether emotion-regulation strategies, particularly positive cognitive reappraisal, could increase positive emotions and the wanting for alternative proteins. Across two pre-registered studies, our findings revealed that positive cognitive reappraisal significantly increased the wanting for various alternative proteins, including insects, plant-based meat analogs, cultured meat, and algae compared with looking at the alternative proteins. Additionally, an increase in the wanting for alternative proteins was mediated by an increase in positive emotional responses. In other words, positive cognitive reappraisal (versus looking at alternative proteins) enhances positive emotional responses to alternative proteins, which in turn enhances wanting for alternative proteins. These findings reveal the role of cognitive strategies in enhancing consumer acceptance of alternative proteins and suggest that interventions focusing on positive cognitive reappraisal could effectively increase consumer acceptance of alternative proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alternative proteins have attracted increasing attention from researchers and industry. Generally, consumers exhibit reluctance toward accepting alternative proteins. However, the potential of cognitive strategies to enhance consumer acceptance of alternative proteins remains unclear. Drawing on the literature on emotion regulation, we investigated whether emotion-regulation strategies, particularly positive cognitive reappraisal, could increase positive emotions and the wanting for alternative proteins. Across two pre-registered studies, our findings revealed that positive cognitive reappraisal significantly increased the wanting for various alternative proteins, including insects, plant-based meat analogs, cultured meat, and algae compared with looking at the alternative proteins. Additionally, an increase in the wanting for alternative proteins was mediated by an increase in positive emotional responses. In other words, positive cognitive reappraisal (versus looking at alternative proteins) enhances positive emotional responses to alternative proteins, which in turn enhances wanting for alternative proteins. These findings reveal the role of cognitive strategies in enhancing consumer acceptance of alternative proteins and suggest that interventions focusing on positive cognitive reappraisal could effectively increase consumer acceptance of alternative proteins.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.