Understanding Daily Care Experience Preferences Across the Lifespan of Older Adults: Application of Natural Language Processing.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1177/01939459241306946
Se Hee Min, Kyungmi Woo, Jiyoun Song, Gregory L Alexander, Terrence O'Malley, Maria D Moen, Maxim Topaz
{"title":"Understanding Daily Care Experience Preferences Across the Lifespan of Older Adults: Application of Natural Language Processing.","authors":"Se Hee Min, Kyungmi Woo, Jiyoun Song, Gregory L Alexander, Terrence O'Malley, Maria D Moen, Maxim Topaz","doi":"10.1177/01939459241306946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults are a heterogeneous group, and their care experience preferences are likely to be diverse and individualized. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify categories of older adults' care experience preferences and to examine similarities and differences across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial categories of older adults' care experience preferences were identified through a qualitative review of narrative text (n = 3134) in the ADVault data set. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was used to automatically and accurately define older adults' care experience preference categories. Descriptive statistics were used to examine similarities and differences in care experience preference categories across different age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall average performance of NLP algorithms was relatively high (average <i>F</i>-score = 0.88; range: 0.77-0.96). Through a qualitative review of 350 randomly selected texts, a total of 11 categories were identified. The most frequent category was music, followed by photographs, entertainment, family/friends, religion-related, atmosphere, flower/plants, pet, bed/bedding, hobby, and other. After applying the best performing NLP algorithm to each category, older adults' care experience preference categories were music (41.32%), followed by photographs (28.47%), entertainment (13.46%), religion-related (n = 12.69%), pet (12.22%), flower/plants (11.51%), family/friends (8.45%), atmosphere (7.75%), bed/bedding (6.12%), and hobby (5.45%). Young-old and old-old adults had similar care experience preferences with music being the most frequent category while old-old adults had photographs as the most frequent category for their care experience preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians must understand the distinct categories of care experience preferences and incorporate them into personalized care planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"71-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241306946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults are a heterogeneous group, and their care experience preferences are likely to be diverse and individualized. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify categories of older adults' care experience preferences and to examine similarities and differences across different age groups.

Methods: The initial categories of older adults' care experience preferences were identified through a qualitative review of narrative text (n = 3134) in the ADVault data set. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was used to automatically and accurately define older adults' care experience preference categories. Descriptive statistics were used to examine similarities and differences in care experience preference categories across different age groups.

Results: The overall average performance of NLP algorithms was relatively high (average F-score = 0.88; range: 0.77-0.96). Through a qualitative review of 350 randomly selected texts, a total of 11 categories were identified. The most frequent category was music, followed by photographs, entertainment, family/friends, religion-related, atmosphere, flower/plants, pet, bed/bedding, hobby, and other. After applying the best performing NLP algorithm to each category, older adults' care experience preference categories were music (41.32%), followed by photographs (28.47%), entertainment (13.46%), religion-related (n = 12.69%), pet (12.22%), flower/plants (11.51%), family/friends (8.45%), atmosphere (7.75%), bed/bedding (6.12%), and hobby (5.45%). Young-old and old-old adults had similar care experience preferences with music being the most frequent category while old-old adults had photographs as the most frequent category for their care experience preference.

Conclusion: Clinicians must understand the distinct categories of care experience preferences and incorporate them into personalized care planning.

理解老年人一生中日常护理体验偏好:自然语言处理的应用。
老年人是一个异质性群体,他们的护理体验偏好可能是多样化和个性化的。因此,本研究的目的是确定老年人护理经验偏好的类别,并检查不同年龄组之间的异同。方法:通过对ADVault数据集中叙述性文本(n = 3134)的定性回顾,确定老年人护理经验偏好的初始类别。采用自然语言处理(NLP)算法自动准确地定义老年人的护理体验偏好类别。使用描述性统计来检验不同年龄组的护理经验偏好类别的异同。结果:NLP算法总体平均性能较高(平均F-score = 0.88;范围:0.77 - -0.96)。通过对350个随机选择的文本进行定性审查,共确定了11个类别。最常见的类别是音乐,其次是照片、娱乐、家庭/朋友、宗教相关、氛围、花卉/植物、宠物、床上用品、爱好和其他。将表现最佳的NLP算法应用于每个类别后,老年人护理体验偏好类别为音乐(41.32%),其次是照片(28.47%)、娱乐(13.46%)、宗教相关(n = 12.69%)、宠物(12.22%)、花卉/植物(11.51%)、家人/朋友(8.45%)、氛围(7.75%)、床上用品(6.12%)和爱好(5.45%)。年轻人和老年人的护理体验偏好相似,音乐是最常见的类别,而老年人的护理体验偏好中,照片是最常见的类别。结论:临床医生必须了解不同类别的护理体验偏好,并将其纳入个性化护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信