What is in a label: Effects of labeling on the preference for plant-based products.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107837
Marija Branković, Anastasija Budžak, Itana Đurašković, Branko Vlajin
{"title":"What is in a label: Effects of labeling on the preference for plant-based products.","authors":"Marija Branković, Anastasija Budžak, Itana Đurašković, Branko Vlajin","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study investigated the effects of three labels on the preference for plant-based products: plant-based, vegan, and Lenten, referring to products appropriate to consume during religious fasting. We conducted two preregistered experiments to measure the effects of labeling on product preference (Study 1, N = 290) and actual tasting preferences (Study 2, N = 251) in a predominantly meat-eating European society (Serbia). We did not find statistically significant effects of labels on the preference for plant-based products in Study 1. In Study 2, the labels affected the preference for plant-based cheese, with Lenten and plant-based labels being slightly preferred over the vegan label. Labeling did not affect the tasting preference for plant-based milk or prosciutto. Across the two studies, the plant-based products were consistently favorably rated, regardless of the label. Plant-based milk emerged as the most preferred product in both studies. We also found that previous experience with plant-based products, as well as speciesism - endorsement of animal exploitation - consistently predicted preferences for plant-based products, irrespective of the label. These findings underscore the influence of labeling on some plant-based products while also revealing the overall minor impact of labeling on consumer preferences. We further discuss the absence of adverse effects of vegan labeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107837"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study investigated the effects of three labels on the preference for plant-based products: plant-based, vegan, and Lenten, referring to products appropriate to consume during religious fasting. We conducted two preregistered experiments to measure the effects of labeling on product preference (Study 1, N = 290) and actual tasting preferences (Study 2, N = 251) in a predominantly meat-eating European society (Serbia). We did not find statistically significant effects of labels on the preference for plant-based products in Study 1. In Study 2, the labels affected the preference for plant-based cheese, with Lenten and plant-based labels being slightly preferred over the vegan label. Labeling did not affect the tasting preference for plant-based milk or prosciutto. Across the two studies, the plant-based products were consistently favorably rated, regardless of the label. Plant-based milk emerged as the most preferred product in both studies. We also found that previous experience with plant-based products, as well as speciesism - endorsement of animal exploitation - consistently predicted preferences for plant-based products, irrespective of the label. These findings underscore the influence of labeling on some plant-based products while also revealing the overall minor impact of labeling on consumer preferences. We further discuss the absence of adverse effects of vegan labeling.

标签内容:标签对植物性产品偏好的影响。
我们的研究调查了三个标签对植物性产品偏好的影响:植物性、素食主义和四旬斋,指的是适合在宗教禁食期间食用的产品。我们在一个以肉食为主的欧洲社会(塞尔维亚)进行了两项预注册实验,以测量标签对产品偏好(研究1,N = 290)和实际品尝偏好(研究2,N = 251)的影响。在研究1中,我们没有发现标签对植物性产品偏好的统计学显著影响。在研究2中,这些标签影响了人们对植物性奶酪的偏好,四旬斋和植物性奶酪的标签略高于素食标签。标签不会影响人们对植物奶或熏火腿的口味偏好。在这两项研究中,无论标签如何,植物性产品都得到了一致的好评。在这两项研究中,植物性牛奶都是最受欢迎的产品。我们还发现,以前对植物性产品的经验,以及物种主义——支持动物剥削——一致地预测了人们对植物性产品的偏好,而不管标签是什么。这些发现强调了标签对一些植物性产品的影响,同时也揭示了标签对消费者偏好的总体影响较小。我们进一步讨论素食标签的不良影响的缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信