"FBT Is for the Rich": A Qualitative Study Examining Clinicians' Experiences and Perceptions of Treatment Access and Engagement for Diverse Families in Family-Based Treatment.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jessica Sauerwein, Amelia Austin, Manya Singh, Pardis Pedram, Erica Allan, Lindsey Bruett, Sarah Eckhardt, Sarah Forsberg, Helene Keery, Melissa Kimber, Martin Pradel, Erin C Accurso, Daniel Le Grange, Gina Dimitropoulos
{"title":"\"FBT Is for the Rich\": A Qualitative Study Examining Clinicians' Experiences and Perceptions of Treatment Access and Engagement for Diverse Families in Family-Based Treatment.","authors":"Jessica Sauerwein, Amelia Austin, Manya Singh, Pardis Pedram, Erica Allan, Lindsey Bruett, Sarah Eckhardt, Sarah Forsberg, Helene Keery, Melissa Kimber, Martin Pradel, Erin C Accurso, Daniel Le Grange, Gina Dimitropoulos","doi":"10.1002/eat.24351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Family-based treatment (FBT) is the leading evidence-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders, but research exploring access and engagement in FBT is sparse. This paper focuses on findings from a broader study, specifically addressing the social determinants of health (SDH) impeding access and engagement in FBT for diverse families (i.e., families belonging to identity groups subject to systemic barriers and prejudices).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one FBT clinicians were recruited globally using purposive and snowball sampling. Clinicians participated in individual interviews or focus groups, discussing their experiences engaging diverse families in FBT. Qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings underscore the pervasive impact of SDH on equitable access to FBT, specifically, the critical need for tailored approaches by clinicians to enhance access and engagement in FBT for diverse families experiencing practical, resource, and systemic barriers. Recommendations include broader dissemination of FBT knowledge, telehealth options to mitigate geographical barriers, community resource collaborations, and sensitivity to cultural and systemic factors impacting treatment engagement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of this study may inform future FBT planning (tailoring treatment approaches to address barriers), clinician training, clinical decision-making tools, and opportunities for supporting under-resourced families within the model, leading to more equitable FBT treatment access and engagement for diverse families.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Family-based treatment (FBT) is the leading evidence-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders, but research exploring access and engagement in FBT is sparse. This paper focuses on findings from a broader study, specifically addressing the social determinants of health (SDH) impeding access and engagement in FBT for diverse families (i.e., families belonging to identity groups subject to systemic barriers and prejudices).

Methods: Forty-one FBT clinicians were recruited globally using purposive and snowball sampling. Clinicians participated in individual interviews or focus groups, discussing their experiences engaging diverse families in FBT. Qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The findings underscore the pervasive impact of SDH on equitable access to FBT, specifically, the critical need for tailored approaches by clinicians to enhance access and engagement in FBT for diverse families experiencing practical, resource, and systemic barriers. Recommendations include broader dissemination of FBT knowledge, telehealth options to mitigate geographical barriers, community resource collaborations, and sensitivity to cultural and systemic factors impacting treatment engagement.

Discussion: Results of this study may inform future FBT planning (tailoring treatment approaches to address barriers), clinician training, clinical decision-making tools, and opportunities for supporting under-resourced families within the model, leading to more equitable FBT treatment access and engagement for diverse families.

“FBT是为富人”:一项定性研究检查临床医生的经验和观念的治疗机会和参与不同家庭在家庭为基础的治疗。
目的:以家庭为基础的治疗(FBT)是青少年饮食失调的主要循证治疗方法,但探索FBT的可及性和参与度的研究很少。本文侧重于一项更广泛的研究的结果,特别是解决阻碍不同家庭(即属于受系统性障碍和偏见影响的身份群体的家庭)获得和参与FBT的健康社会决定因素(SDH)。方法:采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,在全球范围内招募41名FBT临床医生。临床医生参加了个别访谈或焦点小组,讨论他们参与不同家庭FBT的经验。定性数据逐字转录并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:研究结果强调了SDH对公平获得FBT的普遍影响,特别是临床医生迫切需要量身定制的方法,以提高经历实际、资源和系统障碍的不同家庭获得和参与FBT的机会。建议包括更广泛地传播FBT知识、减少地理障碍的远程保健选择、社区资源合作以及对影响治疗参与的文化和系统因素的敏感性。讨论:本研究的结果可能会为未来的FBT规划(定制治疗方法以解决障碍)、临床医生培训、临床决策工具以及在模型中支持资源不足家庭的机会提供信息,从而使不同家庭更公平地获得FBT治疗和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信