Developing a co-benefits evaluation model to optimize greening coverage designs on university campuses in hot and humid areas

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Xiaoqing Zhou , Simin Deng , Yongbo Cui , Chengliang Fan
{"title":"Developing a co-benefits evaluation model to optimize greening coverage designs on university campuses in hot and humid areas","authors":"Xiaoqing Zhou ,&nbsp;Simin Deng ,&nbsp;Yongbo Cui ,&nbsp;Chengliang Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The thermal environment of university campuses significantly impacts human comfort and building energy consumption, particularly in regions with hot and humid climates. Optimizing green space can effectively alleviate high-temperature issues and enhance cooling effects (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), ventilation effects (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>), and carbon sequestration benefits (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>). Given the limited land resources in campus areas, it is critical to optimize the design of green spaces to maximize their multiple benefits. This study aims to propose co-benefits evaluation model for optimizing campus green coverage ratios (GCRs), employing the CRITIC weighting method, while considering multiple evaluation indicators (i.e., <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, and plantation management costs (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>)). This study used ENVI-met software to simulate and quantify the outdoor environmental effects of various GCRs scenarios in a Guangzhou university campus, a typical hot-humid area in China. The model’s accuracy was validated against on-site measurements. Results revealed a parabolic relationship between co-benefits and GCRs. As GCRs increased from 10 % to 47 %, co-benefits gradually decreased from 0.48 to 0.40. Subsequently, with additional GCR increases, co-benefits rose to 0.52, reaching a maximum enhancement of 21.6 %. Moreover, co-benefits improved by about 1.2 % to 9.3 % for each 10% increase in GCR. The GCRs exhibited positive correlations with <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>,<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>C</mi><mi>s</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, and negative correlations with <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>v</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>. Compared to 10 % GCR scenario, the air temperature, wind velocity, and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in 90 % GCR scenario decreased by 8.7 %, 44.3 %, and 1.62 %, respectively, and plantation management costs were increased by 90.4 %. This study offers valuable guidance for optimal campus green space design, promoting low-carbon and comfortable educational environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 115214"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778824013306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thermal environment of university campuses significantly impacts human comfort and building energy consumption, particularly in regions with hot and humid climates. Optimizing green space can effectively alleviate high-temperature issues and enhance cooling effects (Ec), ventilation effects (Ev), and carbon sequestration benefits (Cs). Given the limited land resources in campus areas, it is critical to optimize the design of green spaces to maximize their multiple benefits. This study aims to propose co-benefits evaluation model for optimizing campus green coverage ratios (GCRs), employing the CRITIC weighting method, while considering multiple evaluation indicators (i.e., Ec, Ev, Cs, and plantation management costs (Mc)). This study used ENVI-met software to simulate and quantify the outdoor environmental effects of various GCRs scenarios in a Guangzhou university campus, a typical hot-humid area in China. The model’s accuracy was validated against on-site measurements. Results revealed a parabolic relationship between co-benefits and GCRs. As GCRs increased from 10 % to 47 %, co-benefits gradually decreased from 0.48 to 0.40. Subsequently, with additional GCR increases, co-benefits rose to 0.52, reaching a maximum enhancement of 21.6 %. Moreover, co-benefits improved by about 1.2 % to 9.3 % for each 10% increase in GCR. The GCRs exhibited positive correlations with Ec,Cs and Mc, and negative correlations with Ev. Compared to 10 % GCR scenario, the air temperature, wind velocity, and CO2 concentration in 90 % GCR scenario decreased by 8.7 %, 44.3 %, and 1.62 %, respectively, and plantation management costs were increased by 90.4 %. This study offers valuable guidance for optimal campus green space design, promoting low-carbon and comfortable educational environments.
开发协同效益评估模型,优化湿热地区大学校园绿化覆盖设计
大学校园的热环境对人体舒适度和建筑能耗有显著影响,特别是在湿热气候地区。优化绿地可以有效缓解高温问题,提高降温效果(Ec)、通风效果(Ev)和固碳效益(Cs)。在校园土地资源有限的情况下,如何优化绿地的设计,使绿地的多重效益最大化是至关重要的。本研究旨在采用CRITIC加权法,综合考虑Ec、Ev、Cs和人工林管理成本等多个评价指标,提出优化校园绿化覆盖率的协同效益评价模型。本研究采用ENVI-met软件对中国典型湿热地区广州大学校园不同gcr情景的室外环境效应进行了模拟和量化。通过现场测量验证了模型的准确性。结果显示,共同效益与gcr之间呈抛物线关系。随着gcr从10%增加到47%,协同效益从0.48逐渐下降到0.40。随后,随着GCR的进一步增加,共同效益上升到0.52,达到21.6%的最大增强。此外,GCR每增加10%,共同效益提高约1.2%至9.3%。GCRs与Ec、Cs和Mc呈正相关,与Ev呈负相关。与10% GCR情景相比,90% GCR情景的气温、风速和CO2浓度分别降低了8.7%、44.3%和1.62%,人工林经营成本增加了90.4%。本研究为优化校园绿地设计,营造低碳舒适的教育环境提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信