January in this issue

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
{"title":"January in this issue","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/medu.15582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper offers a novel conceptual framework outlining factors that are critical for successfully establishing new medical schools in medically under-served areas and beyond. The authors note that establishing a medical school is a significant venture involving many complex and multi-faceted considerations, yet there is limited research and theory available to guide leaders and stakeholders engaged in the process. In this original research, critical realist ways of knowing are adopted, underpinned by emphasis on social accountability, to examine case study medical schools across three continents. Institutional Entrepreneurship theory is then adapted from the business domain to derive the ‘Eight C's Framework’.</p><p>\n <span>Kirubakaran, S</span>, <span>Kumar, K</span>, <span>Worley, P</span>, <span>Pimlott, J</span>, <span>Greenhill, J</span>. <span>Establishing new medical schools in diverse contexts: a novel conceptual framework for success</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>1</span>): <span>25</span>-<span>36</span>. doi:10.1111/medu.15421.</p><p>Online learning offers opportunities to expand equitable access to medical education worldwide but risks deepening digital inequalities between the global North and South. This cross-cultural dialogue examines the historical underrepresentation of the global South in designing online medical education, highlighting resulting challenges and proposing solutions. Barriers include socioeconomic disparities and systemic digital inequalities rooted in Northern dominance. The absence of Southern perspectives limits the relevance and sustainability of digital learning tools. The authors advocate for equitable partnerships that prioritize local input and expertise while balancing global standards with local needs, aiming to create more inclusive and effective online education for diverse populations.</p><p>\n <span>Han, SP</span>, <span>Kumwenda, B</span>. <span>Bridging the digital divide: promoting equal access to online learning in an unequal world</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>1</span>): <span>56</span>-<span>64</span>, doi:10.1111/medu.15455.</p><p>This article explores inclusive assessment in health professions education by integrating diverse perspectives from three countries. It highlights the importance of fostering an inclusive assessment culture for equitable education while addressing challenges such as misconceptions about lowering standards, concerns over reliability, and the vague definition of inclusion. The authors emphasize the need to recognize intersectionality in designing assessments and propose practical considerations for health professional education practitioners. These suggestions span global, national, institutional, programmatic, and individual levels, aiming to guide the development of well-contextualized, inclusive assessment practices applicable across the educational continuum.</p><p>\n <span>Finn, G</span>, <span>Tai, J</span>, <span>Nadarajah, V</span>. <span>Inclusive assessment in health professions education: balancing global goals and local contexts</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>1</span>): <span>88</span>-<span>96</span>, doi:10.1111/medu.15535.</p><p>Medical curricula often perpetuate epistemic violence through white supremacy, Indigenous erasure, and heteronormativity, shaped by Western ideologies. This article critiques these systemic issues and advocates for alternative approaches inspired by Global South and Indigenous knowledge systems. Drawing on Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy and Irihapeti Ramsden's cultural safety, the authors emphasize fostering critical consciousness, addressing power dynamics, and acknowledging historical trauma. Incorporating Ubuntu, a Southern African philosophy of collective humanity, they propose a rights-based, solidarity-driven curriculum. By integrating critical pedagogies of love and discomfort, they aim to create a medical education system rooted in shared humanity and cultural understanding.</p><p>\n <span>Razack, S</span>, <span>Richardson, L</span>, <span>Pillay, SR</span>. <span>The violence of curriculum: dismantling systemic racism, Coloniality, and indigenous erasure within the knowledge Systems of Health Professions Education</span>. <i>Med Educ.</i> <span>2025</span>; <span>59</span>(<span>1</span>): <span>114</span>-<span>123</span>, doi:10.1111/medu.15470 .</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":"59 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/medu.15582","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.15582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper offers a novel conceptual framework outlining factors that are critical for successfully establishing new medical schools in medically under-served areas and beyond. The authors note that establishing a medical school is a significant venture involving many complex and multi-faceted considerations, yet there is limited research and theory available to guide leaders and stakeholders engaged in the process. In this original research, critical realist ways of knowing are adopted, underpinned by emphasis on social accountability, to examine case study medical schools across three continents. Institutional Entrepreneurship theory is then adapted from the business domain to derive the ‘Eight C's Framework’.

Kirubakaran, S, Kumar, K, Worley, P, Pimlott, J, Greenhill, J. Establishing new medical schools in diverse contexts: a novel conceptual framework for success. Med Educ. 2025; 59(1): 25-36. doi:10.1111/medu.15421.

Online learning offers opportunities to expand equitable access to medical education worldwide but risks deepening digital inequalities between the global North and South. This cross-cultural dialogue examines the historical underrepresentation of the global South in designing online medical education, highlighting resulting challenges and proposing solutions. Barriers include socioeconomic disparities and systemic digital inequalities rooted in Northern dominance. The absence of Southern perspectives limits the relevance and sustainability of digital learning tools. The authors advocate for equitable partnerships that prioritize local input and expertise while balancing global standards with local needs, aiming to create more inclusive and effective online education for diverse populations.

Han, SP, Kumwenda, B. Bridging the digital divide: promoting equal access to online learning in an unequal world. Med Educ. 2025; 59(1): 56-64, doi:10.1111/medu.15455.

This article explores inclusive assessment in health professions education by integrating diverse perspectives from three countries. It highlights the importance of fostering an inclusive assessment culture for equitable education while addressing challenges such as misconceptions about lowering standards, concerns over reliability, and the vague definition of inclusion. The authors emphasize the need to recognize intersectionality in designing assessments and propose practical considerations for health professional education practitioners. These suggestions span global, national, institutional, programmatic, and individual levels, aiming to guide the development of well-contextualized, inclusive assessment practices applicable across the educational continuum.

Finn, G, Tai, J, Nadarajah, V. Inclusive assessment in health professions education: balancing global goals and local contexts. Med Educ. 2025; 59(1): 88-96, doi:10.1111/medu.15535.

Medical curricula often perpetuate epistemic violence through white supremacy, Indigenous erasure, and heteronormativity, shaped by Western ideologies. This article critiques these systemic issues and advocates for alternative approaches inspired by Global South and Indigenous knowledge systems. Drawing on Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy and Irihapeti Ramsden's cultural safety, the authors emphasize fostering critical consciousness, addressing power dynamics, and acknowledging historical trauma. Incorporating Ubuntu, a Southern African philosophy of collective humanity, they propose a rights-based, solidarity-driven curriculum. By integrating critical pedagogies of love and discomfort, they aim to create a medical education system rooted in shared humanity and cultural understanding.

Razack, S, Richardson, L, Pillay, SR. The violence of curriculum: dismantling systemic racism, Coloniality, and indigenous erasure within the knowledge Systems of Health Professions Education. Med Educ. 2025; 59(1): 114-123, doi:10.1111/medu.15470 .

一月号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信