Biochar supplementation affects the microbiome of recycled manure solids for cow bedding: A metagenomic analysis

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Joana F. Guerreiro , Ana J. Pires , Mónica Nunes , Ana Esteves , Lélia Chambel , Pedro Pascoal , Marcelo Pereira , David Fangueiro , Luís Tavares , Ricardo Dias , Ricardo Bexiga , Manuela Oliveira
{"title":"Biochar supplementation affects the microbiome of recycled manure solids for cow bedding: A metagenomic analysis","authors":"Joana F. Guerreiro ,&nbsp;Ana J. Pires ,&nbsp;Mónica Nunes ,&nbsp;Ana Esteves ,&nbsp;Lélia Chambel ,&nbsp;Pedro Pascoal ,&nbsp;Marcelo Pereira ,&nbsp;David Fangueiro ,&nbsp;Luís Tavares ,&nbsp;Ricardo Dias ,&nbsp;Ricardo Bexiga ,&nbsp;Manuela Oliveira","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread use of recycled manure solids (RMS) as cow bedding material is not without risks, because cattle manure may act as a vehicle for pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria dissemination. Thus, our aim was to evaluate RMS supplemented with a pine biochar produced in Portugal as a new cow bedding material, because the use of biochar has been shown to have the potential to mitigate the effect of relevant bacterial species when added to animal manure microbiota. Our experimental setup consisted on fresh RMS samples that were collected on a commercial dairy farm and placed in naturally-ventilated containers for a total of 4 groups: (1) nonsupplemented RMS, (2) RMS supplemented with 2.5% (wt/wt) of biochar, (3) RMS supplemented with 5% (wt/wt) of biochar, and (4) RMS supplemented with 10% (wt/wt) of biochar. Sampling was performed at 4 different incubation times (0, 5, 15, and 30 d) and in 2 distinct seasons: April through May (humid season) and June through July (dry season). The resulting 32 samples were subjected to DNA extraction and their microbiome profile determined through complete 16S rDNA gene sequencing using Nanopore next-generation sequencing. We observed that biochar supplementation clearly altered the microbiome of RMS, which was reflected in changes in populations' diversity and the relative abundance of relevant pathogenic bacteria. In particular, we found that long-term storage (30 d) was more beneficial than short-term storage, an effect that was more evident for samples supplemented with 2.5% or 5% biochar. In both seasons, those concentrations of biochar led to a decrease in the levels of several mastitis-causing agents (<em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>, streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci). In addition, we also observed a reduction in the levels of <em>Salmonella</em> spp. and gram-positive bacilli in the biochar-supplemented samples. Unexpectedly, however, those same conditions yielded an increase in the abundance of <em>Brucella</em> spp., a group that includes important infectious agents, highlighting the need for a deeper evaluation of the effect of biochar supplementation of RMS to ensure the future safe and sustainable use of this environmentally-friendly resource in animal production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":"108 3","pages":"Pages 2620-2631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224014206","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of recycled manure solids (RMS) as cow bedding material is not without risks, because cattle manure may act as a vehicle for pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria dissemination. Thus, our aim was to evaluate RMS supplemented with a pine biochar produced in Portugal as a new cow bedding material, because the use of biochar has been shown to have the potential to mitigate the effect of relevant bacterial species when added to animal manure microbiota. Our experimental setup consisted on fresh RMS samples that were collected on a commercial dairy farm and placed in naturally-ventilated containers for a total of 4 groups: (1) nonsupplemented RMS, (2) RMS supplemented with 2.5% (wt/wt) of biochar, (3) RMS supplemented with 5% (wt/wt) of biochar, and (4) RMS supplemented with 10% (wt/wt) of biochar. Sampling was performed at 4 different incubation times (0, 5, 15, and 30 d) and in 2 distinct seasons: April through May (humid season) and June through July (dry season). The resulting 32 samples were subjected to DNA extraction and their microbiome profile determined through complete 16S rDNA gene sequencing using Nanopore next-generation sequencing. We observed that biochar supplementation clearly altered the microbiome of RMS, which was reflected in changes in populations' diversity and the relative abundance of relevant pathogenic bacteria. In particular, we found that long-term storage (30 d) was more beneficial than short-term storage, an effect that was more evident for samples supplemented with 2.5% or 5% biochar. In both seasons, those concentrations of biochar led to a decrease in the levels of several mastitis-causing agents (Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, enterococci, and staphylococci). In addition, we also observed a reduction in the levels of Salmonella spp. and gram-positive bacilli in the biochar-supplemented samples. Unexpectedly, however, those same conditions yielded an increase in the abundance of Brucella spp., a group that includes important infectious agents, highlighting the need for a deeper evaluation of the effect of biochar supplementation of RMS to ensure the future safe and sustainable use of this environmentally-friendly resource in animal production.
补充生物炭会影响牛床用循环肥料固体的微生物组:宏基因组分析。
广泛使用回收粪肥固体(RMS)作为牛垫料并非没有风险,因为牛粪可能成为致病和抗微生物细菌传播的载体。因此,我们的目的是评估在葡萄牙生产的松树生物炭中添加rms作为一种新的奶牛垫料,因为生物炭的使用已被证明在添加到动物粪便微生物群时具有减轻相关细菌物种影响的潜力。我们的实验设置包括从商业奶牛场收集的新鲜RMS样品,并将其放置在自然通风的容器中,共分为四组:1-未补充RMS;2-RMS中添加2.5% (wt/wt)的生物炭;3-RMS中添加5% (wt/wt)的生物炭;4-RMS中添加10% (wt/wt)的生物炭。在4个不同的孵育时间(0、5、15和30 d)和2个不同的季节:4 - 5月(湿润季节)和6 - 7月(旱季)进行采样。得到的32个样品进行DNA提取,并通过使用纳米孔下一代测序技术进行完整的16S rDNA基因测序来确定其微生物组谱。我们观察到,添加生物炭明显改变了RMS的微生物组,这反映在种群多样性和相关致病菌的相对丰度的变化上。特别是,我们发现长期储存(30 d)比短期储存更有益,对于添加2.5%或5%生物炭的样品,这种效果更为明显。在这两个季节,这些生物炭的浓度导致几种乳腺炎病原体(肠杆菌科、链球菌、肠球菌和葡萄球菌)的水平下降。此外,我们还观察到在添加生物炭的样品中沙门氏菌和革兰氏阳性杆菌的水平降低。然而,出乎意料的是,在相同的条件下,布鲁氏菌的丰度增加了,这一群体包括重要的感染因子,这突出表明需要对RMS补充生物炭的影响进行更深入的评估,以确保未来在动物生产中安全、可持续地利用这种环境友好型资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信