Design and implementation of a multicenter protocol to obtain impulse oscillometry data in preterm children.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/ped4.12450
Katharine Tsukahara, Clement L Ren, Julian Allen, Carla Bann, Joseph McDonough, Kristina Ziolkowski, Charles C Clem, Sara B DeMauro
{"title":"Design and implementation of a multicenter protocol to obtain impulse oscillometry data in preterm children.","authors":"Katharine Tsukahara, Clement L Ren, Julian Allen, Carla Bann, Joseph McDonough, Kristina Ziolkowski, Charles C Clem, Sara B DeMauro","doi":"10.1002/ped4.12450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Objective measures of lung function are critical for assessing respiratory outcomes of prematurity. Among extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) (< 29 weeks gestational age), high rates of neurodevelopmental impairment may interfere with lung function testing. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive test of respiratory system mechanics not requiring forced expiration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a multicenter study design for respiratory follow-up testing in a cohort with a high rate of extreme prematurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>School-age children enrolled in two prior trials of ELGANs and term controls were assessed by IOS at five centers. Groups consisted of children with prematurity with a high incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, children with prematurity with no or minimal lung disease, and healthy term children. A rigorous centralized review process reviewed IOS studies for technical acceptability. Approach to design and implementation, rates of feasibility and success, and characteristics of participants are described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 children were recruited, of whom 239 (98%) attempted oscillometry. There were high rates of technical acceptability across all three cohorts (85%-90% of attempted tests), and across all five centers (80%-94% of attempted tests). Respiratory and neuromotor clinical factors associated with testing failure included a higher number of days on ventilation during neonatal intensive care, a history of intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, and gross motor functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We report high rates of feasibility and success of oscillometry in a large multicenter ELGAN population, in whom neurological and developmental comorbidities likely play a confounding role.</p>","PeriodicalId":19992,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Investigation","volume":"8 4","pages":"253-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ped4.12450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Objective measures of lung function are critical for assessing respiratory outcomes of prematurity. Among extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) (< 29 weeks gestational age), high rates of neurodevelopmental impairment may interfere with lung function testing. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive test of respiratory system mechanics not requiring forced expiration.

Objective: To describe a multicenter study design for respiratory follow-up testing in a cohort with a high rate of extreme prematurity.

Methods: School-age children enrolled in two prior trials of ELGANs and term controls were assessed by IOS at five centers. Groups consisted of children with prematurity with a high incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, children with prematurity with no or minimal lung disease, and healthy term children. A rigorous centralized review process reviewed IOS studies for technical acceptability. Approach to design and implementation, rates of feasibility and success, and characteristics of participants are described.

Results: A total of 243 children were recruited, of whom 239 (98%) attempted oscillometry. There were high rates of technical acceptability across all three cohorts (85%-90% of attempted tests), and across all five centers (80%-94% of attempted tests). Respiratory and neuromotor clinical factors associated with testing failure included a higher number of days on ventilation during neonatal intensive care, a history of intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, and gross motor functional impairment.

Interpretation: We report high rates of feasibility and success of oscillometry in a large multicenter ELGAN population, in whom neurological and developmental comorbidities likely play a confounding role.

设计和实现一个多中心协议,以获得早产儿脉冲振荡数据。
重要性:肺功能的客观测量是评估早产儿呼吸结局的关键。在极低胎龄新生儿(elgan)(< 29周胎龄)中,神经发育障碍的高发率可能会干扰肺功能检测。脉冲振荡测量法(IOS)是一种无创的呼吸系统力学测试,不需要强制呼气。目的:描述一项多中心研究设计,用于高极端早产率队列的呼吸随访测试。方法:在5个中心采用IOS对参加elgan和学期对照试验的学龄儿童进行评估。组由支气管肺发育不良高发的早产儿、无或极少肺部疾病的早产儿和健康足月儿童组成。严格的集中审查过程审查了IOS研究的技术可接受性。描述了设计和实施的方法、可行性和成功率以及参与者的特征。结果:共招募243名儿童,其中239人(98%)尝试振荡测量法。在所有三个队列(85%-90%的尝试测试)和所有五个中心(80%-94%的尝试测试)中,技术可接受性都很高。与测试失败相关的呼吸和神经运动临床因素包括新生儿重症监护期间使用通气的天数较高,有3级或4级脑室内出血史,以及大运动功能障碍。解释:我们报告了振荡测量法在大型多中心ELGAN人群中的高可行性和成功率,其中神经和发育合并症可能起混淆作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Investigation
Pediatric Investigation Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信