Felix J Dorfner, Janis L Vahldiek, Leonhard Donle, Andrei Zhukov, Lina Xu, Hartmut Häntze, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo J W L Aerts, Fabian Proft, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Judith Rademacher, Mikhail Protopopov, Hildrun Haibel, Kay-Geert Hermann, Torsten Diekhoff, Lisa C Adams, Murat Torgutalp, Denis Poddubnyy, Keno K Bressem
{"title":"Anatomy-centred deep learning improves generalisability and progression prediction in radiographic sacroiliitis detection.","authors":"Felix J Dorfner, Janis L Vahldiek, Leonhard Donle, Andrei Zhukov, Lina Xu, Hartmut Häntze, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo J W L Aerts, Fabian Proft, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Judith Rademacher, Mikhail Protopopov, Hildrun Haibel, Kay-Geert Hermann, Torsten Diekhoff, Lisa C Adams, Murat Torgutalp, Denis Poddubnyy, Keno K Bressem","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether incorporating anatomy-centred deep learning can improve generalisability and enable prediction of disease progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicentre study included conventional pelvic radiographs of four different patient cohorts focusing on axial spondyloarthritis collected at university and community hospitals. The first cohort, which consisted of 1483 radiographs, was split into training (n=1261) and validation (n=222) sets. The other cohorts comprising 436, 340 and 163 patients, respectively, were used as independent test datasets. For the second cohort, follow-up data of 311 patients was used to examine progression prediction capabilities. Two neural networks were trained, one on images cropped to the bounding box of the sacroiliac joints (anatomy-centred) and the other one on full radiographs. The performance of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the three test datasets, the standard model achieved AUC scores of 0.853, 0.817, 0.947, with an accuracy of 0.770, 0.724, 0.850. Whereas the anatomy-centred model achieved AUC scores of 0.899, 0.846, 0.957, with an accuracy of 0.821, 0.744, 0.906, respectively. The patients who were identified as high risk by the anatomy-centred model had an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.19, 3.86) for having progression of radiographic sacroiliitis within 2 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anatomy-centred deep learning can improve the generalisability of models in detecting radiographic sacroiliitis. The model is published as fully open source alongside this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To examine whether incorporating anatomy-centred deep learning can improve generalisability and enable prediction of disease progression.
Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included conventional pelvic radiographs of four different patient cohorts focusing on axial spondyloarthritis collected at university and community hospitals. The first cohort, which consisted of 1483 radiographs, was split into training (n=1261) and validation (n=222) sets. The other cohorts comprising 436, 340 and 163 patients, respectively, were used as independent test datasets. For the second cohort, follow-up data of 311 patients was used to examine progression prediction capabilities. Two neural networks were trained, one on images cropped to the bounding box of the sacroiliac joints (anatomy-centred) and the other one on full radiographs. The performance of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
Results: On the three test datasets, the standard model achieved AUC scores of 0.853, 0.817, 0.947, with an accuracy of 0.770, 0.724, 0.850. Whereas the anatomy-centred model achieved AUC scores of 0.899, 0.846, 0.957, with an accuracy of 0.821, 0.744, 0.906, respectively. The patients who were identified as high risk by the anatomy-centred model had an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.19, 3.86) for having progression of radiographic sacroiliitis within 2 years.
Conclusion: Anatomy-centred deep learning can improve the generalisability of models in detecting radiographic sacroiliitis. The model is published as fully open source alongside this study.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.