Elisa Pini, Fulvio Pepe, Veronica Laini, Nicoletta Ciccarelli, Eugenio Magni
{"title":"Early neuropsychological screening and long-term functional outcome in a sample of patients affected by mild stroke: The ReSCog Project.","authors":"Elisa Pini, Fulvio Pepe, Veronica Laini, Nicoletta Ciccarelli, Eugenio Magni","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke causes severe long-term disabilities with a significant reduction in quality of life. This study aims to explore the predictive value of cognitive screening in the acute phase of mild stroke on patients' functional outcome after discharge. A total of 110 patients with mild stroke were recruited. Patients were included in the study if they were discharged directly home from the acute units. The cognitive profile of patients was assessed with the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS). The OCS was administered 3-10 days after stroke, providing a five domain-specific cognitive profile. Long-term functional outcomes were evaluated by the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS 3.0), a self-reported questionnaire that includes physical, cognitive, emotional and social participation dimensions. All patients completed the survey online on average 10 months after stroke. Our results show that OCS is positively associated with physical and cognitive dimensions, after adjusting for age and stroke severity measured by NIHSS at admission. In conclusion, OCS in acute mild stroke seems to be an independent predictor of long-term functional outcomes and could help clinicians in the long-term management of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stroke causes severe long-term disabilities with a significant reduction in quality of life. This study aims to explore the predictive value of cognitive screening in the acute phase of mild stroke on patients' functional outcome after discharge. A total of 110 patients with mild stroke were recruited. Patients were included in the study if they were discharged directly home from the acute units. The cognitive profile of patients was assessed with the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS). The OCS was administered 3-10 days after stroke, providing a five domain-specific cognitive profile. Long-term functional outcomes were evaluated by the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS 3.0), a self-reported questionnaire that includes physical, cognitive, emotional and social participation dimensions. All patients completed the survey online on average 10 months after stroke. Our results show that OCS is positively associated with physical and cognitive dimensions, after adjusting for age and stroke severity measured by NIHSS at admission. In conclusion, OCS in acute mild stroke seems to be an independent predictor of long-term functional outcomes and could help clinicians in the long-term management of patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including:
• clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups
• behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes
• cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging
• multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science
The following types of paper are invited:
• papers reporting original empirical investigations
• theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data
• review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications
• brief reports and comments
• case reports
• fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors)
• special issues.